Big (4) Audit Firms Blasted By PCAOB And Gary Gensler, Head Of SEC (#GotBitcoin)
Fired KPMG Audit Head Fined Over Failure To Supervise Senior Auditors (Updated: 4-5-2022) Big (4) Audit Firms Blasted By PCAOB And Gary Gensler, Head Of SEC (#GotBitcoin)
The PCAOB said it is the first time the U.S. audit watchdog has brought such a charge against an individual.
Related:
The Miracle Of Blockchain’s Triple Entry Accounting
Ernst & Young Introduces Tax Tool For Reporting Bitcoin
Big (4) Audit Firms Entwined In Conflicts Of Interest In Push For ESG Compliance
Ultimate Resource For Money Laundering, Spoofing, Market-Rigging, Etc. In Banking Industry
Ultimate Resource On Insider Trading
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Is A Scam
Blockchain And Government-As-A-Platform AKA Algorithmic Regulation
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board said it fined the fired former head of KPMG LLP’s U.S. audit business $100,000, the largest monetary penalty it’s ever imposed on an individual in a settled case.
Scott Marcello in 2017 was fired as the professional-services firm’s vice chair of audit over a leak of confidential information. KPMG at the time said it terminated Mr. Marcello and four other partners for mishandling a tip that gave the firm improper advance word about which of its audits the PCAOB planned to scrutinize in its annual inspections.
The so-called “steal the exam” scandal led to KPMG paying a $50 million settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2019 and a one-year prison sentence for Mr. Marcello’s deputy, David Middendorf, who later appealed his conviction.
The U.S. audit watchdog on Tuesday said Mr. Marcello failed to reasonably supervise senior auditors who engaged in the scheme to improve KPMG’s inspection results. The PCAOB said the case marks the first time it has imposed sanctions for a failure to supervise employees. The SEC, which oversees the PCAOB, rarely charges firms or people with failure to supervise in its enforcement actions.
Previously, the largest fine on an individual in a PCAOB settlement was $75,000, which it imposed in 2009 against former Deloitte & Touche partner Thomas J. Linden for allegedly helping a client avoid restating financial results.
The biggest penalty on an individual subject to litigated disciplinary proceedings was $100,000, which was imposed in 2015 against Hamid Kabani, president of accounting firm Kabani & Co.
“The PCAOB is committed to sanctioning top-level personnel at the largest firms when they fail to take sufficient supervisory steps aimed at preventing violations by their subordinates,” PCAOB Chair Erica Williams said in a statement. “The board believes it is important to hold Mr. Marcello accountable as their supervisor for contributing to a culture that led to this serious misconduct.”
KPMG, in response to the sanctions Tuesday, said it is a stronger firm as a result of the actions taken since 2017 to bolster its culture, governance and compliance program. “Integrity and quality are paramount for KPMG, including operating with the utmost regard for the critical importance of the regulatory process to our profession,” a KPMG spokesman said.
Mr. Marcello didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
The sanctions come months after Ms. Williams took the helm of the PCAOB and three others joined the five-member board. The SEC last November appointed new PCAOB board members after firing the former chair, William Duhnke, in June.
The PCAOB disciplines audit firms and individual auditors for violations in addition to setting audit standards and inspecting audits.
The PCAOB disclosed 18 enforcement actions in 2021, up from 13 the prior year but down from the previous five-year average of nearly 29, according to a calendar-year analysis of regulatory data by Cornerstone Research, a financial-consulting firm.
The PCAOB under new leadership is expected to increase its scrutiny of audit firms, further incorporate investor concerns into its work and potentially strengthen its approach to enforcement, accountants and former regulators have said.
Updated: 7-25-2022
KPMG Is Fined $17.3 Million In U.K. For Audit Shortfalls
The fine came in relation to two audits, one involving the now-defunct Carillion. Four former KPMG employees were also fined and temporarily banned from the profession, and a fifth was reprimanded.
The U.K.’s audit and accounting regulator fined KPMG LLP and sanctioned five former employees for providing false and misleading information in relation to two audits, one of them of the now-defunct Carillion PLC.
On Monday, the Financial Reporting Council said KPMG was fined £14.4 million—equivalent to $17.3 million—for failings related to the audits of construction and outsourcing giant Carillion and Regenersis PLC, a data-security company that has been renamed Blancco Technology Group PLC. The fine was reduced from £20 million to acknowledge KPMG’s own reporting of misconduct as well as its cooperation with the regulator.
An audit and accounting industry tribunal imposed the fine, saying KPMG provided false and misleading information and documents to the FRC. The tribunal also ordered KPMG to appoint an independent reviewer to consider the effectiveness of the firm’s policies and its engagement with audit inspectors. KPMG agreed to pay £3.95 million in costs related to the investigation.
Four of the accounting firm’s former employees were fined and banned from the auditing profession for varying numbers of years. A fifth was “severely reprimanded,” the FRC said.
“I accept the findings and sanctions of the tribunal in full,” Jon Holt, chief executive of KPMG UK, said in a statement. “The behavior underlying this case was wrong and should never have happened.”
Of the five former employees, Peter Meehan, a former partner, received the most severe penalty, with a ban of 10 years from auditing and a £250,000 fine.
Mr. Meehan, who led the fiscal 2016 Carillion audit, acted alongside Adam Bennett, Alistair Wright and Richard Kitchen to mislead audit inspectors with respect to year-end clearance meeting minutes and an audit working paper, according to the FRC. Pratik Paw followed instructions from Mr. Wright to create the false meeting minutes, the FRC said.
Mr. Meehan’s representatives didn’t respond to a request for comment.
The tribunal found Messrs. Bennett and Wright either had a role in or made false or misleading representations to audit inspectors related to Regenersis’s fiscal 2014 audit. Both men were banned from auditing for eight years and fined: Mr. Wright £45,000, and Mr. Bennett £40,000.
Representatives for Mr. Bennett and Mr. Wright didn’t respond to requests for comment.
Mr. Kitchen, whose representatives declined to comment, was banned from accounting for seven years and fined £30,000.
Representatives for Mr. Paw—a 25-year-old junior auditor when he worked on the Carillion account—noted that the tribunal found that he had failed to question the instructions given him, but not that he had acted dishonestly.
“Pratik deeply regrets not questioning these instructions from his superior and has learned a great deal from his conduct at the time, especially so early in his career,” the representatives said.
Separately, Stuart Smith, who had led the Regenersis audit for KPMG, in January reached a settlement with the FRC in which he agreed to a £150,000 fine and a three-year ban from the profession.
The £14.4 million fine was the second largest ever issued by the FRC, after a £15 million penalty against Deloitte in 2020 in relation to its audits of software company Autonomy Corp. Deloitte is a sponsor of CFO Journal.
Spurred by the collapse of Carillion in early 2018, the U.K.’s audit and accounting sector is set to be overhauled.
The revamp, which includes creation of a new regulator to replace the FRC—called the Audit, Reporting and Governance Authority—has been criticized by industry observers for being slow to take form.
Misconduct that thwarts the FRC’s ability to monitor and inspect audit quality is “extremely serious,” Elizabeth Barrett, the FRC’s executive counsel, said in a statement.
The tribunal’s full report is expected out in “due course,” an FRC spokesman said. A separate investigation into the quality of KPMG’s audits of Carillion’s financial statements remains ongoing, he added.
Updated: 7-27-2022
SEC’s Gensler Says PCAOB Has Been Sluggish In Rulemaking
The chair of the U.S. securities regulator also urged audit firms to review and enhance their independence protocols with respect to their auditing and consulting practices.
Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler said the U.S. audit regulator has been slow to update its rules, in a speech marking the 20th anniversary of the law that created it.
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, created as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, continues to work with interim standards that it was allowed to use from the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, a professional association whose guidelines and rules are often used as fallbacks for the industry.
“The expectation was that the board would produce a more appropriate set of standards going forward,” Mr. Gensler said on Wednesday at an event hosted by the Center for Audit Quality, a U.S. accounting-industry group. “Historically, though, the PCAOB has been too slow to update auditing standards.”
Mr. Gensler, during the speech, also said the Chinese government needs to decide whether to comply with U.S. law in order for Chinese companies to remain listed on U.S. stock exchanges.
The issue arose after the U.S. passed a law that bans foreign businesses from its exchanges if their auditors haven’t been inspected by the PCAOB for three years in a row.
Erica Williams, who became the PCAOB’s chairwoman in January, in recent months has been working with other board members and staff to advance the body’s strategy.
The PCAOB in May said it would craft proposals this year on audit quality controls and auditors’ consideration of potentially illegal acts in the audit by their clients.
The watchdog last month adopted a rule strengthening the requirements for lead auditors in supervising other auditors outside their firms, the first standard to pass under Ms. Williams.
The SEC in November appointed four new board members to the PCAOB, including Ms. Williams, after firing the former chairman, William Duhnke, and moving to replace the board in June 2021.
“While they have their work cut out for them, I believe that Chair Erica Williams and the Board can live up to Congress’s original vision with respect to standard-setting,” Mr. Gensler said.
Mr. Gensler has previously said the PCAOB wasn’t living up to its role as a setter and enforcer of auditing standards.
Ms. Williams and the board have laid out an aggressive standard-setting agenda and she welcomes Mr. Gensler’s support as they work to modernize and strengthen its standards, a PCAOB spokesperson said.
Mr. Gensler said in Wednesday’s speech that U.S. audit quality has improved since 2002 but noted that certain areas, such as auditor independence, are still lacking.
Mr. Gensler said he has asked the PCAOB to look into updating audit independence standards and said the SEC might need to take a fresh look at its own auditor independence rules.
The U.S. securities regulator in 2020 gave auditors more discretion in assessing conflicts of interest in their relationships with businesses they audit. The PCAOB’s rules are currently aligned with those of the SEC.
Mr. Gensler also urged audit firms to review and enhance their independence protocols with respect to their auditing and consulting practices. “Given the growth in the size and complexity of nonaudit services, it is important that audit firms maintain a culture of ethics and integrity—placing the highest priority on auditor independence throughout the firm, not just in the audit practice,” he said.
Ernst & Young is considering a breakup of its business into separate audit and consulting businesses that will provide audit and advisory services to clients.
Updated: 2-17-2023
Lack of Crypto Audit Regulation Raises Questions About PCAOB Authority
Watchdog says it lacks jurisdiction on audits of private companies, but some accountants and academics say there are ways to strengthen its crypto oversight.
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board is facing calls to be the regulator that brings supervision to bear on auditors of cryptocurrency companies, even as the majority of crypto businesses fall outside its jurisdiction.
Cryptocurrencies in the U.S. are largely unregulated, leaving investors at risk of market manipulation and fraud, and most crypto exchanges are privately held, so they aren’t required to produce audited financial statements or file the reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Additionally, there isn’t a regulatory framework for audits for many crypto companies.
The SEC, which oversees the PCAOB, is reviewing how crypto companies portray reports from audit firms in the aftermath of the FTX collapse. The regulator is especially concerned about so-called proof-of-reserves reports, which aim to show sufficient assets to cover customer funds.
“It is the Wild West in the sense that nobody is requiring audits of financial statements and no one is specifying the standards that ought to apply to proof-of-reserves reports,” said Douglas Carmichael, a Baruch College accounting professor and former PCAOB chief auditor.
“It’s a big concern when investors get a report from an audit firm that seems to provide assurance when it doesn’t.”
Privately held crypto exchanges such as Binance Holdings Ltd., Kraken and Crypto.com, have moved to bolster efforts around these reports, which fall short of full audits.
Additionally, different FTX units secured full audits from auditors Armanino LLP and Prager Metis CPAs LLC before the crypto exchange’s implosion, in contrast with other privately held exchanges.
The PCAOB lists inspection reports on registered audit firms, including Prager Metis and Armanino, on its website.
The PCAOB—which sets audit standards, inspects audits and disciplines audit firms—has said it can only oversee audits of public companies and SEC-registered broker-dealers. The watchdog in 2019, however, set up a team of inspectors who focus on emerging audit risks, including in the cryptocurrency field.
“The PCAOB prioritizes cryptocurrency-related inspections and is committed to vigorously enforcing our standards wherever they apply, including registered broker-dealers,” spokesman Kent Bonham said.
Those efforts aren’t enough for Sens. Ron Wyden (D., Ore.) and Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.). In a letter last month to PCAOB Chair Erica Williams, they said the watchdog ignored what they called questionable practices by auditors of crypto companies.
The lawmakers cited PCAOB rules requiring registered accounting firms to meet the regulator’s standards when preparing any audit, even if an audited firm falls outside the watchdog’s jurisdiction.
Their view ignores the PCAOB’s statutory authority and hasn’t been applied by the regulator, said Coy Garrison, a former counsel to SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce who now is a partner at law firm Steptoe & Johnson LLP focusing on crypto regulation.
A Senate aide countered that the PCAOB “has a responsibility to ensure PCAOB-registered auditors treat crypto companies with the same scrutiny other companies face, or they’ll lose their credibility.”
Accountants and academics say there might be ways to strengthen the PCAOB’s crypto oversight.
Some accountants say it is accurate to classify centralized crypto exchanges as broker-dealers and the SEC could designate them as such so their audits would fall under the PCAOB’s oversight.
That would require the SEC to classify crypto assets as securities through a rule-making process, Mr. Garrison said.
SEC Chair Gary Gensler has said most crypto tokens are securities falling under his agency’s jurisdiction and should comply with investor-protection laws. But many crypto firms are broker-dealers that haven’t registered with the SEC, he has said.
Mr. Gensler has also said it is possible some crypto intermediaries would need to register with the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, similar to some mutual funds and brokers. The SEC declined to comment.
The PCAOB’s Mr. Bonham said authority to register broker-dealers lies with the SEC.
“The PCAOB welcomes Chair Gensler’s comments and stands ready to inspect any newly registered broker-dealers as part of our overall efforts to prioritize cryptocurrency oversight,” he said.
The PCAOB in 2011 launched an interim program to inspect audits of broker-dealers after the Dodd-Frank Act expanded its mandate. Mr. Bonham said the program, while still interim, is working well and is an important part of PCAOB inspections.
The deficiencies of broker-dealer audits remained “unacceptably high,” according to an annual PCAOB report released last August.
The audit regulator’s powers could be expanded if Congress moves to amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that created the watchdog, potentially allowing PCAOB-registered audit firms to apply PCAOB standards to audits of nonpublic companies, accounting professors said.
That is a good idea in principle, but Congress might not further expand the PCAOB’s authority, and the regulator likely doesn’t have the resources to tackle a related surge in workload, said Vivian Fang, professor of accounting at the University of Minnesota and chief adviser of tax, accounting and policy at crypto software firm Ledgible Inc.
The PCAOB is funded by public companies and broker-dealers, and it would gain fees from private companies under an expansion, but “I’m not sure that is a challenge the PCAOB is ready to take on right now,” she said.
Even potential improvements to crypto audit regulation might not prevent fraud in the crypto industry, said Andrew Kitto, an assistant professor of accounting at the University of Massachusetts Amherst and a former PCAOB economic research fellow.
“If you have auditors that are subject to more stringent auditing oversight, you still have a lot of incentives for individuals to try and evade their auditors,” he said.
Updated: 2-21-2023
China Urges State Firms To Drop Big Four Auditors On Data Risk
* SOEs Encouraged To Use Local Auditors When Contracts Expire
* Guidance Reiterated Even After China Reached Us Audit Deal
Chinese authorities have urged state-owned firms to phase out using the four biggest international accounting firms, signaling continued concerns about data security even after Beijing reached a landmark deal to allow US audit inspections on hundreds of Chinese firms listed in New York.
China’s Ministry of Finance is among government entities that gave the so-called window guidance to some state-owned enterprises as recently as last month, urging them to let contracts with the Big Four auditing firms expire, according to people familiar with the matter.
While offshore subsidiaries can still use US auditors, the parent firms were urged to hire local Chinese or Hong Kong accountants when contracts come up, one of the people said, asking not to be identified discussing private information.
China is seeking to rein in the influence of the US-linked global audit firms and ensure the nation’s data security, as well as to bolster the local accounting industry, the people said.
Beijing has been giving the same suggestion to state-backed firms for years, but recently re-emphasized that companies should use other auditors than the Big Four, the people added. No deadline has been set for the changes and replacements may happen gradually as contracts expire.
While the China-US audit deal last year was hailed as a sign that the competitive superpowers can still work together on some issues, Beijing’s audit guidance is a reminder that decoupling is still proceeding in sensitive areas like SOEs and advanced technology.
One risk for China is that shifting to lesser-known auditors will make it harder for SOEs to attract capital from international investors.
“It builds in a further hurdle for Chinese SOEs in terms of appealing to international capital,” said Richard Harris, chief executive officer of Hong Kong-based investment business consultancy and fund manager Port Shelter Investment Management.
“I’m not sure if the data held secret as a result is likely to be important enough to justify inhibiting that access to international capital as accountants have a legal obligation to be confidential.”
China’s finance ministry and representatives of the Chinese offices of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Ernst & Young, KPMG and Deloitte & Touche LLP — collectively known as the Big Four auditing firms — didn’t respond to requests seeking comment.
As for the global arms, PwC, KPMG and Ernst & Young declined to comment, and Deloitte didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
The frosty relationship between China and the US shows no signs of abating, with the episode over an alleged Chinese spy balloon adding further tension.
But the audit breakthrough last year was seen as a positive sign, ending decades-long spat that threatened to kick more than 200 Chinese firms off the American exchanges.
The US Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday declined to comment on Chinese authorities’ move on accounting firms. Generally, SEC rules don’t require companies to work with one of the Big Four accounting firms.
But companies must use accounting firms registered with the US Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, an auditor watchdog agency overseen by the SEC.
Companies traded on US exchanges risk being delisted if the PCAOB isn’t able to fully inspect and investigate the work papers of their auditors after three years in a row.
“The PCAOB continues to demand complete access to inspect and investigate all registered firms in China, and there will be no loopholes and no exceptions whether those firms are part of a global network or not,” Erica Williams, the board’s chair, said in a statement Wednesday.
“Should PRC authorities obstruct or otherwise fail to facilitate the PCAOB’s complete access at any point, in any way, the board will act immediately.”
The PCAOB in December completed its first-ever on-site work paper inspection of some of the largest Chinese companies and said it was able to sufficiently review audit documents during the trip to Hong Kong, which was hosted by PwC and KPMG. The PCAOB is planning further reviews this year.
Several big state firms including China Eastern Airlines Corp., China Life Insurance Co. and Petrochina Co. have voluntarily applied to delist from the American exchanges.
Voluntary delisting, however, doesn’t protect issuers’ “audit engagements from being selected for PCAOB inspections or investigations,” a PCAOB spokesperson said.
“PCAOB inspections of firms are retrospective. So if a company delists in a given year, PCAOB may still inspect audits from previous years while it was listed or investigate the audit work.”
Winners And Losers
Getting shut out of Chinese state-owned business would be a blow to the accounting firms. The Big Four earned combined revenue of 20.6 billion yuan ($3 billion) from all Chinese clients in 2021, according to the finance ministry.
Some 60 Hong Kong-listed companies with Chinese headquarters — state-owned and private — have changed auditors since September last year, when the PCAOB started its historic review.
Smaller Chinese and Hong Kong firms gained almost 20 jobs from the Big Four, according to Hong Kong exchange filings.
Those changing to smaller audit firms in recent months include property developer Sino-Ocean Group Holding Ltd. and its subsidiary Sino-Ocean Service Holding Ltd., which dropped PwC, citing good governance practices to rotate auditors after long years of service.
Furniture maker Red Star Macalline Group Corp. proposed to end a contract with EY because they “failed to reach consensus on the work schedule and expenses.”
While the Big Four dominate China at the moment, smaller rivals are edging up. Potential winners of new business could include close rivals such as Pan-China Certified Public Accountants, BDO China Shu Lun Pan CPAs, Moore Global, and RSM China.
More than 80 listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen also changed auditors since December, Chinese news outlet Jiemian reported. Chinese regulators have expressed concerns over some smaller firms’ quality of work and ability to handle troubled listed clients.
“The Big Four have grown because of their perceived independence and size, and being global and subject to different regulators reinforces this perception of trust, on which the Western financial system depends,” Harris said.
“While smaller firms should adopt the same internal controls and external regulation, they have to try much harder to justify that trust that it has taken the big names decades to build.”
Updated: 3-13-2023
KPMG Faces Scrutiny For Audits of SVB and Signature Bank
Accounting firm blessed books of two banks weeks before failure.
Silicon Valley Bank failed just 14 days after KPMG LLP gave the lender a clean bill of health. Signature Bank went down 11 days after the accounting firm signed off on its audit.
What KPMG knew about the two banks’ financial situation and what it missed will likely be the subject of regulatory scrutiny and lawsuits.
KPMG signed the audit report for Silicon Valley Bank’s parent, SVB Financial Group, on Feb. 24. Regulators seized the bank on March 10 after a surge of withdrawals threatened to leave it short of cash.
“Common sense tells you that an auditor issuing a clean report, a clean bill of health, on the 16th-largest bank in the United States that within two weeks fails without any warning, is trouble for the auditor,” said Lynn Turner, who was chief accountant of the Securities and Exchange Commission from 1998 to 2001.
Two crucial facts for determining whether KPMG missed the banks’ problems are when the bank runs began in earnest and when the bank’s management and KPMG’s auditors became aware of the crisis.
What is known about Silicon Valley Bank is that deposit outflows accelerated last month. In its March 8 statement, Silicon Valley Bank said “client cash burn has remained elevated and increased further in February.”
The bank said its deposits at the end of February were lower than it had predicted in January.
Both bank audits were for 2022, so auditors weren’t scrubbing the banks’ books when they ran into trouble. But auditors are supposed to highlight risks faced by the companies they audit.
They are also supposed to raise important issues that occur after companies close their books and before the audit is completed.
A spokesman for KPMG declined to comment on the specific audits, due to client confidentiality. In a statement, the firm said it isn’t responsible for things that happen after an audit is completed.
Silicon Valley Bank’s deposits peaked at the end of the first quarter of 2022 and fell $25 billion, or 13%, during the final nine months of the year. That means deposits were declining during the period of KPMG’s audit.
If the decline was affecting the bank’s liquidity when KPMG signed off on the audit report, that information likely should have been included. Since it wasn’t, the question becomes, did KPMG know or should have known what was going on?
Auditors are supposed to warn investors if companies are in trouble. They are required to evaluate “whether there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern” for the next 12 months after the financial statements are issued.
Auditors also use their reports to highlight “critical audit matters” that involve challenging, subjective or complex judgments. KPMG in that section of its report focused on the accounting for credit losses at Silicon Valley Bank.
But it didn’t address Silicon Valley Bank’s ability to continue holding debt securities to maturity—which, in the end, the bank lacked.
Even if the bank wasn’t struggling last year, KPMG was required to evaluate developments that occurred after the balance-sheet date so the company’s financials were presented fairly.
Signature Bank, which was seized by regulators on Sunday, also faced a run last week but it didn’t have the same balance-sheet issues as Silicon Valley Bank. KPMG signed off on its audit on March 1.
Signature’s bet on crypto assets led to a surge in deposits, which went into reverse as that market struggled. A large amount of its deposits were uninsured, making it more likely the customers would flee at any sign of trouble.
But it hadn’t suffered the same losses on its investments as Silicon Valley Bank, giving it a greater ability to pay depositors.
The auditing firm could face additional scrutiny. KPMG also audited First Republic Bank, whose shares were down 76% Monday morning, even after the bank got a liquidity boost from JPMorgan Chase and the Federal Reserve.
KPMG’s audit work likely will be scrutinized by regulators, including the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the SEC, as well private litigants that lost money when Silicon Valley Bank collapsed, said Erik Gordon, a professor at the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business.
A shareholder lawsuit against the firm concerning its Silicon Valley Bank audit “won’t be an easy one for people to win, even though the timing is spectacularly embarrassing for KPMG,” Mr. Gordon said.
A PCAOB spokeswoman said the regulator “cannot comment on ongoing inspection or enforcement matters.” An SEC spokesman declined to comment on the Silicon Valley Bank audit.
One argument KPMG could try in court is that the run on the bank started after the firm signed its audit report. A state banking regulator, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, in a filing Friday said the bank was “in sound financial condition prior to March 9,” when depositors withdrew $42 billion.
Douglas Carmichael, the PCAOB’s chief auditor from 2003 to 2006, said it was unclear how the California regulator could have determined the bank’s financial condition. “It seems like a premature analysis. How could they know without examining?” he said.
“Auditors are always under the microscope when the company fails shortly after the issuance of a clean opinion,” Mr. Carmichael said. “The shorter the period the greater the concern would have to be.”
Silicon Valley Bank almost doubled its assets and deposits during 2021. It got in trouble because it bought long-term, low-yielding bonds with short-term funding from depositors that was repayable upon demand.
Accounting rules said it didn’t have to recognize losses on the assets as long as it didn’t sell them.
When rising interest rates caused the bonds’ value to drop, it got stuck in them, and they kept falling. Silicon Valley Bank still had to maintain enough liquidity to pay withdrawals, which became increasingly difficult.
The $1.8 billion investment loss Silicon Valley Bank disclosed last week stemmed from Silicon Valley Bank’s decision to sell all its “available for sale” securities during the first quarter.
Silicon Valley Bank didn’t say when it started or when it completed the sales. It isn’t clear if Silicon Valley Bank used the proceeds of those sales to help cover withdrawals.
In the March 8 disclosure, Silicon Valley Bank said it expected to reinvest proceeds from the sales. But money is fungible, and it is unclear if selling the available-for-sale securities may have freed up other sources of cash to help pay departing customers.
Most of the capital hole in Silicon Valley Bank’s balance sheet was in government-sponsored mortgage bonds that Silicon Valley Bank classified as “held to maturity.”
That label allowed Silicon Valley Bank to exclude unrealized losses on those holdings from its earnings, equity and regulatory capital.
In a footnote, Silicon Valley Bank said the fair-market value of its held-to-maturity securities was $76.2 billion as of Dec. 31, or $15.1 billion below their balance-sheet value.
The fair-value gap was almost as large as Silicon Valley Bank’s $16.3 billion of total equity—which, KPMG could point out, is something anyone reading the financial statements could have seen.
Silicon Valley Bank stuck to its position that it intended—and had the ability—to hold those bonds to maturity. KPMG allowed the accounting treatment. Now it will be up to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. to sell the securities.
The bank’s troubles put KPMG in a no-win situation. If it had called attention to Silicon Valley Bank’s falling deposits, or issued a warning about Silicon Valley Bank’s ability to continue as a going concern, it could have set off a run on the bank.
By not raising these issues, it will face questions about how it missed the signs that the bank was headed for trouble.
One of the agencies likely to ask pointed questions of KPMG is the FDIC. After a bank fails, the FDIC’s Office of Inspector General regularly conducts investigations and publishes detailed reports called failed-bank reviews that identify the causes of the collapse and the parties most responsible.
Such reports are studied carefully by private litigants eyeing defendants to sue for damages. On that front KPMG caught a break over the weekend: The government said it would backstop all of both banks’ uninsured depositors, in effect helping to bail out KPMG as well. The backstop won’t affect losses suffered by the banks’ investors.
Updated: 3-20-2023
Banks, Investors Revive Push For Changes To Securities Accounting After SVB Collapse
The Financial Accounting Standards Board after the financial crisis weighed fair-value requirements for financial institutions that planned to never sell their debt securities, but reversed course amid widespread industry objections.
Some bank executives and investors are reviving calls for changes to U.S. accounting rules around held-to-maturity securities in the wake of the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, a move that was considered after the financial crisis but largely abandoned after hundreds of banking-industry objections.
If banks designate bonds as held-to-maturity securities, the firms are allowed to exclude unrealized losses on them from equity as long as they don’t sell. Banks have to carry HTM instruments at amortized cost, or an adjusted version of the original price they paid.
Bonds the banks plan to sell need to be classified as available-for-sale securities and accounted for at fair market value. If banks sell any HTM securities, they must reclassify all of their HTM securities as available for sale and potentially take a big loss on the securities they didn’t sell.
SVB had designated 43% of its total assets as HTM securities, which fell in value and led to a buildup in unrealized losses as interest rates rose last year at one of the fastest paces in U.S. history.
Selling those HTM-branded assets—mostly government-backed mortgage bonds—before maturity would have reduced capital to virtually nothing.
But as the bank struggled to maintain its liquidity to fund withdrawals, SVB was able to avoid recognizing the losses by not switching the classification, a position permitted by its auditor, KPMG.
The collapse of SVB, the largest bank to fail since the 2008 financial crisis, recalls accounting issues that plagued that period.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board, which sets accounting rules for U.S. companies, in 2010 proposed requiring banks to record all financial instruments at fair value, or marked to market, a move to provide investors with more information in the fallout of the financial crisis.
Much of the crisis stemmed from illiquid, toxic subprime assets that had to be marked to market. The issue previously came under debate in the early 1990s, in the aftermath of the savings-and-loan crisis.
“Every time there’s stress, the issue comes up,” said Robert Herz, who served as the FASB’s chair when it issued the 2010 proposal.
“If the FASB were to decide to address the issue, it will likely be very controversial and the same arguments on either side will likely be raised again,” said Mr. Herz, who is chairman of Morgan Stanley and Fannie Mae’s audit committees.
Mr. Herz declined to comment on whether the FASB should change accounting rules now.
The FASB doesn’t have a project on its standard-setting agenda related to held-to-maturity accounting. But a FASB spokeswoman said, “as part of our continuing efforts to improve accounting and financial reporting, we’re always open to engaging with our stakeholders on accounting issues.”
Banks vehemently opposed the 2010 plan, saying it would have hurt lending and inaccurately portrayed their business strategies. Opponents of the proposal far outweighed its supporters, who said it would have improved transparency and revealed potential bank weaknesses.
The CFA Institute, which represents investment professionals designated as chartered financial analysts, public pension fund California Public Employees’ Retirement System and the World Bank were among those that backed fair value as the best measure for financial instruments.
The FASB in 2011 scrapped its plan and decided to largely stick with its existing so-called mixed-measurement model, which allows for financial instruments to be treated in a mix of ways.
Financial institutions are permitted to classify debt securities based on management’s intent, business model and their ability to hold them until maturity if the assets’ value were to drop.
More than a decade later, the banking industry’s views are largely unchanged, with industry experts saying that the use of fair-value accounting for all financial instruments with a requirement to reflect the changes each period through the income statement doesn’t reflect the banking business.
The existing rules are sufficient, said Charles Levingston, chief financial officer at Bethesda, Md.-based Eagle Bancorp Inc.
“I’m OK with the designations as they sit today, but I would not be surprised to see additional conversation about this particularly given the nature with which SVB managed its balance sheet,” Mr. Levingston said.
Some bank executives, however, want the FASB to revisit the issue.
Brent Beardall, chief executive of Seattle-based bank Washington Federal Inc., criticized the current mixed-measurement model, saying it allows investors to receive only partial information.
He said the FASB should consider requiring financial institutions to present two balance sheets, one at amortized cost and one at fair value, so that the information is comparable across all classes of assets and liabilities.
“Fair value is a useful piece of information, but it’s only useful if you get all of the information. Picking and choosing is a disaster,” Mr. Beardall said. “I think it’s time that the FASB look at it and provide information to investors the way they want it.”
Timothy Spence, chief executive of Cincinnati-based Fifth Third Bancorp, said in a recent television interview the accounting designations in the differences in the available-for-sale or held-to-maturity treatment need to be addressed.
“There’s no question that what triggered the outflows at Silicon Valley Bank last week was the surprise on the unrealized losses on their securities portfolio because such a significant share of it was embedded in held-to-maturity securities,” Mr. Spence said on CNBC March 13. Fifth Third declined to comment for this article.
Meanwhile, some investors continue to push for accounting requirements they say reflect economic reality. SVB’s billions of dollars in unrealized losses tied to HTM securities would have been clearer to investors if the bank had been obligated to record them at fair value, said Sandy Peters, head of financial reporting policy at the CFA Institute.
Carrying HTM securities at amortized cost can make a bank look good “while the market value of the assets on the balance sheet implodes,” she wrote in a recent report. “SVB would have had virtually no book value if they had marked them to market, but nobody was paying attention,” Ms. Peters said.
The Council of Institutional Investors, which represents pension funds and other large money managers, has long believed that fair-value accounting with robust disclosures provides investors with more useful information than amounts that would be reported under amortized cost or other existing alternative accounting approaches, said Jeff Mahoney, CII’s general counsel.
But it doesn’t oppose existing accounting standards providing for the categorization of held-to-maturity securities, he said.
Updated: 3-22-2023
US lawmakers Reiterate Concerns About ‘Sham’ Crypto Firm Audits To PCAOB
Two U.S. senators cited the collapse of FTX when writing to Public Company Accounting Oversight Board chair Erica Williams in January, but now suggest improper auditing could have affected three banks as well.
United States Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ron Wyden have cited the recent collapse of three major banks to call on the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) to “rein in” audits of crypto firms.
In a March 21 letter to PCAOB chair Erica Williams, Warren and Wyden reiterated the concerns over “shady audits” of crypto companies that the pair raised in January, this time referencing the failures of Silvergate Bank, Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank.
The two senators requested Williams respond to questions on whether improper audits and proof-of-reserve reports “may have played a direct or indirect role” in the collapse of the banks.
“You have ample authority to establish standards for auditors that require any SEC-registered auditor to only conduct audits of crypto firms that comply with existing standards for audit quality,” said the letter.
“Based on the obvious threats to investors and the public interest posed by sham audits, any audits and reviews of crypto firms done by SEC-registered auditors must maintain a high level of scrutiny. Otherwise, these sham audits must be addressed by PCAOB.”
Congress and the Fed weakened stress tests and other rules to prevent big banks from taking on too much risk and crashing the economy — all so banks could make bigger profits. Banks can’t be trusted to regulate themselves. Congress and our regulators need to step up. https://t.co/AVcFr7g3GB
— Elizabeth Warren (@SenWarren) March 21, 2023
Warren and Wyden suggested that defunct crypto exchange FTX, currently in bankruptcy court for Chapter 11 proceedings, could have impacted the events around Silvergate and Signature, given the firm “received sham financial reviews” by auditors registered with the PCAOB, writing:
“In assessing the risks associated with the FTX’s deposits, as well as those of other crypto-related customers, the banks may have relied on the misleading and faulty financial information provided by proof-of-reserve examinations.”
The two senators requested Williams provide a staff-level briefing on March 31 and respond to the questions raised by April 4.
Warren, an outspoken critic of many aspects of the digital asset space, has been pointing to a lack of regulatory oversight as part of the reason behind the failure of the aforementioned banks.
On March 15, she requested that Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell recuse himself from any review of regulatory failures leading to the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank.
PwC Probes Security Incident Tied To Russian-Speaking Clop Cyber Gang
* Accounting Firm Says Event Had ‘Limited Impact’ On Business
* MOVEit Software Flaw Haunts Businesses, Us Government Agencies
A criminal hacking gang has added more names to its lists of alleged victims from a recent campaign that exploited a vulnerability in a popular file-transfer product.
The group, known as Clop, threatened to post internal data from professional services firms Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP and Ernst & Young LLP unless they pay a ransom fee. The scope of the incidents weren’t immediately clear.
The Russian-speaking gang has in recent weeks launched scores of attacks after discovering a vulnerability in MOVEit, a file-sharing software from Progress Software Corp.
Pricewaterhousecoopers in a statement confirmed it used MOVEit software, and that the hack had a “limited impact” on PwC. The firm stopped using the MOVEit platform upon learning of the incident, it said.
“We have reached out to the small number of clients whose files were impacted to discuss the incident,” a company spokesperson said. “Data security is a key priority for PwC and we continue to put the right resources and safeguards in place to protect our network.”
Ernst & Young has previously said it had launched an investigation into its use of the MOVEit tool and “took urgent steps to safeguard any data.”
“We have verified that the vast majority of systems which use this transfer service across our global organization are secure and were not compromised,” the spokesperson said in a statement from June 16.
“We are manually and thoroughly investigating systems where data may have been accessed. Our priority is to first communicate to those impacted, as well as the relevant authorities. Our investigation is ongoing.”
The largest US public pension fund, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, or CalPERS, also said the personal data of about 769,000 members — including Social Security numbers, dates of birth and potentially the names of family members — have been exposed due to the same MOVEit issue.
CalPERS said a third-party vendor that CalPERS used to help make payments to retirees and other beneficiaries notified the company on June 6 that a MOVEit vulnerability allowed data to be downloaded by an unauthorized party.
“This external breach of information is inexcusable,” said CalPERS Chief Executive Officer Marcie Frost in a statement. “Our members deserve better.”
The US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency on June 1 issued an advisory about a vulnerability in MOVEit software, warning that “a cyber threat actor could exploit this vulnerability to take over an affected system.”
Progress has since released a patch to fix the vulnerability, but about 90 companies are so far known to have been affected by the hack, according to cybersecurity researchers.
Last week, Shell Plc said it was investigating a possible data breach after it was targeted by Clop. The gang listed Shell among dozens of other victims including a US university, insurance and manufacturing firms, as well as banks, investment and financial services companies.
US government agencies have also been affected.
Clop has been among the most prolific cybercriminal gangs in recent years, causing hundreds of millions of dollars of damage internationally, according the cybersecurity firm Trend Micro Inc.
In a statement posted on its dark web page last week, Clop invited victims to reach out and negotiate. “We have information on hundreds of companies so our discussion will work very simple,” the gang said, claiming it had downloaded “a lot of your data as part of exceptional exploit.”
Updated: 3-23-2023
McKinsey Starts Cutting 1,400 Jobs This Week in Restructuring
* It’s One Of The Biggest Rounds Of Cuts At The Consulting Giant
* Firm Aims For Attrition Or Voluntary Exits For More Reductions
McKinsey & Co. is embarking on a rare round of major job cuts, with plans to eliminate about 1,400 roles.
The consulting giant, which has seen rapid growth in its headcount over the past decade, is restructuring how it organizes its support teams starting this week, including workforce reductions or moving people into other roles.
The total cuts will amount to about 3% of headcount that has ballooned to almost 47,000 from 28,000 just five years ago and 17,000 in 2012.
Consulting giant McKinsey is embarking on a rare round of major job cuts with plans to eliminate about 1,400 roles.@EdLudlow has more https://t.co/am9iDnxtYF pic.twitter.com/cOztmByRrO
— Bloomberg TV (@BloombergTV) March 28, 2023
“The painful result of this shift is that we will have to say goodbye to some of our firm functions colleagues, while helping others move into new roles that better align to our firm’s strategy and priorities,” Bob Sternfels, global managing partner, wrote in a note to staff.
“Starting now, where local regulations allow, we will begin to notify colleagues who will depart our firm or be asked to change roles.”
The total number of cuts were described by a person with knowledge of the matter, who asked not to be identified because the information isn’t public. A spokesperson declined to comment.
Unlike some of the major financial firms it works with, McKinsey rarely carries out job cuts in its own ranks. Even underperforming employees in client-facing roles tend to depart after being “counseled to leave” — a phrase that indicates the company doesn’t want them on client projects and recommends they try to find a different employer.
The company, where it can, is “implementing reductions through attrition or voluntary departures,” Sternfels wrote.
The firm — known for devising workforce-reduction plans for its clients — had been looking at eliminating about 2,000 jobs, people familiar with the plans told Bloomberg News last month, adding that the number of people to be cut from the firm could still change. Most of the affected roles don’t have direct contact with clients.
McKinsey posted a record $15 billion in revenue in 2021, and surpassed that figure in 2022, a person familiar with the matter said last month.
Consulting firm Accenture Plc said last week it will cut 19,000 jobs — about 2.5% of its workforce — over the next 18 months, one of the largest rounds of dismissals in the sector.
Companies in industries from finance and technology to retailing are reducing staff amid a slowdown in demand and predictions of a looming recession.
Tech giants including Amazon.com Inc. and Microsoft Corp. are making deep cuts, and Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley and other top banks have been eliminating thousands of positions. Facebook parent Meta Platforms Inc. has undertaken two rounds of mass layoffs.
McKinsey’s move comes two years after Sternfels took over as global managing partner following a vote by its roughly 650 senior partners to oust his predecessor, Kevin Sneader.
The management shift was the culmination of a tumultuous period for the firm, which took flak for its role in advising the makers of the painkiller OxyContin and faced scrutiny of various other business ties.
Updated: 3-28-2023
U.S. Audit Watchdog Proposes Move To Get Inspections Started Faster
The PCAOB proposed slashing the period auditors have to assemble final documents on audits to 14 days from 45. That might get material information into investors’ hands faster, the group said.
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board proposed cutting by more than half the amount of time auditors have to assemble final audit documentation, which might allow the audit watchdog to start its inspection process up to a month earlier and provide key information to investors sooner.
The U.S. audit regulator has been working to update more than 30 standards that have gone largely unchanged since they were adopted on an interim basis roughly 20 years ago from the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
With the proposal released Tuesday, the PCAOB suggested consolidating and modernizing four interim standards into one standard on auditors’ core responsibilities, including areas such as professional skepticism, independence, competence and professional judgment.
As part of that update, auditors would have up to 14 days to assemble their final set of audit documentation, as opposed to the 45 days they are now granted. These documents usually help show whether the audit work complied with PCAOB standards.
Most of the documentation in this process, known as archiving, is now occurring electronically, the PCAOB said. Many firms documented at least a portion of their procedures using paper-based systems in 2004, when rules on archiving were set.
Some firms compile the documents in as little as two to four days, while others take the full 45 days.
The PCAOB can’t begin its inspection of any given registered accounting firm until its auditors have put together a final set of audit documentation, a task that has to be done as close as possible to the end of a particular audit.
The PCAOB’s inspection teams select certain completed audits conducted by a firm for review.
By shortening the window to 14 days, the PCAOB could begin its inspection process earlier than usual, putting possibly material information in the hands of investors more quickly.
“This would lead to a waterfall effect that ultimately would provide the opportunity for us to get our inspection reports to investors sooner, enhancing their protection,” PCAOB Chair Erica Williams said on Tuesday.
Ms. Williams, who took the helm of the PCAOB in January 2022, has led several other initiatives at the regulator including dialing up enforcement of rules against audit firms and individual auditors that violate them.
The proposal would also seek to clarify the role of the partner in charge of an audit, particularly when planning, supervising and documenting audit-engagement activities.
This partner needs to review sufficient documentation to make sure that the engagement was performed as planned, a requirement more explicitly laid out under the proposal.
Consolidating the standards is aimed at helping to ease auditors’ understanding and compliance, the PCAOB said.
The public will have until May 30 to weigh in on the proposal, the PCAOB said.
EY Breakup Plan’s Fate May Rest On Executive Showdown This Week
Retired U.S. partners are also fighting the deal, worried about payouts they are owed.
The fate of Ernst & Young’s proposed split may be determined in Silicon Valley this week when feuding executives meet to hash out a deal that is acceptable to all factions.
One of those powerful factions won’t be represented at the meeting and doesn’t even work for the global auditing firm. Yet some of EY’s retired partners are playing a key role in trying to block the deal.
EY this month paused its preparations for the multibillion-dollar breakup, after its U.S. arm demanded a blueprint for the deal be reworked to give auditors a bigger share of the lucrative tax practice.
The unexpected revolt, putting the deal in jeopardy, has provoked infighting and rifts within the 390,000-person firm, according to people familiar with the matter.
This week’s meeting in Palo Alto, Calif., sets the stage for a potential showdown between the breakup plan’s architect, EY’s global leader Carmine Di Sibio, and the person most likely to derail it, EY’s U.S. leader Julie Boland.
Tensions between the two senior executives have escalated sharply in recent weeks, the people familiar with the matter said.
Ms. Boland, EY’s U.S. chair and managing partner, last week said the firm still needed to resolve questions affecting the financial strength of both businesses that will be created by the split.
Mr. Di Sibio responded with a direct appeal to EY’s 13,000 partners, telling them in an email they had “the right to vote on whether to proceed with a transaction,” according to a copy of his message reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.
The power struggle between the duo reflects the unusual structure of EY and other big accounting firms. Mr. Di Sibio runs EY’s global network, but needs approval from dozens of independent firms for the breakup.
Ms. Boland, as the head of the most powerful of those member firms, effectively holds sway over some 40% of EY’s global revenues.
There is also no guarantee the warring factions of EY can agree to a compromise deal. The U.S. demands to strengthen the audit-focused firm, at the expense of the new consulting company, could affect the amount raised by the split.
That in turn could reduce the windfalls for partners, making the deal less attractive to the U.K. and other overseas EY firms that lined up behind the original blueprint.
U.S. opposition to the deal, and criticism of Mr. Di Sibio, has also come from scores of retired EY partners, including former leaders of the firm.
Retired EY partners don’t get to vote on the deal. But they are an influential contingent. Many retain connections to the firm via friends or family, such as retired partner Jim Boland, who is Ms. Boland’s father.
Some retired partners serve as executives or board members at major companies, making them valuable as clients or potential clients.
Their central concern involves money. EY has around $7 billion of promised payouts to its retired U.S. partners that aren’t backed by a specific pot of money.
Retired partners worry the audit-focused firm, weakened by the sale of the consulting arm, may not generate sufficient earnings to meet these pension-style commitments in future, according to memos reviewed by the Journal.
“We are the largest creditors of the company and want to make sure our rights are protected,” one retired U.S. partner said.
EY’s leadership has pledged to use some of the estimated $30 billion that would be raised by the deal to increase the funding for retired partners, according to people familiar with the matter.
The firm has set up a committee to represent the retired partners, and agreed to pay for lawyers and actuaries to advise them, the memos reviewed by the Journal show.
But that may not be enough to quell the retirees’s revolt, which has morphed from concerns about pension obligations to questioning the benefits of doing a deal at all.
Four former EY leaders this month said there remained “significant questions…around the necessary strength EY must have” after any spinoff, according to a copy of their joint statement seen by the Journal.
Even if EY’s leaders succeed in overcoming the current impasse, retired partners could prove a continuing roadblock to getting a deal done. One group, who are organizing opposition to the deal online via Facebook and emails, recently appointed a law firm to advise on their rights, according to a memo reviewed by the Journal.
The start of that legal work has been delayed, while work on the deal itself is paused, the memo said.
Updated: 3-31-2023
EY Fails To Reach Deal On Split
Opposition to breakup plan is being led by two longtime U.S. auditors.
The unexpected revolt that has upended the planned breakup of accounting firm Ernst & Young is being driven by two longtime U.S. auditors who believe their part of the firm could end up weakened by a deal.
John King and Frank Mahoney, senior U.S. EY executives, have emerged as key opponents to the firm’s plan for a worldwide split of its auditing and consulting arms, according to people familiar with the matter.
After a year of planning and tens of millions of dollars in costs, the split of the 390,000-person accounting firm was put on hold earlier this month. A meeting in Silicon Valley this week failed to reach a deal.
Carmine Di Sibio, EY’s global leader, and Julie Boland, head of the firm’s U.S. arm, said in a joint statement Friday they were “continuing to work toward a transaction.” The deal is “very complicated, and we agree it is critical that we get the key elements right,” the statement added.
The stalemate dates back to earlier this month. Mr. King, EY’s U.S. head of auditing, and his predecessor, Mr. Mahoney, used a meeting of EY’s U.S. leadership to push back on the planned breakup, the people familiar with the matter said.
The two executives convinced EY U.S. chief Ms. Boland that the auditors should get a greater share of EY’s multibillion-dollar tax practice, according to people familiar with the matter.
Ms. Boland would lead the global audit firm, should the split go ahead. Mr. Di Sibio is expected to lead the new consulting firm.
As U.S. leader, Ms. Boland could have forced through the blueprint with the support of two-thirds of the U.S. executive committee, the people familiar with the matter said. But she was reluctant to ignore the concerns of the two senior auditor representatives and their supporters, the people added.
A group of powerful retired U.S. EY partners, including former leaders of the firm, is also fighting the split, people familiar with the matter said. They are concerned about the future of the auditing firm, which is on the hook for the firm’s pension payments.
An official committee representing U.S. retired partners has had discussions with Ms. Boland, according to emails viewed by The Wall Street Journal.
Ms. Boland this month appeared to support the need to rethink the deal, telling the Journal that “people are asking the right questions, and we’re making sure we’re getting those questions answered.” She demanded changes to the template for the breakup.
The U.S. is the most powerful of the scores of member firms that make up EY’s global network. A deal would be extremely difficult without U.S. participation.
Mr. King and Mr. Mahoney, who now leads the firm’s U.S. West region, didn’t respond to requests for comment. A spokesman for EY’s U.S. firm said “it would be impossible for a handful of people to derail the process under the U.S. firm’s governance rules.”
The surprise upending of the carefully orchestrated deal preparations has caused disruption and infighting at the firm.
Mr. Di Sibio, EY’s global chairman and chief executive, said in a recent internal email the firm’s 13,000 partners are “overwhelmingly in favor” of doing a deal, according to a copy viewed by the Journal.
Even if that is the case, there appears little that he or any of EY’s overseas firm leaders can do to push through a global deal should the U.S. firm’s leadership remain opposed.
This week’s meeting of EY’s global executives included Mr. Di Sibio and U.S. leader Ms. Boland, but not the U.S. auditors who balked at the original proposal, according to one of the people familiar with the matter.
The mood was broadly positive, but progress was limited because the U.S. firm is still working on an alternative template for the split, the person added.
EY’s leaders are looking at getting an agreement done in the next few weeks, according to one of the people familiar with the matter. The longer the uncertainty drags on, the greater the damage to the firm, industry watchers said.
One central concern is the impact on clients. Mr. Di Sibio in his recent email to partners said media coverage of the troubled transaction had led to “a larger volume of client questions being received and discussions being held.”
Rohit Deshpande, a marketing professor at Harvard Business School, said the delays to carrying out the split risked causing confusion about what the EY brand now represents.
“Clients are getting mixed messages as to whether strategically this was a good idea or not,” Mr. Deshpande said. “Speed is absolutely of the essence.”
The uncertain fate of the deal is also affecting staff morale, according to people familiar with the matter and messages on employee websites.
“This is an unmitigated disaster,” one EY employee wrote recently on Fishbowl. Another said they have “never been more embarrassed of this firm.”
Responding to the tensions between global leader Mr. Di Sibio and U.S. chief Ms. Boland, another EY employee commented: “Will someone pull these two aside and say please stop! Neither of you are helping the situation right now.”
The turmoil at EY could make competing firms look more appealing for employees, who are not in line for the multimillion-dollar payouts promised to partners should the deal go ahead.
That risk is heightened by the current widespread shortage of accountants, according to Troy Janes, accounting professor at Purdue University and a former EY auditor.
“If your firm seems like it’s not a fun place to be anymore, there’s other firms out there who would be more than happy to hire you away because they need people,” Mr. Janes said.
Updated: 4-11-2023
Ernst & Young Halts Breakup Plan After Revolt By U.S. Leaders
EY spent more than $100 million on split between auditing, consulting business.
Ernst & Young has axed its plan for a split of its auditing and consulting arms, marking a dramatic and costly retreat from a proposal that was meant to reshape the accounting profession but ended amid bitter infighting at the firm.
Global leaders of the Big Four firm said Tuesday they were “stopping work on the project” because the heads of EY’s U.S. arm, the biggest member of the global network, had decided not to move forward, according to a note sent to EY’s 13,000 partners.
Rather than creating two dynamic firms, EY is now left with a potential leadership vacuum, thousands of angry partners, a split between its U.S. and overseas partnerships and confused clients.
EY spent more than a year and over $100 million on the effort only to see it upended by a small group of senior U.S. executives.
“This is the beginning of a real period of nastiness,” said an EY U.S. partner who favored the deal.
EY’s global leaders said in the note to partners that they remained committed to the principle of splitting the auditing and consulting businesses.
But it isn’t clear how a split could be redesigned in a way that achieves consensus, given the failure of intense negotiations over recent weeks to rescue the deal.
“We thought we had something everyone would sign up to,” one person close to the deal said. “This means going back to the drawing board.”
The failure of the project marks a humiliating rebuff for Carmine Di Sibio, EY’s global chairman and chief executive, who championed the planned split.
Mr. Di Sibio had originally been scheduled to retire in June but was granted a two-year extension to see the proposal through and was nominated to lead the newly created consulting firm.
His plans were undone by a revolt among U.S. audit leaders who complained that the consulting business was getting the bulk of the firm’s lucrative tax business.
The auditors, joined by an influential group of retired partners, were concerned that the split would leave the audit business too weak to compete.
EY now faces a potential leadership crisis at the top of the 390,000-person firm. Mr. Di Sibio and EY’s overseas leaders who supported the breakup have lost credibility for failing to deliver on it.
Staff members are angry about the uncertainty the plan created and cost cuts imposed on them to boost profitability.
Julie Boland, the chief of EY’s U.S. arm and a potential leader of the firm, may struggle to command global support. She was due to head the new audit-focused partnership, but was unable to unite her executives behind the breakup plan.
The split entailed getting approval from partners in dozens of countries and hinged on a complicated plan to raise cash to pay millions of dollars to the audit partners for giving up the consulting business.
That plan faced headwinds from rising interest rates and volatile markets. EY had planned for the consulting business to borrow billions of dollars and raise billions more from an IPO to pay auditing partners, as well as fund pensions for retired partners.
Ms. Boland and other U.S. leaders said Tuesday that they would support a breakup at the right time, but also laid out their demands for change, according to a copy of an internal note viewed by The Wall Street Journal.
The firm needs to simplify its structure, invest in its most strategic businesses and modernize its governance, the note said. “These actions will also better prepare us to execute on transaction options in the future,” it said.
EY’s effort was closely watched in the accounting industry, which has moved aggressively into consulting operations despite potential conflicts of interest. EY hoped to create a template that other leading firms would be forced to follow.
Mr. Di Sibio said in December that the firm’s “competitors are jealous in terms of what we’re doing,” according to a copy of a webcast viewed by the Journal.
Instead of creating a model for the future of the profession, EY appears instead to have proved its doubters right. Joe Ucuzoglu, the global chief executive of rival Big Four firm Deloitte, last month said history was littered with examples of proposed transactions that “sounded great [with] pretty slide decks [and] lots of big promises” that never played out as intended.
Rival firms will likely try to poach disaffected EY partners, now that multimillion-dollar bonuses promised under the split appear to have evaporated, according to people familiar with the matter.
Cost-cutting to boost profit margins in the U.S. firm, including a suspension of the midyear bonus employees hoped to receive earlier this year, has added to staff frustration, the people said.
Differences over the planned split have riven EY’s U.S. firm, which contributes some 40% of the firm’s $45 billion in annual global revenue, according to people familiar with the matter.
Most of the executive committee backed the proposed deal, the people said, but U.S. managing partner Ms. Boland refused to override the objections of a handful of senior audit leaders.
The apparent ability of a few U.S. executives to wreck a deal affecting thousands of partners, in scores of countries, frustrated the global leadership.
Mr. Di Sibio told partners this month that the “overwhelming majority” backed the deal and that they had the right to vote on whether to go ahead.
The U.S. leaders in their note also focused on the growing financial challenges to the deal. Tougher economic and market conditions mean the “transaction economics have become challenged,” the leaders added, according to their note.
Mr. Di Sibio launched the plan, known as Project Everest, to address a longstanding limitation on the growth of the firm’s consulting business. Many countries prevent firms from doing consulting work for companies they audit.
That limited the pool of prospective consulting clients and companies the consulting firm could work with. This was a big issue for EY, which audits most of the large tech companies, meaning they couldn’t join with them on tech consulting contracts.
“The fact that this deal, as constructed, now seems unlikely to go ahead, doesn’t mean that the thinking that underpinned it was wrong,” said Fiona Czerniawska, chief executive of research firm Source.
“Clients are still looking for different delivery models, and EY’s specific constraint—the extent to which the firm can partner with big technology firms—remains just as urgent an issue to resolve.”
The breakup plan created uncertainty among the thousands of new graduates that EY needs to recruit every year. Jeffrey Johanns, accounting professor at the University of Texas at Austin, said some of his students graduating with master’s degrees in accounting and job offers from EY have been concerned about the implications of the split and its related turmoil.
The students hadn’t received start dates at EY, unlike their peers at the other Big Four firms, he said.
Updated: 5-7-2023
Deloitte Integrates Blockchain For Digital Credentials
The credentials will “have multiple use cases,” including regulatory compliance for banking and decentralized finance, age verification for e-commerce, private logins and fundraising.
Big Four accounting firm Deloitte has integrated blockchain technology to allow customers to store verification credentials in a single digital wallet to streamline the “typically inefficient” verification processes.
In a May 4 statement, Deloitte announced it has integrated KILT Protocol technology — a Polkadot parachain — to enable the issuance of reusable digital credentials to its customers.
The integration aims to improve the efficiency of Deloitte’s Know Your Customer (KYC) and Know Your Business (KYB) verification processes.
In the statement, Deloitte said the standard and “typically inefficient” processes, including KYC and KYB certificates being issued on paper, and identity verification requests requiring multiple data points when only one is needed, often create “extra work in the process.“
Additionally, these traditional verification procedures store data and personal information across multiple platforms and databases, placing consumer data privacy at risk.
Establish a digital identity with Deloitte and keep control of your data, sharing only the data you want to share. We are launching a credential verifier, in partnership with @Kiltprotocol and @Polkadot. Applications opening soon. #KYC #Blockchain #Web3
https://t.co/NDkUf9XMqk— Deloitte Switzerland (@DeloitteCH) May 4, 2023
The credentials will serve various use cases, including regulatory compliance for banking and decentralized finance (DeFi), age verification for e-commerce, private logins and fundraising.
While the wallet will be stored on the customer’s device and remain under their control at all times, Deloitte retains the ability to modify if circumstances change, as noted in the statement:
“Credentials are digitally signed by Deloitte. Deloitte can revoke credentials using blockchain technology if conditions of the customer have changed after the credential was issued.”
The company added that no prior knowledge of blockchain is required from customers to set up the credential wallet.
KILT Protocol founder Ingo Rübe said that the streamlined identity solutions built on KILT allow customers to use verifiable digital credentials across multiple services while maintaining control “over when and where to share personal information.”
As a Polkadot parachain, it also provides the “scale and security needed by enterprise partners,” he added.
Polkadot tweeted shortly after the announcement on May 4, saying that Deloitte leveraging KILT’s solutions to support its KYC and KYB processes is vital for safeguarding itself against illegal activity.
2/ Deloitte will leverage KILT’s reusable digital identity credentials to support its Know Your Customer / Know Your Business processes (KYC/KYB) – vital for protecting financial institutions against fraud, corruption, money laundering and terrorist financing.
— Polkadot (@Polkadot) May 4, 2023
This comes after reports on April 26 that there were over 300 crypto-related job opportunities available at Deloitte, with almost all of them being posted in the same week.
Meanwhile, searching for crypto-related job openings at the other Big Four accounting firms, Ernst & Young, KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers, showed no results.
Updated: 5-10-2023
Auditors Didn’t Flag Risks Building Up In Banks
Bond losses such as those at Silicon Valley Bank could have been raised as ‘critical audit matters’.
When KPMG LLP gave Silicon Valley Bank a clean bill of health just 14 days before the lender collapsed, the Big Four audit firm flagged potential losses on loans as a so-called critical audit matter.
But the audit opinion was silent on what actually brought down the bank—its unrealized bond losses and ability to hold them given a reliance on potentially flighty deposits.
“The auditors failed to mention the fire in the basement or the box of dynamite on the first floor, but they did point out the peeling paint on the flower box,” said Erik Gordon, a University of Michigan business professor. “How could they miss the interest-rate risk?”
The current banking crisis is the first big test of critical audit matters, a measure designed to help investors decode risks and uncertainties buried in financial statements.
Audit regulator Public Company Accounting Oversight Board introduced critical audit matters in 2017 to “breathe life into the audit report.” Described as the biggest shake-up in audits in 70 years, the new standard was meant to make audit opinions more useful to investors.
So far, though, critical audit matters have failed to shed light on issues that have caused a collapse of confidence among depositors and investors in many small and midsize banks.
Auditors are required to record any critical audit matters when they sign off on a public company’s books. Regulators define these as matters that have a significant impact on the financial statements and involve “especially challenging, subjective or complex” judgments by the auditors.
Silicon Valley Bank’s unrealized losses in its bond portfolio appear to “meet every definition of a possible critical audit matter,” said Martin Baumann, a former chief auditor at the PCAOB who had a leading role in designing the new measure.
The latest banking crisis has exposed the gamble some banks took in betting heavily on long-term government bonds, which last year plunged in value as the Federal Reserve raised interest rates.
Banks can keep these losses off their books by classifying their bondholdings as “held to maturity,” or intended never to be sold, allowing them to be held at cost rather than fair value.
The banking industry last year relied more heavily on this accounting maneuver, as rising rates pummeled balance sheets.
Accounting rules say banks can classify bonds as held to maturity only if they have both the intent and ability to hold on to them, rather than having to sell them to meet demands for withdrawals. For well-capitalized banks, that likely isn’t a tough judgment call to make.
But it is a much more nuanced issue for many of the lenders at the center of the latest banking crisis. Unlike the biggest banks, smaller banks are largely reliant on deposits for funding, which can prove flighty in stressed times, calling into question a bank’s ability to indefinitely hold long-term assets.
The parent of Silicon Valley Bank, SVB Financial Group, had $91 billion of held-to-maturity bonds on its Dec. 31 balance sheet, which a footnote said had a fair value of just $76 billion. That $15 billion loss was big enough to wipe out most of the bank’s total equity of $16 billion at year-end.
The lender’s total deposits had shrunk from the previous year, its financial statements showed. What’s more, its reported cash was only around 8% of total deposits, heightening the risk it would need to sell long-term assets if significant numbers of its depositors left.
That appears to tick all the boxes for the auditor to highlight this issue as a critical audit matter. “The judgment as to whether or not Silicon Valley Bank had the ability to hold these securities to maturity was certainly a complex question, it was material to investors, and it is hard to see how liquidity was not a matter for discussion with the audit committee,” said Mr. Baumann, who is also a former senior partner at Big Four audit firm PricewaterhouseCoopers.
“I’m not the auditor of the bank and I don’t know if this [bonds issue] should have been included in the auditor’s report,” he added. “But as the lead author of the standard, this certainly is the kind of item that we had in mind for critical audit matters.”
Representatives of the accounting industry pushed back on suggestions auditors should have sounded the alarm ahead of the crisis. Dennis McGowan, vice president of professional practice at the Center for Audit Quality, said accounting standards don’t require companies to anticipate “extremely remote” scenarios in deciding whether they can classify bonds as held to maturity.
“Some of what’s happened could not have been anticipated. Social media fueled the withdrawals from one bank, for example,” Mr. McGowan said. “Auditors don’t have a crystal ball to anticipate that kind of thing.”
KPMG’s audit of Silicon Valley Bank could be tested in court if shareholders decide to include the firm in the likely lawsuits.
“The lack of a relevant critical audit matter and of a going concern are going to come up if it comes to litigation,” said Jack Castonguay, an accounting professor at Hofstra University.
He added that it was difficult to judge KPMG’s audit without seeing the firm’s work papers or knowing what risks it discussed with SVB’s audit committee.
A KPMG spokesman declined to comment. In response to a request for comment to SVB’s successor bank, a spokeswoman for the Federal Reserve cited the regulator’s description of the bank’s failure as a “textbook case of mismanagement.” She declined to comment on KPMG’s audit of the lender.
Auditors’ apparent blind spot on the interplay of interest-rate and liquidity risks isn’t confined to Silicon Valley Bank.
Auditors for nine other U.S. banks most exposed to bond losses also didn’t flag this as an issue when they signed off on the financial statements for 2022, according to an analysis by The Wall Street Journal.
The Journal reviewed the audit opinions for the 10 small to midsize U.S. banks that last year reported the highest losses on held-to-maturity securities as a proportion of their shareholder equity, based on data from research-firm Calcbench. Silicon Valley Bank ranked second on the list.
None of the auditors included a critical audit matter related to the bank’s treatment of the bonds. Instead, nine of the 10 reported a critical audit matter for estimated losses from loans or other bad debts.
That is the risk that brought down banks in the 2008 financial crisis. Auditors didn’t report any critical audit matter for one of the banks, the analysis found.
A PCAOB spokeswoman declined to comment on whether the lack of critical audit matters related to the latest crisis was a reflection of the effectiveness of the measure.
“Unfortunately CAMS have not been used as fully as we had hoped for,” the former regulator Mr. Baumann said.
Updated: 5-24-2023
PwC Australia Tax Scandal Fuels Global Implications: Explained
* Leak Of Tax Info May Involve US Companies, Hurt PwC Reputation
* Treasury Has Referred Matter For Potential Criminal Probe
As PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Australia tax scandal moves into a new phase, the ramifications are likely to stretch far beyond Australia’s borders.
The scandal deals with an Australia-specific matter: PwC Australia’s misuse of confidential government tax information. But any investigation, like the one that Australia’s Treasury asked for on Wednesday, could extend into the US, in part because PwC’s Australia partners are believed to have shared the information with clients in the US. PwC’s US and UK affiliates have already expressed concerns.
While it isn’t yet clear whether other parts of PwC could be held liable for PwC Australia’s actions, the scandal also could deal a big hit to PwC’s global reputation, especially in the wake of a series of scandals at Big Four accounting firms in recent years that have called their ethics and performance into question.
PwC Australia says it “will continue to cooperate fully with any investigations into this matter.” The firm’s global governing body and the US and UK affiliates declined further comment.
Here’s a closer look at the fallout from the scandal.
What Did PwC Australia Do?
PwC partners took confidential information that a PwC executive had obtained while he was on a government advisory board—information detailing the government’s plans to crack down on corporate tax avoidance—and used it to solicit corporate clients to use the firm’s tax-planning advice, according to emails that were released after demands from Australia’s Parliament.
“This leak breaks every ethical rule in accounting,” said Richard Murphy, an accounting professor at Sheffield University in the UK. “There’s a fundamental conflict between governments’ reliance on big accounting firms for tax advice when these same firms are advising companies on how to avoid these taxes.”
As a result, PwC Australia CEO Tom Seymour and two other top executives have stepped down, and PwC has brought in an outside executive to conduct an independent review of the firm.
The Treasury has referred the matter to the Australian Federal Police and asked them to consider launching a criminal investigation.
What Are The Implications Outside Australia?
Like the other Big Four firms, PwC is structured globally as a network of individual, freestanding affiliates in each country where it does business.
That allows a firm in one country to avoid liability for the actions of the same network’s affiliate in another country, so it isn’t yet known whether PwC might bear any liability globally or in the US or UK for the actions of its Australian affiliate.
According to the emails, however, PwC Australia partners shared the proprietary information with clients that are believed to have included big US technology companies. And whether or not liability is established, the scandal is expected to impact PwC’s reputation worldwide.
Australian Sen. Deborah O’Neill, head of the Australian Parliament’s powerful Financial Services Committee, said earlier this month that the PwC emails contain references to Singapore, the UK, Ireland, the US and the EU, and “it’s clear this is an issue with global implications.”
Has This Type of Concern Arisen Before?
PwC and two other Big Four firms, KPMG and EY, all settled with the US government over their promotion and disclosure of tax shelters in the late 1990s and early 2000s.
In the most prominent such case, KPMG admitted to criminal conduct and paid $456 million in 2005 as part of a settlement to avoid criminal prosecution.
Updated: 6-6-2023
U.S. Regulator Proposes More Active Role For Auditors In Detecting Companies’ Law Violations
Audit watchdog PCAOB wants to require auditors to focus on any noncompliance that could have a material effect on corporate financial statements.
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board wants auditors to take a more proactive role in flagging potential fraud at clients, requiring them to identify areas of noncompliance that could have a material impact on companies’ financial statements.
Under the current rule, auditors of public companies need to identify laws that they believe have a direct and material impact on the financial statements of their clients and detect illegal acts that fit that criteria.
Auditors don’t need to follow any plans or procedures to detect noncompliance by clients that have an indirect effect on their financials. Auditors also must communicate to the company’s audit committee about any illegal acts as soon as feasible before they issue their annual audit report.
The PCAOB now wants auditors to adopt a more active role in these situations.
A proposal floated Tuesday, by a 3-2 vote, would require auditors to perform procedures to identify the laws and regulations with which noncompliance could reasonably have a material effect on companies’ financial statements during their initial risk assessment, regardless of whether those effects are direct or indirect.
That could involve auditors asking executives about any correspondence they have had with regulators over suspected or actual instances of fraud.
Auditors would have to know every law or regulation relevant to companies’ operations—but not necessarily every law to which they are subject—for example, environmental laws for a chemical company. Other audit standards already require auditors to have a basic grasp of their clients’ regulatory environment.
The existing standard could be interpreted to allow auditors to have limited responsibilities with respect to noncompliance with certain laws and regulations unless they happen to stumble across the information, PCAOB Chair Erica Williams said Tuesday.
“The new standard makes clear what investors already expect—that it is the auditor’s responsibility to proactively be on guard for all noncompliance that may have a material impact on the financial statements,” Williams said.
Under the proposal, auditors also would have to assess whether they need outside experts, such as lawyers or engineers, in evaluating information once they have become aware a client violated or may have violated the law.
Auditors currently need to consult with specialists only if executives don’t sufficiently show the company didn’t commit an illegal act.
The proposal also strengthens requirements around how auditors convey their findings to others. Auditors would have to notify the company’s audit committee once they become aware of potential noncompliance and then again after they have evaluated such information.
Board members Duane DesParte and Christina Ho opposed the proposal, saying it could pose a significant cost to auditors and expand the scope of their duties beyond their core abilities. Ho said the proposed requirements aren’t fully transparent about the extensive new responsibilities to be imposed on auditors.
DesParte said he is “increasingly concerned” that the proposal and other items on the PCAOB’s standard-setting agenda will fundamentally alter the role of auditors without a full, transparent vetting of the implications, including a comprehensive understanding of the overall cost-benefit ramifications.
The current rule on illegal acts has gone largely unchanged since the PCAOB adopted it in 2003, shortly after the board was formed.
The standard is among many that the U.S. audit watchdog was allowed to copy on an interim basis from the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, a professional association. The AICPA standard itself hasn’t undergone major revisions since 1988.
There have been several changes to U.S. laws and auditing standards in the 35-year window, particularly the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which set up whistleblower programs and required certain businesses and their auditors to report on the adequacy of internal controls over financial reporting.
Tuesday’s move followed another recent proposal by the PCAOB aimed at preventing fraud. In December, the watchdog suggested tightening the requirements around how audit firms obtain and verify outside evidence about their clients, such as from customers and lenders.
Updated: 6-21-2023
Marcum To Settle SEC, PCAOB Claims Over Widespread Failures In SPAC Audits
The New York-based accounting firm known for its work with blank-check companies agreed to pay $13 million in fines as well as add an audit committee and a ‘chief quality officer’.
The Securities and Exchange Commission and its audit watchdog charged accounting firm Marcum with systemic failures in its quality controls and violations of auditing standards tied to work for hundreds of special-purpose acquisition companies and other clients.
New York-based Marcum agreed on Wednesday to pay a combined $13 million to settle the investigations, $10 million to the SEC and $3 million to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, without admitting or denying the claims, the regulators said.
One of the most prolific auditors of SPAC clients, Marcum failed to comply with standards related to areas such as audit documentation, engagement quality reviews, risk assessments, audit committee communications and engagement partner supervision across hundreds of SPAC audits, the SEC said.
The securities regulator said it found violations in 25% to 50% of the audits it reviewed.
Nor did Marcum design or implement an adequate system of quality control tied to certain audit standards or other key parts of these controls, including researching prospective clients’ business practices before accepting them, the SEC said.
The deficiencies occurred as Marcum more than tripled its number of public-company clients, the majority of which were SPACs, over a three-year period, according to the SEC.
The firm served as auditor on more than 400 SPAC initial public offerings in 2020 and 2021, the SEC said.
During the SPAC boom, Marcum “prioritized increased revenue over audit quality,” Gurbir Grewal, director of the SEC’s enforcement division, said in a statement.
“From 2020 through 2021, the market saw more than 860 SPACs complete IPOs and Marcum audited nearly half of them, without adequate consideration for its ability to serve as gatekeepers.”
By June 2021, Marcum had 882 SPAC clients, the SEC said, up from 113 the previous September. Those figures, though, included “clients to whom Marcum had only sent out a draft engagement letter,” but were never subsequently turned away, the SEC said.
The 2020 and 2021 boom of SPAC mergers, in which a privately held firm combines with a public blank-check company to allow the private company’s shares to trade publicly, dwindled amid the broader market downturn.
The SEC reviewed SPAC accounting and disclosures more closely during the sudden rise in these transactions, for example, saying in 2021 that some SPACs had improperly accounted for warrants sold or given to investors.
The SEC warnings led to a surge in companies restating their financials, which has since dropped off.
The PCAOB, in addition to fining Marcum and requiring certain training for all audit staff, said the accounting firm must make functional changes to its supervisory structure related to the firm’s system of quality control—a first for the watchdog.
Marcum will have to create the role of and hire a “chief quality officer” to oversee its quality control system as well as form an audit committee to provide oversight on the auditing business. The PCAOB said it closely coordinated with the SEC on its investigation.
A Marcum spokesman said the firm is working closely with an independent consultant to ensure that it fully meets PCAOB audit standards. “This process with the SEC and PCAOB identified critical areas for improvement in the firm’s internal quality control and documentation processes,” he said.
“We remain committed to maintaining the full confidence of our clients, regulators and investors,” the spokesman added.
Updated: 7-18-2023
Big Four Accounting Firms Pare Their Consultant Ranks In Postpandemic Reversal
Professional-services giants are facing the consequences of aggressive hiring over the past two years, coupled with less attrition than they expected.
The Big Four accounting firms are trimming their consulting ranks—sometimes months after a promotion—after forecasting slower growth as more businesses scale back on third-party help in certain areas.
The firms—Deloitte, Ernst & Young, KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers—are facing the consequences of aggressive hiring over the past two years as the pandemic spurred higher demand for consulting in areas such as corporate strategy, coupled with lower attrition than they expected during the first half of the year.
The recent rounds of layoffs have been heavily focused on the advisory sides of the firms. KPMG laid off about 5% of its U.S. staff in June—including advisory, tax and back-office people—four months after cutting some advisory personnel, nearly 2% of U.S. staff.
In April in the U.S., Deloitte cut 1.5% of its staff and EY 5%. PwC said its U.S. unit hasn’t had layoffs and isn’t planning any.
Outside the Big Four, Grant Thornton let go 3% of its U.S. staff in May.
While hiring soared in the wake of the pandemic, other data sets show exits were also rising. In the U.S. at the four firms, exits—both voluntary and not—have generally climbed each year since at least 2019, according to a review of online professional profiles by Revelio Labs, a provider of workplace data. In 2022, roughly 56,600 people collectively left the firms, up 8.3% from a year earlier in the Revelio data.
But that scenario flipped this year, even amid layoffs. Exits at the four big firms have dropped, falling 11.6% through June from the year-earlier period, to about 21,400 in the U.S., according to Revelio.
“Life became more flexible and folks have found reasons to stay where they might have been ground to a fine powder prior years,” said Michael Shaub, an accounting professor at Texas A&M University, referring to remote work and salary increases that might have kept some from resigning this year. “Now the firms are saying we can’t keep all these people.”
EY and KPMG declined to comment for this article, and Deloitte didn’t respond to a request for comment.
PwC said it expects to report an increase this year in its global workforce from the nearly 328,000 it reported last year, adding individual staffing decisions are based on local circumstances.
Consulting Strain
Consulting work exposes firms to more fluctuation in revenues, which can be particularly damaging in a slower economy, compared with auditing, which is a mandatory expense for public companies.
Clients are still working with consultants to pour more investment into building out their tech capabilities, for example, further applying artificial intelligence throughout the business.
But they also have slowed their mergers-and-acquisitions activity and need for related support such as due diligence.
“Client demand isn’t shrinking, but it’s certainly changing shape, so they need more experts in one field and need fewer in another,” said Fiona Czerniawska, chief executive of consulting-industry analyst Source Global Research.
U.S. and global consulting is expected to experience much lower growth through 2025 than in the boom times of 2021 and early 2022, Czerniawska said.
The global consulting market is projected to expand by 6% to 10% this year, putting its size between $245 billion and $252 billion, building on a 10.7% increase in 2022, according to a Source report from February.
In the U.S., consulting is expected to grow by 10.6% to $97.31 billion this year, rising at roughly the same 10.5% pace as last year but down from an 11.1% rate in 2021, Source said.
The Big Four firms’ global advisory revenue collectively has more than doubled since 2010, to $94 billion in 2022 from $39 billion a decade earlier, as the audit business comprised an increasingly smaller portion of total revenue, a review of annual reports show.
The firms also square off with consulting giants such as Accenture and Bain & Co. Accenture reported $61.59 billion in revenue for the year ended in August 2022, up roughly 22% from the prior-year period, a filing showed.
Consulting in the U.S. has been generally more recession-resilient than in other countries, but there are signs that businesses are putting more projects on the back burner.
Seventy-seven percent of U.S. consulting clients said they have canceled at least some existing projects, according to a Source survey released in June.
The loss of consulting revenue from key corporations is also raising concerns. Large companies across industries account for most of the falloff in global consulting demand, because they are reallocating their spending as a way to boost efficiencies, according to a report released last week by Kennedy Research Reports, which tracks the consulting industry.
But Czerniawska said smaller, less strategic projects remain more likely to be cut back, suggesting that, on average, the large firms are doing better than small and midsize ones.
Staffing Cuts
The uncertainty around future consulting demand is occasionally visible in the timing of dismissals and recruitment, for instance, the laying off workers in sporadic bursts, cutting people within six months of promoting them or delaying the start dates of new hires.
Balancing supply and demand in consulting firms is particularly difficult when clients’ needs are changing quickly and unpredictably, Czerniawska said.
But the firms, some of which focus on individual performance as the basis for cuts, risk losing stature if they slash a sizable chunk of jobs at once.
“If you promote and then you realize you need to make people redundant, that doesn’t sound like a great way of doing it, but some firms are clearly taking that approach,” Czerniawska said. “Everybody tries to manage this in a low-key way, because of the reputational damage of taking out too many people too publicly.”
Consulting is also particularly prone to layoffs because clients increasingly expect specialized skills and experience with certain tools and data, unlike 20 years ago when consultants more freely moved from one area to another, Czerniawska said.
“Firms don’t have much choice except to lay people off from one area when they might be recruiting in another because the services they’re delivering are becoming more specialized,” she said.
Consulting firms’ net head count growth will likely be lower this year than it has been in recent years, though it varies widely by practice, said Andrew Nicholas, a research analyst at investment bank William Blair & Co.
If demand hasn’t fallen off a cliff and attrition is lower, firms will have fewer open roles to fill, reducing the number of job postings, he said. “You would anticipate that to help bridge that gap,” he said.
U.S. job postings at KPMG, Deloitte and EY across all business lines dropped 76% in July compared with a year earlier, said William Blair, which doesn’t track PwC due to an inability to determine the number of positions on its internal job postings board.
Updated: 7-25-2023
Accounting Watchdog Expects Deficiencies In 40% Of Public-Company Audits In 2022
Audit firms point to staff turnover and reliance on less-experienced workers for PCAOB’s findings. Chair Erica Williams calls findings ‘completely unacceptable.’
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board found greater auditing deficiencies in its inspections of accounting firms last year as the firms faced staff turnover and generally used less experienced workers.
Inspectors expect that roughly 40% of the audits they reviewed in 2022 will have had at least one deficiency, meaning the audit firm failed to obtain sufficient evidence to back up its opinion, according to a report released Monday by the U.S. auditing watchdog.
That is up from 34% in 2021 and 29% in 2020. The PCAOB said it expects to finish firm-inspection reports later this year.
The PCAOB not only inspects audit firms and sets audit standards but also disciplines the firms for violations, not necessarily related to inspections.
The regulator, which is overseen by the Securities and Exchange Commission, said it inspected 157 audit firms and reviewed portions of 710 audits in 2022, up from 141 firms and 690 audits a year earlier.
Several firms attributed lower audit quality to higher levels of staff turnover, reliance on less experienced staff and adoption of remote work, which accelerated due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the PCAOB said, adding that it doesn’t analyze the root causes of audit deficiencies.
Audit firms have been grappling with a deepening shortage of auditors and accountants as more professionals retire without a robust pipeline of replacements.
The firms should have a strategy to address recurring challenges, some that arose after the start of the pandemic, Chair Erica Williams said.
“That war for talent is something that has been around and is no longer a new phenomenon and so firms again really do have to meet this responsibility and turn this troubling trend around,” she said. Williams called the 40% deficiency rate “completely unacceptable.”
The PCAOB under Williams has been stepping up its enforcement efforts, in contrast with the previous leadership, which faced accusations of being too cozy with the audit profession.
It imposed $10.5 million in total fines against accounting firms and individual auditors in 2022, up from an average of $2.1 million over the previous five years, according to a February report from Cornerstone Research, a financial consulting firm.
The penalty total reached the highest level since the PCAOB’s formation in 2003.
“Where we find wrongdoing, we will not hesitate to pursue it where appropriate,” Williams said. “Ultimately though, the responsibility to correct [audit deficiencies] falls on the audit firms.”
In May, the PCAOB said it found significant auditing deficiencies in its first-ever set of inspections in China and Hong Kong. It issued inspection reports showing that KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers had deficiency rates of 100% and 75%, respectively, in those two areas, based on a review of eight audits across the two firms.
Updated: 7-27-2023
SEC Chief Accountant Warns Accountants About Liabilities When Auditing Crypto Firms
Paul Munter says making or allowing misleading statements can have serious consequences for accounting firms and individual accountants.
Paul Munter, chief accountant of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), has released a statement warning accounting firms of their obligations to the agency when working with crypto firms.
Allowing their finding to be misrepresented could have serious consequences, he said.
Crypto firms may engage accountants to “perform some sort of review of certain parts of their business, often presented as a purported ‘audit’” and falsely present the work as being comparable to a financial statement audit, Munter wrote. Doing so is not only misleading, but it can have legal liability.
Accounting firms have a legal obligation under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to look for illegal activities and report them to the SEC, Munter continued.
“Material misstatement” by accountants or their clients could violate both the Securities Exchange Act and the Securities Act of 1933, resulting in censure or suspension of the firm. Those provisions can also be applied to individuals.
Munter advised accounting firms to consider these issues during client onboarding and to consider contractual prohibitions on certain language. In response to misleading statements, the position of the SEC Office of the Chief Accountant is:
“As best practice, the accounting firm should consider making a noisy withdrawal, disassociating itself from the client, including by way of its own public statements, or, if that is not sufficient, informing the Commission.”
The accounting firm’s independence is vital, Munter continued, and even the appearance of a mutual interest or conflict of interest in its public statements could be enough to have the firm suspended from “the privilege of appearing or practicing before the Commission.”
Want to hear perspectives from the SEC Office of the Chief Accountant? Listen to our latest podcast with guest speaker SEC Chief Accountant Paul Munter for insights on accounting and audit hot topics. #KPMGFRV #SEC #audit https://t.co/a2MsEjOvbR
— Joe Bailitz (@JoeBailitz) July 25, 2023
The SEC does not have the resources to scrutinize every financial statement, and it “relies heavily on accountants to assure corporate compliance with federal securities law requirements,” Munter wrote.
In 2022, his office issued the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin 121, which also concerned third-party disclosures and was widely criticized as regulation by enforcement.
Updated: 7-28-2023
How A Common Accounting Rule Leads To More Layoffs And Less Job Training
Because employees don’t have value in accounting terms, they can’t be considered assets. They can only be costs.
Financial accounting isn’t always the easiest topic to get fired up about. But that’s a mistake, especially these days.
Accounting rules increasingly are driving companies to make bad decisions about how they hire, fire and develop their workforce. And it is time to rethink those rules.
The problem stems from the assumption in financial accounting that only things that can be owned have value—like machines and real estate. Obviously, you can’t own employees—so, under this logic, they can’t have value.
That is true even if all the value in a company lies in the abilities of its key employees, and those employees are locked in with contracts, noncompete agreements, long-term incentives and so forth.
As somebody who has studied the workplace for four decades, I have seen this assumption wreak havoc on companies and employees alike.
That’s because if employees don’t have value in accounting terms, it means they can’t be assets—in other words, things that have value for the company.
They can only be costs that a company must pay.
If that is the case, laying off employees saves money; companies are just getting rid of costs, after all, not anything of real value. To carry the logic even further:
Because it is only possible to invest in assets, and employees aren’t assets, the money spent to train and develop them can’t be an investment. Those are current and administrative expenses lumped in with coffee and office supplies.
This flawed picture of workers is set down in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles created by the Financial Accounting Standards Board.
The rules, no doubt, made much more sense when they were formulated more than half a century ago, when manufacturing was a much bigger part of the economy, and holdings like factories played a much bigger role in a company’s financials.
But now human capital looms much larger for many businesses. Think of how much of the tech industry is built on the skills of its employees—programmers and other professionals—rather than its physical holdings.
Accounting rules don’t recognize that value. Employees are still costs, not assets, and that leads to a number of disastrous problems.
(When asked about the rules, and the damage they may potentially do, the FASB and SEC declined to comment.)
The Human Factor
The most visible problem the current standards cause is layoffs. If employees were treated as assets, layoffs would be the last—rather than one of the first—things to think about in difficult times.
Dumping assets would seem crazy, especially knowing that companies might soon have to replace them. But, as we’ve seen, dumping employees in practice just means dumping costs.
Consider the layoffs going on now in businesses that only months ago struggled to hire people and likely will need to hire again soon.
This view leads companies to skimp on employee development, as well. Consider a choice between buying a piece of equipment to perform a task—such as robots or AI—or retraining an employee to do it.
If a company buys the equipment, it counts as an asset that offsets liabilities. Companies can amortize it and pay it off over time as the value from it comes in.
If companies retrain an employee, though, there is no asset value. If a company can’t cover the training cost in that year, then the training appears to be a losing proposition. So, companies systematically underinvest in training versus other spending.
They do this even though employees obviously become more valuable with time—unlike software or equipment—as they gain skill and experience.
From there, it is a short step to other problems, such as skimping on accrued benefits that are earned over time, such as vacation and sick leave or pensions. Accrued benefits are perfectly sensible for encouraging employee commitment and retention.
But they are terrible for financial accounting because they are treated as liabilities that must be offset by an equivalent amount of assets.
Avoiding Permanence
All of that hurts employees who are already part of a company, not to mention the companies themselves. But the current rules also distort how companies hire people in the first place.
Financial accounting requires that companies report their total number of employees, and important measures of performance are calculated on a per employee basis, such as profit per employee.
So, companies finesse the employee problem by using leased employees, who may work in the company’s offices but are employed by a third-party vendor. More important, these employees aren’t counted as liabilities for accounting purposes.
Beyond that, the investor community doesn’t view these workers as fixed costs—the worst kind of costs, because it is believed they can’t be cut if the business goes down. Regular employees’ salaries, on the other hand, are seen as fixed costs.
By some measures, leased employees now constitute 11% of the workforce. In many tech companies, nonemployees are over half the labor being used.
There are countless downsides to this arrangement. Leased employees have few obligations to their client. Their contracts aren’t especially flexible. And they are typically more expensive per hour than regular employees, especially when considering the vendor fees.
A related and arguably more common practice than leasing is simply to leave jobs vacant under the guise of saving money. This practice cuts employment costs—but doesn’t measure the lost value of work not getting done.
What’s Next?
Investors have known about the distortions involved in financial-accounting rules for a long time. But they have become much more vocal about changing the rules in recent years, to get more transparency about what companies are really spending.
In 2021, the SEC required companies to report whatever they thought would be material human-capital issues—but companies can choose to report whatever they want, or nothing.
So far, businesses largely don’t disclose much of anything voluntarily because they know that they then will have to keep reporting it, even when the news is bad. Otherwise, investors will assume that the news must be really bad, or they would be reporting it.
There are now proposals before the SEC that would require companies to report simple human-capital measures, such as total spending on labor, not just employees, and spending on training.
In theory, companies would no longer have strong incentives to use leased employees, drop accrued benefits and skimp on worker development. Those costs would no longer look like spending on coffee.
It is rare to think of policies that are better for investors, employees and economic efficiency all at once, but improving the transparency around human capital is one of those.
Updated: 7-29-2023
Hester Pierce Strikes Back Against Sec Crypto Warning To Accounting Firms
Hester Pierce, a United States Securities and Exchange Commission commissioner, argued that full transparency should not come at the cost of compromising good-faith efforts.
Commissioner Hester Pierce of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has raised concerns about the agency’s recent statement advising accounting firms against taking on non-audit work for crypto firms.
In a July 28 tweet, Pierce challenged the recent statement by the SEC’s chief accountant Paul Munter, proposing that accounting firms adopt an all-or-nothing approach in their dealings with crypto firms.
Pierce believes this might cause crypto firms to shy away from making good-faith efforts to be transparent.
Crypto platforms & their accountants should be clear about what proof of reserves is and isn’t & customers should understand the limitations, but why would we want to discourage good-faith efforts to provide more transparency? https://t.co/fsuxUGPrrb
— Hester Peirce (@HesterPeirce) July 27, 2023
While Pierce noted that crypto firms and accountants should ensure transparency regarding proof of reserves, specifying what is and isn’t acceptable, she questioned why accounting firms should be cautious of providing assurance work to crypto firms.
“Why would we want to discourage good-faith efforts to provide more transparency?” Pierce asked in a tweet.
Munter argued that partial engagements might result in crypto firms selectively choosing only certain aspects of the business to show accounting firms and then presenting that information as a full audit to clients.
He believes that work beyond a full audit’s scope will lack transparency for investors, stating:
“Certain crypto asset trading platforms, with others in the crypto industry, have marketed to investors their retention of third parties, sometimes accounting firms, to perform some sort of review of certain parts of their business, often presented as a purported “audit.“
According to Munter, if an accounting firm discovers that a client is making misleading statements about its non-audit work to the public, it should consider making a “noisy withdrawal, disassociating itself from the client” by making a public statement or reporting the crypto firm to the SEC.
Mike Shaub, an auditing and accounting ethics professor at Texas A&M University, responded to the statement in a July 29 tweet, mentioning that auditors are obligated by confidentiality, making it challenging to make public statements like Munter suggested.
The recent trend has been to take credit as being cutting edge (e.g., specializing in SPACs or crypto or whatever) to raise the profile, then to be low profile when things go south. That may have triggered SEC interest as well. If the auditor is silent in these cases, beware. 2/2
— Mike Shaub (@mikeshaub) July 28, 2023
Shaub also highlighted the issue of some accounting firms aligning themselves with cryptocurrency expertise to boost their reputation but becoming unresponsive when problems arise.
Updated: 8-17-2023
U.S. Auditing Watchdog Tries To Remake Itself, But It Isn’t Easy
Chair Erica Williams has tried to set the troubled PCAOB on a new course. The ambitious shift has been marked by policy divisions and onerous work demands, but also a bounce in morale.
When Erica Williams took over the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, she had her work cut out for her: mend a fractured culture, put some teeth into enforcement and bring outdated auditing rules into the present.
In January 2022, when she became chair of the PCAOB, the audit regulator had recently suffered a major blow. The Securities and Exchange Commission, overseer of the PCAOB, had dismissed former Chair William Duhnke the previous year and replaced most of the five-member board amid what was described as a culture of fear under Duhnke.
Appointed by SEC Chair Gary Gensler, Williams soon signaled a tougher enforcement approach to send a message to the audit profession, vowing to conduct more sweeps to root out wrongdoing by audit firms, strengthen and update standards and make inspections more efficient and transparent.
“This board is approaching enforcement with a renewed vigilance,” she said at a conference in September. “We intend to use every tool in our enforcement toolbox and impose significant sanctions, where appropriate, to ensure there are consequences for putting investors at risk and that bad actors are removed.”
Last year, the regulator fined accounting firms and individual auditors a total $10.5 million, a fivefold leap from an average of $1.9 million in each of the previous five years, according to Cornerstone Research, a financial consulting firm.
The 2022 penalty total was the highest since 2003, when the PCAOB was created as part of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act after the Enron accounting scandal.
But that ambitious agenda is also straining staff and bringing to the surface previously rare board dissent.
Williams’ goals place significant expectations on employees to carry the new policies out, with requests, for example, to generate a big number of enforcement cases, people familiar with the matter said.
Enforcement staff feel pressure to get significantly larger fines from accounting firms and auditors than in the past, the people said. Williams has said the PCAOB wants to increase the quality and types of cases it is pursuing, along with higher penalties.
The PCAOB brought 42 enforcement cases in 2022, up from 22 on average from 2018 to 2020 under Duhnke, but down from a 51 average the prior three years, during which James Doty served as chair, the PCAOB said.
“The PCAOB is mending. Under the prior board, I think there was a big morale problem, but I think that morale problem is easing.”
— J. Robert Brown, former PCAOB board member
The increased regulatory activity generally has been in line with that of the SEC under Gensler, who spearheaded the PCAOB overhaul. And Gensler, who has been SEC chair since April 2021, has faced similar criticism of work demands.
In a report last October, the SEC’s internal watchdog said the Gensler-led agency’s more aggressive agenda had stretched staff resources and increased risk of litigation. The SEC declined to comment for this article.
Morale, however, is generally higher at the roughly 900-person watchdog under Williams, according to current and former employees.
“The PCAOB is mending,” said J. Robert Brown, who served as a board member from 2018 to 2021. “Under the prior board, I think there was a big morale problem, but I think that morale problem is easing.”
In a statement, Williams commented, “Protecting investors on U.S. markets drives everything we do at the PCAOB,” adding, “The Board and I will continue working together alongside the dedicated staff to improve audit quality for investors while making the PCAOB an even better place to work.”
Policy Divisions
The PCAOB, which regulates the accounting firms that audit U.S.-listed companies, sets audit standards, inspects audits and disciplines firms for violations.
Currently, it has nine active proposals for new and updated standards, at least two of which it plans to adopt this year, and four additional rules it plans to propose by year-end, including a standard on auditors’ assessment of a company’s ability to continue operating.
And that ramped-up rule-making has laid bare some policy fissures. The board had a rare split vote on policy, when Duane DesParte and Christina Ho—the only two board members who are certified public accountants—in June opposed a PCAOB proposal requiring auditors to take a more proactive role in flagging possible fraud at their clients.
DesParte, the board’s sole holdover from the Duhnke era, at the time expressed dismay at the PCAOB’s broadening agenda.
“As we proceed one by one, I am increasingly concerned that we are establishing new auditor obligations and incrementally imposing new auditor responsibilities in ways that will significantly expand the scope and cost of audit and fundamentally alter the role of auditors,” he said.
The divided vote underscored a longstanding divergence between the PCAOB’s audit professionals and staff more focused on investors, typically over how much to require from auditors.
The Center for Audit Quality, an industry group, also criticized the proposal, echoing some of DesParte’s concerns. The Council of Institutional Investors, however, said the proposal benefits investors, but also suggested it could go further in expanding auditors’ responsibilities.
“For two decades, the PCAOB failed miserably to update and revise all the standards it inherited, but they still have a long way to go.”
— Lynn Turner, PCAOB advisory group
The PCAOB is in the process of updating nearly 40 audit rules related to 13 of its standard-setting projects, many of which refer to outdated technology.
Since its inception, the group has used much of the rulebook of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants on what was supposed to be an interim basis.
Many investors, however, say the PCAOB has never gone far enough to strengthen standards and enforcement, and it has yet to adopt any standards proposed under Williams.
“For two decades, the PCAOB failed miserably to update and revise all the standards it inherited, but they still have a long way to go,” said Lynn Turner, a member of the PCAOB’s investor advisory group and former SEC chief accountant.
In a statement, Williams said she is “proud of the accomplishments the Board is achieving” working together on behalf of investors.
Culture Reset
Williams has also made some efforts to improve working conditions following a turbulent stretch at the watchdog. In 2017, the SEC replaced the board after a scandal involving the leak of confidential inspections data.
In 2019, a whistleblower alleged that Duhnke, who became chair in 2018, was pushing out career personnel, in some cases in retaliation for disparaging the organization, and engaged in a politicized attempt to run down the PCAOB.
A January 2021 report by former SEC Chairman Harvey Pitt said there was an “environment of fear and distrust” among the staff under Duhnke that led to the allegations.
Speaking of the 2017 aftermath, Duhnke said: “In the wake of the cheating scandal, the PCAOB needed a comprehensive reset … As one might expect, some were unhappy with the changes. Instead of rising to the challenge, they resorted to filing numerous false anonymous complaints.”
Under Williams, the PCAOB takes regular employee surveys, has extended paid parental leave to 16 weeks from four, and holds group discussions to improve the culture.
In an internal survey, 84% of staff said they would recommend the PCAOB “as a great place to work,” well up from 55% a year earlier. The PCAOB declined to provide the full results of the survey, which was conducted between March and May.
In recent weeks, the PCAOB has had a series of high-level departures, among them Ken Lench, general counsel; Eric Hagopian, information and data chief, and Raymond Hamm, the deputy director of enforcement and investigations.
Williams has elevated veteran staffers Karen Dietrich and Barbara Vanich to director of the office of international affairs and chief auditor, respectively, while also appointing outsiders to key roles including enforcement and investigations director and the organization’s first chief operating officer.
Still, observers see Williams’ ambitions as a tough climb.
“Chair Williams probably has some really good intentions to change the culture, but culture is very hard to change and will likely take years to achieve,” said Kim Westermann, an associate professor of accounting at California Polytechnic State University who has conducted research on PCAOB inspections.
Updated: 8-23-2024
EY Sheds U.S. Audit Clients In Response To Shortfalls
The accounting firm, which has led market share in U.S. public-company auditing for the past decade, had 84 companies depart since the start of 2023, at least 50 more than at each of its Big Four peers
Ernst & Young said it is cutting ties with many U.S. public companies as audit clients, a move to revamp its audit practice and improve the quality of its work.
Eighty-four public companies exited EY as audit clients between Jan. 1, 2023, and Aug. 15 of this year, according to data from research firm Ideagen Audit Analytics. The firm also added 21 clients in that time.
That is at least 50 departures more than at the other three large accounting firms—Deloitte, KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers—during the same period. In contrast with EY’s net loss of 63 clients, Deloitte, KPMG and PwC had net arrivals of 46, 13 and four, respectively, in that period.
Some of those clients include drugmaker Catalent, hydrogen truck maker Nikola, real-estate investment trust SL Green Realty, transportation software developer Verra Mobility, farm equipment manufacturer CNH Industrial, and business-software provider Bill Holdings.
The reduced roster and loss of roughly $215 million in fees could threaten EY’s status as the largest auditor of U.S. public companies by market share, but that isn’t something the firm is worried about yet.
The reduction is largely by design and is intended to “accelerate our transformation efforts,” said Dante D’Egidio, the firm’s Americas vice chair for assurance. A regulator found that EY’s rate of audit shortfalls, or deficiencies, had soared, leading the firm to simplify and improve its approach, the firm has said.
For the past couple of years, EY has navigated several challenges. The U.S. unit laid off partners across its business lines amid slowing demand for certain consulting services, and played a key role in the blowup of plans to globally split the auditing and consulting sides of the business into two different companies.
Following the scuttled split, the firm has sought to unify its workforce under a new global chair, Janet Truncale, who started in the role in July and ruled out reviving plans for a split.
EY began the revamp, including resigning from serving certain public-company audit clients and limiting new clients, roughly 18 months ago, people familiar with the matter said.
The move came after the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board found the rate of EY’s auditing deficiencies, based on a sampling of audits of 2021 financial statements, surged to 46% from 21% in the previous year. It was the highest deficiency rate among the Big Four in the U.S.
The findings led EY to revamp its U.S. audit practice, focusing on standardizing its approach and building centralized teams to provide audit support on various topics.
The firm last November said it was also enhancing portions of its audit methodology and tools and refreshing its approach to improve training.
In June, EY said it planned to invest $1 billion over three years in part to strengthen artificial intelligence-enabled audit and tax platforms and lift U.S. early-career compensation. The firm hadn’t previously said the overhaul involved these client reductions.
But EY’s audit issues haven’t stopped yet. Companies such as networking solutions provider Infinera and supply-chain technology provider Trimble in recent months said their auditor, EY, identified issues in managing financial risks during the PCAOB inspection of the audit work rather than during the audit itself, according to SEC filings. Neither Infinera nor Trimble has said it is changing auditors. The companies didn’t respond to a request for comment.
“Those companies wanted to be transparent with investors and explain why they reported issues outside of the standard reporting cycle so they voluntarily provided disclosure,” said Olga Usvyatsky, an accounting researcher.
Last week, the PCAOB issued the latest inspection reports for audits of financials. Again, EY had the highest deficiency rate of 37% among the Big Four, though it was lower than the previous year.
“Our ongoing transformation efforts are continuing to drive improvements, and we are confident that future inspections will further recognize that progress,” D’Egidio said, adding that last week’s report “shows that we’re moving in the right direction.”
In 2023, EY provided 932 audit opinions, comprising 13.5% of all views, followed by Deloitte at 866, or 12.5%, Ideagen said. EY’s market share was generally flat over the past decade, while Deloitte’s increased 2.7 percentage points since 2014.
“Market share is important but not as important as transforming our audit practice and driving higher quality audits,” D’Egidio said.
The Big Four firms collectively issue about 45% of all public company audit opinions in the U.S., the data showed.
Typically, public companies switch auditors either to pay lower fees or because they have gone private, been acquired or outgrown the capabilities of the original firm. Audit firms also can drop clients, potentially if they have become overly risky or serving them presents a conflict of interest.
Companies must disclose if they dismissed their auditor or their auditor resigned, though they don’t have to provide additional detail that in some cases would further clarify the circumstances.
“If something goes wrong with a company’s financial statements or management, the auditor’s reputation may be affected because the public can associate the auditor with whatever the management does,” said Charles Cullinan, an accounting professor at Bryant University.
Since January 2023, EY is the only Big Four firm to have lost more in audit fees than it gained from client turnover. Its client departures in that time represented roughly $215 million in audit fees, based on the most recent year, compared with $31 million in audit fees from the clients it gained.
EY’s lost audit fees are at least $130 million greater than at each of its Big Four peers. Deloitte’s lost fees totaled $70.5 million, while lost fees were $61.4 million at KPMG and $80.5 million at PwC, data showed.
Catalent, which in February named Grant Thornton as its new auditor, paid the highest audit fees among EY’s recently departed clients, at nearly $13 million for the latest year.
KPMG, whose rate of auditing shortfalls dropped to 26% from 30% in the latest inspections, said it hasn’t needed to reduce its U.S. client portfolio to increase audit quality. “New technology capabilities help us seamlessly audit new companies, allowing us to grow our portfolio with quality,” KPMG spokesman Russ Grote said.
Deloitte has been the biggest beneficiary of the EY moves, having gained 22 EY clients in that time, according to Ideagen data. EY also gained two big-ticket clients, energy-drink maker Monster Beverage and server manufacturer Super Micro Computer, from Deloitte, which is a sponsor of CFO Journal.
Updated: 8-27-2024
Hindenburg Research Alleges Super Micro Is Riddled With Accounting, Sanctions Scandals
Hindenburg Research has uncovered evidence of big problems with a major AI hardware provider.
Investment research firm Hindenburg Research has released a report alleging that server component supplier Super Micro Computer is a “serial recidivist” with a host of accounting and sanctions issues and other irregularities.
Hindenburg Research spent three months investigating the $35-billion company. It compiled exhaustive evidence from public records and interviews with former Super Micro employees and sources at its trading partners.
The investigation noted that those developments took place as Super Micro was losing market share and experiencing customer service issues.
Super Micro Keeps It All In The Family?
The red flags uncovered by Hindenburg Research are reminiscent of those that led to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission issuing a cease-and-desist order against Super Micro and its chief financial officer, Howard Hideshima, in 2020, it said.
The SEC action followed the rehiring of executives who left after Super Micro’s delisting from the Nasdaq exchange in 2018 for failing to file financial statements.
Hindenburg Research noted, “Normally, when companies are caught in major accounting scandals, they will fire and permanently distance themselves from the culpable individuals to show that they take corporate governance seriously.”
However, three key Super Micro executives — one vice president and two senior vice presidents — who resigned in 2018 are back in leadership positions. Hideshima was hired as a consultant by Super Micro’s business partner Ablecom Technology, a company run by Super Micro CEO Charles Liang’s brother.
Among other alleged related-party dealings, Super Micro did $1 billion in business with Ablecom and Compuware in the last three years. Compuware is run by another brother of CEO Liang. According to Hindenburg Research:
“Super Micro provides components to Ablecom and Compuware, who simply assemble them and sell them back to Super Micro. […] Both entities appear to work almost exclusively with Super Micro.”
Super Micro Returned To Old Habits?
Super Micro pleaded guilty to violating sanctions against Iran in 2006. Hindenburg Research found evidence that the company is violating sanctions on supplying high tech to Russia through transshipment:
“At least 46 companies that handled Super Micro products to Russia are now under OFAC sanctions or on U.S. Government watchlists.”
Many of the accounting irregularities found by Hindenburg Research were first alleged in a suit filed in April by Super Micro’s former head of global services. Those charges include misallocating revenue to boost profit margins and prematurely booking revenue from undelivered or faulty equipment.
Super Micro did not immediately respond to Cointelegraph’s request for comment on the report.
ment on rumors and speculation.”
Super Micro Falls As Hindenburg Takes Aim With Short Report
* Accusations Focus On Accounting Practices, Transactions
* The Maker Of Servers Has Been A Winner Of The AI Trade
Super Micro Computer Inc. shares fell on Tuesday after Hindenburg Research said it’s short the maker of server equipment, which became a tech-market darling as a major beneficiary of the boom in artificial intelligence.
The stock fell as much as 8.7% after Hindenburg Research’s report, though it pared much of that decline and closed down 2.6%.
Hindenburg, the firm run by Nate Anderson, wrote that an investigation into the company revealed “glaring accounting red flags, evidence of undisclosed related party transactions, sanctions and export control failures, and customer issues.” Super Micro’s convertible debt also dropped on the news.
A spokesperson for Super Micro said the company “does not comment on rumors and speculation.”
Woo Jin Ho, an analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, wrote
that Hindenburg’s report “could raise greater scrutiny on the server-equipment maker’s accounting practices and customer transactions,” and that while Hindenburg’s concerns aren’t new, they “might intensify the spotlight on client relationships, especially given heightened US scrutiny of AI-systems sales to sanctioned companies and countries.”
In 2020, Super Micro Resolved An Investigation
by the US Securities and Exchange Commission into its accounting and disclosures for its fiscal years 2014-2017 by correcting its financial statements and paying a penalty, while promising not to commit such violations in future.
Super Micro sells high-powered servers for data centers and has seen an explosion of demand over recent quarters amid the growth in AI, making its shares a proxy for enthusiasm in the nascent technology.
While the company’s shares have receded more than 50% from a peak of $1,229 in March, they remain up more than 90% for the year.
The company’s stock has risen at least 30% every year starting in 2019, culminating in 2023’s jump of almost 250%. That surge lifted the company’s market capitalization above $32 billion. Earlier this year, the company grew to be
the largest single stock weighting the Russell 2000 Index has seen going back to 1999, according to Bloomberg Intelligence, and it was added to the S&P 500 Index in March.
Super Micro’s revenue more than doubled to $14.9 billion in the fiscal year that ended in June, and management said revenue in the current fiscal year will be about $28 billion.
Still, there are concerns about the profitability of AI-optimized servers sold by companies like Super Micro, Dell Technologies Inc., and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. Because these servers require expensive chips made by companies like Nvidia Corp., they are generally lower-margin than other products.
Hindenburg Research has also recently targeted Axos Financial Inc., citing its exposure to problematic commercial real estate loans, and Icahn Enterprises LP, a report that led to Carl Icahn and his investment firm agreeing to pay $2 million to settle a probe by the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
Earlier this month, Hindenburg accused the head of India’s market regulator of having conflicts of interest that prevented a thorough examination of manipulation and fraud claims at the Adani Group.
Super Micro Slides On 10-K Delay Following Hindenburg Report
* Delay Follows Hindenburg Short Alleging ‘Accounting Red Flags’
* Shares Of The Server Maker Tumbled After Trading Opened
Super Micro Computer Inc. said it will delay filing its annual financial disclosures, setting off the stock’s largest intraday decline in almost six years.
The San Jose, California-based server maker requires additional time “to complete its assessment of the design and operating effectiveness of its internal controls over financial reporting,” the company said in a filing Wednesday morning.
Super Micro said it “has not made updates to its results” for the previously reported fiscal year and quarter.
This filing delay comes a day after short-seller Hindenburg Research released a critical report alleging “glaring accounting red flags, evidence of undisclosed related party transactions, sanctions and export control failures, and customer issues.”
Super Micro shares fell as much as 26%, the stock’s biggest intraday drop since October 9, 2018.
The company sells high-powered servers for data centers and has experienced an explosion in demand for its wares amid the artificial intelligence boom, making its shares a proxy for enthusiasm in the nascent technology.
Super Micro’s stock more than tripled last year and was up 92.6% this year through Tuesday’s close.
In 2020, Super Micro resolved an investigation by the US Securities and Exchange Commission into its accounting and disclosures for its fiscal years 2014-2017 by correcting its financial statements and paying a penalty, while promising not to commit such violations in future.
After the newly announced delay, “it appears there are lingering governance issues,” wrote Woo Jin Ho, an analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence.
Accounting Isn’t Cool Anymore
Accountants
Well I Think Accounting Is Cool. Accounting, Like Tax Law Or Ancient Greek, Has This Pleasing Constellation Of Features:
* It is an arcane and detailed body of knowledge, so if you have a detail-oriented, trivia-loving cast of mind, you might enjoy it, and if you become good at it people will be impressed at all the random stuff you know.
* But it’s not random. Despite the arcana, it is a fundamentally principled body of knowledge: The rules fit together in a largely sensible way to achieve some core goals. In accounting, the basic goals include accurately and usefully presenting a company’s financial position, accurately reflecting changes in that position, etc.
* It is a social body of knowledge: Accounting rules are made by committees based on human experiences; they are not given facts of the natural world. Understanding people helps you understand accounting, and vice versa.
* If you understand the principles deeply and study all the arcana, you can find little glitches, little places where the actual rules can be used to accomplish things that seem to contradict the deep principles. In tax law, the glitches tend to have the form “make income disappear.” In accounting, the glitches tend to have the form “make income appear out of nowhere.” Finding those glitches is a satisfying intellectual endeavor and a way to demonstrate to yourself that you have truly mastered both the principles and the details.
* Also, if you are good at finding those glitches, you can turn them into a lot of money. (This does not work with Ancient Greek.)
Does that sound appealing to you? Probably most of you are saying “what, no,” and a substantial minority of you are like “yes, that does sound cool, that is pretty much what I do in my job as a [derivatives structurer][distressed credit investor][software engineer][fintech founder][financial fraudster], though I probably get paid more than the accountants,” and a few of you are like “I am an accountant and that doesn’t sound all that much like my day job,” and then one of you is going to email me to be like “I am an accountant at a Big Four national office and thank you for appreciating my art.”
But A Lot Of 18-Year-Olds Will Start College Soon And They All Think Accounting Is Boring, So There Is A Dire Shortage Of Accountants. At Business Insider, Emmalyse Brownstein Reports:
* Accountants have become an endangered species, and that’s endangering the financial ecosystem. But bolstering their ranks is no easy feat.
* “The pay is crappy, the hours are long, and the work is drudgery,” said Richard Rampell, a retired accountant in South Florida. “And the drudgery is especially so in their early years.” …
* Gen Z is also, notably, the first generation to have truly grown up with social media. They spent their childhoods watching a stream of what everyone else does with their lives, and many have become convinced that that’s much better than whatever they’re doing with their own.
In this way, social media has incentivized them to focus on doing things their peers deem interesting or exciting. And, well, accounting isn’t readily Instagrammable.
* Then there’s the double-whammy problem of becoming an accountant, which is both harder to achieve and pays less than other finance jobs. A CPA candidate usually needs to get a master’s in accounting to satisfy the requirement that they take 150 credit hours.
After that comes the CPA exam: four grueling four-hour tests that must be passed within 18 months. And before they can officially get the title, candidates need to spend a year working under a licensed CPA. …
* Students can get higher-paying and arguably more exciting finance jobs right out of college without doing all that.
I mean, fair; I enjoyed dabbling in accounting as a derivatives structurer but I didn’t go and become a CPA or anything. There are some obvious fixes, including “pay them more,” “easing the 150-credit-hours requirement” and making accounting classes cooler:
* The way accounting is taught could also help stanch the shortage, [New York University accounting professor Amal] Shehata said. “It’s up to us as academics to make the curriculum exciting and interesting,” she said.
“To me, that means it’s relevant and it’s timely.” For example, she recently taught a class about the intersection of the blockchain and accounting.
The Kids These Days, They Love Blockchains. And:
* The report’s suggestions included “placing highly engaging instructors” in those classes, “incorporating gamification and other technology” to “stoke engagement and demonstrate the vital role technology plays in the accounting profession,” and exposing students to “more real-life accounting practitioners in a range of career vocations.”
I kind of love the idea of gamifying introductory accounting education? It is probably not the case that every accountant should be trained to think of accounting as a game that they can win, but the ones who are trained that way can probably have a lot of fun.
Updated: 4-2-2025
Consulting Giants Offer Billions In Cuts To Federal Contracts. It Might Not Be Enough.
Accenture, Deloitte, IBM and other firms proposed price concessions this week but are expected to be asked to dig deeper.
The 10 biggest U.S. consulting firms to the federal government have offered to cut billions of dollars from their contracts with agencies but face pushback from the Trump administration to deliver even deeper savings.
Companies including Accenture, Booz Allen Hamilton and others met the General Services Administration deadline this week to justify their contracts and identify potential cost cuts to existing projects.
Trump administration officials are expected to go back to some of the firms, demanding further price concessions or other revisions, according to people familiar with the review process.
Some companies missed the mark by submitting too little in savings or by sending voluminous pages of PowerPoint slides explaining their work, the people said, while other firms identified detailed potential cuts.
At least one company outlined $12 billion in potential savings to the government, according to a person familiar with the matter.
The chief executive officer of Booz Allen, which generates nearly all of its $11 billion in annual revenue from contracts tied to the U.S. government, said his firm had proposed more than $1 billion in savings related to its own projects.
The firm identified Booz contracts that agencies could review or potentially cancel and proposed dozens of other ideas to streamline the way the government functions.
Booz also suggested the government shift more contracts to performance-based pricing arrangements and earmarked some projects that could be done by the government itself, said Horacio Rozanski, Booz Allen’s CEO.
“There is some work that in the spirit of efficiency, the government could choose to in-source,” Rozanski said in an interview. Other firms have proposed similar types of efficiencies.
Leidos, another large contractor, provided the GSA with a “detailed set of options for meeting the administration’s goal of making the U.S. government more efficient and cost-effective,” a spokesman for the firm said. He declined to give a cost estimate of any of its proposals.
Accenture and IBM didn’t comment. Deloitte didn’t respond to a request for comment.
In its push to slash spending across the federal government, the Trump administration initiated a review of government contracts earlier this year, asking the 10 biggest consulting firms to the government to “defend the spend.” It said those firms alone are set to receive more than $65 billion in fees in 2025 and future years.
The push has weighed on the firms’ stocks and prompted a flurry of meetings with Trump officials. Many executives have sought time with Josh Gruenbaum, a former director at private-equity firm KKR who was picked by President Trump as the GSA’s procurement chief and is now leading the broad review of consulting spending.
Since Trump’s election in November, Booz Allen and Accenture shares have declined about 40% and 12% respectively, while shares of Leidos have dropped 30%. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 index has fallen 5% since then.
The proposals will now be reviewed by the federal agencies overseeing the contracts, and the GSA has told the consulting firms their responses will be compared against their rivals’.
“I have no doubt that you’ll see some progress made because the companies are going to respond to what the government tells them to do,” said Stan Soloway, the former head of the largest trade association of government-service contractors, who is now CEO of consulting firm Celero Strategies.
Soloway said federal agencies could also make a push to preserve contracts the GSA looks to cut if they see the work as necessary to their missions.
Plenty of firms are already feeling the results of the administration’s focus on costs. Accenture CEO Julie Sweet said last week that as the government works to streamline spending “many new procurement actions have slowed, which is negatively impacting our sales and revenue.”
Updated: 4-3-2025
How To Navigate Trump’s Cuts If You’re Making All Your Money From The Government
Booz Allen’s CEO discusses the more than $1 billion in savings his firm has offered up and what its business will look like post-DOGE.
WASHINGTON—When the Trump administration recently ordered big consulting firms to offer price concessions on the billions of dollars in projects they do for the federal government, Booz Allen Hamilton CEO Horacio Rozanski sprang into action.
For Booz, which makes 98% of its roughly $11 billion in annual revenue from government-related work, the assignment was existential. Rozanski and his team pulled in more than 100 employees to develop a response, which included more than $1 billion in potential cost savings.
Rozanski, 57 years old, is a more than three-decade Booz veteran who has experienced budget showdowns and new administrations before. But the second Trump term is different.
“Especially with the government, slow means never, and fast means now,” Rozanski said. “It’s been a jolt to the system. It’s been a jolt to the industry.”
The jolts are likely to continue. Booz’s stock is down about 35% since the inauguration, and the Trump administration is expected to demand deeper cuts from the firms.
In an interview in the capital this week, Rozanski discussed Booz’s response, whether staff cuts will follow—and why the company is so concentrated in government work. Here are excerpts, condensed and edited:
The Wall Street Journal: The General Services Administration asked companies to explain their work in a way a 15-year-old could understand. What’s your answer?
Rozanski: We’re an advanced technology company. Our work in the federal government spans some of the most critical missions. We’re talking about space, the intelligence community and some of the health agencies like the Veterans Affairs administration. Our work, for the most part, is about bringing technology into those missions to make them faster, better and more efficient.
WSJ: The GSA asked firms like yours to say which projects could potentially be canceled. What did you propose?
Rozanski: There is some work that, in the spirit of efficiency, the government could choose to in-source or maybe not do because it’s not a priority. And we identified contracts where, because we’ve become more efficient, the same work could be done at a lower cost.
WSJ: Does that mean Booz Allen could lose more than $1 billion in revenue?
Rozanski: GSA would need to talk to the partner agencies that actually own the work. But, presumably, an outcome would be that a lot of these dollars don’t come to Booz Allen.
WSJ: What are examples of contracts you feel are no longer needed or the government could do itself?
Rozanski: We don’t have a lot of work that is studies and things like that, but there is some.
There’s work where we’re supporting, say, a research effort the government may not need us to do, or may not want to continue. There’s work that maybe was commissioned three or four years ago that no longer makes sense.
WSJ: Will the price concessions mean layoffs?
Rozanski: Time will tell. A lot of technology companies need us and want us to help them scale. So we may have the ability to repurpose and reallocate some of our workforce. Over 70% of our workforce is technologists.
WSJ: Have you met with Elon Musk or President Trump as part of your conversations with the administration?
Rozanski: I should not talk about who I have and have not met with, but we’re engaging. I will talk to anybody who will talk to me. There’s a natural skepticism about this industry: Is it on the side of change, or is it going to resist change? A lot of my argument is Booz Allen is on the side of change.
WSJ: Is Booz too concentrated in government work?
Rozanski: About three-quarters of the work we do is national security-oriented. The consequence is that it limits some other things we would want to do, or we could do, serving governments around the world and even serving commercial clients.
WSJ: Are there conversations at the board level to broaden your work?
Rozanski: At any time, all options are on the table. We need to find better ways to offer that to a broader set of customers in a way that does not limit our ability to serve the U.S. government the way the government needs to be served.
WSJ: What’s the toughest request the administration has made of you so far?
Rozanski: The self-examination. It’s not easy to take a look at every contract and say: Could this be done by someone else? Could this be done by the government? That’s been a challenging, but very valid, request.
WSJ: A year from now—after this cost review—how different will Booz Allen look?
Rozanski: I really, sincerely hope DOGE is successful, not just in identifying the inefficiencies, but also in removing barriers to competition and burdens that add unnecessary cost. We really are fast becoming the company that brings dual-use technology to the government. I do believe that there’s a path for us to increase the size of the portfolio outside of direct federal government work.
WSJ: One argument is that cuts to the federal workforce will ultimately benefit contractors like Booz Allen. Do you agree?
Rozanski: If we’re replacing one person for one person, that is not to the benefit of the government. If we are actually bringing technology in to make people more effective and more efficient, to make things happen faster, to deliver better national security, that is the answer. And in that, Booz Allen has a lot of opportunity.
Deloitte To Lay Off U.S. Consultants After Government Cost Crackdown
Federal government continues to challenge firms’ contracts, forcing them to justify prices, sources say.
Deloitte is cutting U.S. workers in its consulting business after the federal government demanded it find ways to shrink the cost of government projects it is working on.
The Big Four accounting firm didn’t specify how many employees would be targeted. “Modest personnel actions” would be taken in the coming weeks based on government clients’ evolving needs, the company said.
Deloitte also said voluntary employee turnover had slowed down. Since more consultants had stayed in their jobs in recent months, that contributed to the need to reduce its workforce, according to a U.S. spokesman. Overall demand for Deloitte’s advisory services remains strong, he added.
Deloitte’s U.S. management consulting business was flat last year, growing less than 1% in 2024, compared with 17.8% the previous year and 25.5% the year before that.
Deloitte’s U.S. workforce totaled nearly 173,000 at the end of 2024.
The company is among the largest U.S. consulting firms to the federal government. This week those firms offered to cut billions of dollars from their contracts with agencies in response to a General Services Administration deadline that required them to justify their contracts and propose cuts.
The GSA is already beginning to challenge those submissions, pressing for even deeper cuts, according to people familiar with the review process.
Accounting firms have continued to experience slower-than-expected levels of voluntary attrition after aggressively hiring people during the pandemic.
Layoffs at several firms have centered on the advisory side, for which revenue growth has generally slowed as corporate clients pull back on certain services.
Deloitte’s cuts have included a 1.5% reduction of its U.S. staff in 2023.
Related Articles:
Bitcoin Information & Resources (#GotBitcoin?)
What Crypto Users Need Know About Changes At The SEC
The Ultimate Resource For The Bitcoin Miner And The Mining Industry (Page#2) #GotBitcoin
How Cryptocurrency Can Help In Paying Universal Basic Income (#GotBitcoin)
Gautam Adani Was Briefly World’s Richest Man Only To Be Brought Down By An American Short-Seller
Global Crypto Industry Pledges Aid To Turkey Following Deadly Earthquakes
Money Supply Growth Went Negative Again In December Another Sign Of Recession #GotBitcoin
Here Is How To Tell The Difference Between Bitcoin And Ethereum
Crypto Investors Can Purchase Bankruptcy ‘Put Options’ To Protect Funds On Binance, Coinbase, Kraken
Bitcoin Developers Must Face UK Trial Over Lost Cryptoassets
Google Issues Warning For 2 Billion Chrome Users
How A Lawsuit Against The IRS Is Trying To Expand Privacy For Crypto Users
IRS Uses Cellphone Location Data To Find Suspects
IRS Failed To Collect $2.4 Billion In Taxes From Millionaires
Treasury Calls For Crypto Transfers Over $10,000 To Be Reported To IRS
Can The IRS Be Trusted With Your Data?
US Ransomware Attack Suspect Hails From A Small Ukrainian Town
Alibaba Admits It Was Slow To Report Software Bug After Beijing Rebuke
Japan Defense Ministry Finds Security Threat In Hack
Raoul Pal Believes Institutions Have Finished Taking Profits As Year Winds Up
Yosemite Is Forcing Native American Homeowners To Leave Without Compensation. Here’s Why
What Is Dollar Cost Averaging Bitcoin?
Ultimate Resource On Bitcoin Unit Bias
Best Travel Credit Cards of 2022-2023
A Guarded Generation: How Millennials View Money And Investing (#GotBitcoin)
Bitcoin Enthusiast And CEO Brian Armstrong Buys Los Angeles Home For $133 Million
Nasdaq-Listed Blockchain Firm BTCS To Offer Dividend In Bitcoin; Shares Surge
Ultimate Resource On Kazakhstan As Second In Bitcoin Mining Hash Rate In The World After US
Ultimate Resource On Solana Outages And DDoS Attacks
How Jessica Simpson Almost Lost Her Name And Her Billion Dollar Empire
Sidney Poitier, Actor Who Made Oscars History, Dies At 94
Green Comet Will Be Visible As It Passes By Earth For First Time In 50,000 Years
FTX (SBF) Got Approval From F.D.I.C., State Regulators And Federal Reserve To Buy Tiny Bank!!!
Joe Rogan: I Have A Lot Of Hope For Bitcoin
Teen Cyber Prodigy Stumbled Onto Flaw Letting Him Hijack Teslas
Spyware Finally Got Scary Enough To Freak Lawmakers Out—After It Spied On Them
The First Nuclear-Powered Bitcoin Mine Is Here. Maybe It Can Clean Up Energy FUD
The World’s Best Crypto Policies: How They Do It In 37 Nations
Tonga To Copy El Salvador’s Bill Making Bitcoin Legal Tender, Says Former MP
Wordle Is The New “Lingo” Turning Fans Into Argumentative Strategy Nerds
Prospering In The Pandemic, Some Feel Financial Guilt And Gratitude
Is Art Therapy The Path To Mental Well-Being?
New York, California, New Jersey, And Alabama Move To Ban ‘Forever Chemicals’ In Firefighting Foam
The Mystery Of The Wasting House-Cats
What Pet Owners Should Know About Chronic Kidney Disease In Dogs And Cats
Pets Score Company Perks As The ‘New Dependents’
Why Is My Cat Rubbing His Face In Ants?
Natural Cure For Hyperthyroidism In Cats Including How To Switch Him/Her To A Raw Food Diet
Ultimate Resource For Cat Lovers
FDA Approves First-Ever Arthritis Pain Management Drug For Cats
Ultimate Resource On Duke of York’s Prince Andrew And His Sex Scandal
Walmart Filings Reveal Plans To Create Cryptocurrency, NFTs
Bitcoin’s Dominance of Crypto Payments Is Starting To Erode
T-Mobile Says Hackers Stole Data On About 37 Million Customers
Jack Dorsey Announces Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund
More Than 100 Millionaires Signed An Open Letter Asking To Be Taxed More Heavily
Federal Regulator Says Credit Unions Can Partner With Crypto Providers
What’s Behind The Fascination With Smash-And-Grab Shoplifting?
Train Robberies Are A Problem In Los Angeles, And No One Agrees On How To Stop Them
US Stocks Historically Deliver Strong Gains In Fed Hike Cycles (GotBitcoin)
Ian Alexander Jr., Only Child of Regina King, Dies At Age 26
Amazon Ends Its Charity Donation Program Amazonsmile After Other Cost-Cutting Efforts
Indexing Is Coming To Crypto Funds Via Decentralized Exchanges
Doctors Show Implicit Bias Towards Black Patients
Darkmail Pushes Privacy Into The Hands Of NSA-Weary Customers
3D Printing Make Anything From Candy Bars To Hand Guns
Stealing The Blood Of The Young May Make You More Youthful
Henrietta Lacks And Her Remarkable Cells Will Finally See Some Payback
AL_A Wins Approval For World’s First Magnetized Fusion Power Plant
Want To Be Rich? Bitcoin’s Limited Supply Cap Means You Only Need 0.01 BTC
Smart Money Is Buying Bitcoin Dip. Stocks, Not So Much
McDonald’s Jumps On Bitcoin Memewagon, Crypto Twitter Responds
America COMPETES Act Would Be Disastrous For Bitcoin Cryptocurrency And More
Lyn Alden On Bitcoin, Inflation And The Potential Coming Energy Shock
Inflation And A Tale of Cantillionaires
El Salvador Plans Bill To Adopt Bitcoin As Legal Tender
Miami Mayor Says City Employees Should Be Able To Take Their Salaries In Bitcoin
Vast Troves of Classified Info Undermine National Security, Spy Chief Says
BREAKING: Arizona State Senator Introduces Bill To Make Bitcoin Legal Tender
San Francisco’s Historic Surveillance Law May Get Watered Down
How Bitcoin Contributions Funded A $1.4M Solar Installation In Zimbabwe
California Lawmaker Says National Privacy Law Is a Priority
The Pandemic Turbocharged Online Privacy Concerns
How To Protect Your Online Privacy While Working From Home
Researchers Use GPU Fingerprinting To Track Users Online
Japan’s $1 Trillion Crypto Market May Ease Onerous Listing Rules
Ultimate Resource On A Weak / Strong Dollar’s Impact On Bitcoin
Fed Money Printer Goes Into Reverse (Quantitative Tightening): What Does It Mean For Crypto?
Crypto Market Is Closer To A Bottom Than Stocks (#GotBitcoin)
When World’s Central Banks Get It Wrong, Guess Who Pays The Price😂😹🤣 (#GotBitcoin)
“Better Days Ahead With Crypto Deleveraging Coming To An End” — Joker
Crypto Funds Have Seen Record Investment Inflow In Recent Weeks
Bitcoin’s Epic Run Is Winning More Attention On Wall Street
Ultimate Resource For Crypto Mergers And Acquisitions (M&A) (#GotBitcoin)
Why Wall Street Is Literally Salivating Over Bitcoin
Nasdaq-Listed MicroStrategy And Others Wary Of Looming Dollar Inflation, Turns To Bitcoin And Gold
Bitcoin For Corporations | Michael Saylor | Bitcoin Corporate Strategy
Ultimate Resource On Myanmar’s Involvement With Crypto-Currencies
‘I Cry Every Day’: Olympic Athletes Slam Food, COVID Tests And Conditions In Beijing
Does Your Baby’s Food Contain Toxic Metals? Here’s What Our Investigation Found
Ultimate Resource For Pro-Crypto Lobbying And Non-Profit Organizations
Ultimate Resource On BlockFi, Celsius And Nexo
Petition Calling For Resignation Of U.S. Securities/Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler
100 Million Americans Can Legally Bet on the Super Bowl. A Spot Bitcoin ETF? Forget About it!
Green Finance Isn’t Going Where It’s Needed
Shedding Some Light On The Murky World Of ESG Metrics
SEC Targets Greenwashers To Bring Law And Order To ESG
BlackRock (Assets Under Management $7.4 Trillion) CEO: Bitcoin Has Caught Our Attention
Canada’s Major Banks Go Offline In Mysterious (Bank Run?) Hours-Long Outage (#GotBitcoin)
On-Chain Data: A Framework To Evaluate Bitcoin
On Its 14th Birthday, Bitcoin’s 1,690,706,971% Gain Looks Kind of… Well Insane
The Most Important Health Metric Is Now At Your Fingertips
American Bargain Hunters Flock To A New Online Platform Forged In China
Why We Should Welcome Another Crypto Winter
Traders Prefer Gold, Fiat Safe Havens Over Bitcoin As Russia Goes To War
Music Distributor DistroKid Raises Money At $1.3 Billion Valuation
Nas Selling Rights To Two Songs Via Crypto Music Startup Royal
Ultimate Resource On Music Catalog Deals
Ultimate Resource On Music And NFTs And The Implications For The Entertainment Industry
Lead And Cadmium Could Be In Your Dark Chocolate
Catawba, Native-American Tribe Approves First Digital Economic Zone In The United States
The Miracle Of Blockchain’s Triple Entry Accounting
How And Why To Stimulate Your Vagus Nerve!
Housing Boom Brings A Shortage Of Land To Build New Homes
Biden Lays Out His Blueprint For Fair Housing
No Grave Dancing For Sam Zell Now. He’s Paying Up For Hot Properties
Cracks In The Housing Market Are Starting To Show
Ever-Growing Needs Strain U.S. Food Bank Operations
Food Pantry Helps Columbia Students Struggling To Pay Bills
Food Insecurity Driven By Climate Change Has Central Americans Fleeing To The U.S.
Housing Insecurity Is Now A Concern In Addition To Food Insecurity
Families Face Massive Food Insecurity Levels
US Troops Going Hungry (Food Insecurity) Is A National Disgrace
Everything You Should Know About Community Fridges, From Volunteering To Starting Your Own
Russia’s Independent Journalists Including Those Who Revealed The Pandora Papers Need Your Help
10 Women Who Used Crypto To Make A Difference In 2021
Happy International Women’s Day! Leaders Share Their Experiences In Crypto
Dollar On Course For Worst Performance In Over A Decade (#GotBitcoin)
Juice The Stock Market And Destroy The Dollar!! (#GotBitcoin)
Unusual Side Hustles You May Not Have Thought Of
Ultimate Resource On Global Inflation And Rising Interest Rates (#GotBitcoin)
The Fed Is Setting The Stage For Hyper-Inflation Of The Dollar (#GotBitcoin)
An Antidote To Inflation? ‘Buy Nothing’ Groups Gain Popularity
Why Is Bitcoin Dropping If It’s An ‘Inflation Hedge’?
Lyn Alden Talks Bitcoin, Inflation And The Potential Coming Energy Shock
Ultimate Resource On How Black Families Can Fight Against Rising Inflation (#GotBitcoin)
What The Fed’s Rate Hike Means For Inflation, Housing, Crypto And Stocks
Egyptians Buy Bitcoin Despite Prohibitive New Banking Laws
Archaeologists Uncover Five Tombs In Egypt’s Saqqara Necropolis
History of Alchemy From Ancient Egypt To Modern Times
Former World Bank Chief Didn’t Act On Warnings Of Sexual Harassment
Does Your Hospital or Doctor Have A Financial Relationship With Big Pharma?
Ultimate Resource Covering The Crisis Taking Place In The Nickel Market
Apple Along With Meta And Secret Service Agents Fooled By Law Enforcement Impersonators
Handy Tech That Can Support Your Fitness Goals
How To Naturally Increase Your White Blood Cell Count
Ultimate Source For Russians Oligarchs And The Impact Of Sanctions On Them
Ultimate Source For Bitcoin Price Manipulation By Wall Street
Russia, Sri Lanka And Lebanon’s Defaults Could Be The First Of Many (#GotBitcoin)
Will Community Group Buying Work In The US?
Building And Running Businesses In The ‘Spirit Of Bitcoin’
What Is The Mysterious Liver Disease Hurting (And Killing) Children?
Citigroup Trader Is Scapegoat For Flash Crash In European Stocks (#GotBitcoin)
Bird Flu Outbreak Approaches Worst Ever In U.S. With 37 Million Animals Dead
Financial Inequality Grouped By Race For Blacks, Whites And Hispanics
How Black Businesses Can Prosper From Targeting A Trillion-Dollar Black Culture Market (#GotBitcoin)
Ultimate Resource For Central Bank Digital Currencies (#GotBitcoin) Page#2
Meet The Crypto Angel Investor Running For Congress In Nevada (#GotBitcoin?)
Introducing BTCPay Vault – Use Any Hardware Wallet With BTCPay And Its Full Node (#GotBitcoin?)
How Not To Lose Your Coins In 2020: Alternative Recovery Methods (#GotBitcoin?)
H.R.5635 – Virtual Currency Tax Fairness Act of 2020 ($200.00 Limit) 116th Congress (2019-2020)
Adam Back On Satoshi Emails, Privacy Concerns And Bitcoin’s Early Days
The Prospect of Using Bitcoin To Build A New International Monetary System Is Getting Real
How To Raise Funds For Australia Wildfire Relief Efforts (Using Bitcoin And/Or Fiat )
Former Regulator Known As ‘Crypto Dad’ To Launch Digital-Dollar Think Tank (#GotBitcoin?)
Currency ‘Cold War’ Takes Center Stage At Pre-Davos Crypto Confab (#GotBitcoin?)
A Blockchain-Secured Home Security Camera Won Innovation Awards At CES 2020 Las Vegas
Bitcoin’s Had A Sensational 11 Years (#GotBitcoin?)
Sergey Nazarov And The Creation Of A Decentralized Network Of Oracles
Google Suspends MetaMask From Its Play App Store, Citing “Deceptive Services”
Christmas Shopping: Where To Buy With Crypto This Festive Season
At 8,990,000% Gains, Bitcoin Dwarfs All Other Investments This Decade
Coinbase CEO Armstrong Wins Patent For Tech Allowing Users To Email Bitcoin
Bitcoin Has Got Society To Think About The Nature Of Money
How DeFi Goes Mainstream In 2020: Focus On Usability (#GotBitcoin?)
Dissidents And Activists Have A Lot To Gain From Bitcoin, If Only They Knew It (#GotBitcoin?)
At A Refugee Camp In Iraq, A 16-Year-Old Syrian Is Teaching Crypto Basics
Bitclub Scheme Busted In The US, Promising High Returns From Mining
Bitcoin Advertised On French National TV
Germany: New Proposed Law Would Legalize Banks Holding Bitcoin
How To Earn And Spend Bitcoin On Black Friday 2019
The Ultimate List of Bitcoin Developments And Accomplishments
Charities Put A Bitcoin Twist On Giving Tuesday
Family Offices Finally Accept The Benefits of Investing In Bitcoin
An Army Of Bitcoin Devs Is Battle-Testing Upgrades To Privacy And Scaling
Bitcoin ‘Carry Trade’ Can Net Annual Gains With Little Risk, Says PlanB
Max Keiser: Bitcoin’s ‘Self-Settlement’ Is A Revolution Against Dollar
Blockchain Can And Will Replace The IRS
China Seizes The Blockchain Opportunity. How Should The US Respond? (#GotBitcoin?)
Jack Dorsey: You Can Buy A Fraction Of Berkshire Stock Or ‘Stack Sats’
Bitcoin Price Skyrockets $500 In Minutes As Bakkt BTC Contracts Hit Highs
Bitcoin’s Irreversibility Challenges International Private Law: Legal Scholar
Bitcoin Has Already Reached 40% Of Average Fiat Currency Lifespan
Yes, Even Bitcoin HODLers Can Lose Money In The Long-Term: Here’s How (#GotBitcoin?)
Unicef To Accept Donations In Bitcoin (#GotBitcoin?)
Former Prosecutor Asked To “Shut Down Bitcoin” And Is Now Face Of Crypto VC Investing (#GotBitcoin?)
Switzerland’s ‘Crypto Valley’ Is Bringing Blockchain To Zurich
Next Bitcoin Halving May Not Lead To Bull Market, Says Bitmain CEO
Bitcoin Developer Amir Taaki, “We Can Crash National Economies” (#GotBitcoin?)
Veteran Crypto And Stocks Trader Shares 6 Ways To Invest And Get Rich
Is Chainlink Blazing A Trail Independent Of Bitcoin?
Nearly $10 Billion In BTC Is Held In Wallets Of 8 Crypto Exchanges (#GotBitcoin?)
SEC Enters Settlement Talks With Alleged Fraudulent Firm Veritaseum (#GotBitcoin?)
Blockstream’s Samson Mow: Bitcoin’s Block Size Already ‘Too Big’
Attorneys Seek Bank Of Ireland Execs’ Testimony Against OneCoin Scammer (#GotBitcoin?)
OpenLibra Plans To Launch Permissionless Fork Of Facebook’s Stablecoin (#GotBitcoin?)
Tiny $217 Options Trade On Bitcoin Blockchain Could Be Wall Street’s Death Knell (#GotBitcoin?)
Class Action Accuses Tether And Bitfinex Of Market Manipulation (#GotBitcoin?)
Sharia Goldbugs: How ISIS Created A Currency For World Domination (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin Eyes Demand As Hong Kong Protestors Announce Bank Run (#GotBitcoin?)
How To Securely Transfer Crypto To Your Heirs
‘Gold-Backed’ Crypto Token Promoter Karatbars Investigated By Florida Regulators (#GotBitcoin?)
Crypto News From The Spanish-Speaking World (#GotBitcoin?)
Financial Services Giant Morningstar To Offer Ratings For Crypto Assets (#GotBitcoin?)
‘Gold-Backed’ Crypto Token Promoter Karatbars Investigated By Florida Regulators (#GotBitcoin?)
The Original Sins Of Cryptocurrencies (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin Is The Fraud? JPMorgan Metals Desk Fixed Gold Prices For Years (#GotBitcoin?)
Israeli Startup That Allows Offline Crypto Transactions Secures $4M (#GotBitcoin?)
[PSA] Non-genuine Trezor One Devices Spotted (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin Stronger Than Ever But No One Seems To Care: Google Trends (#GotBitcoin?)
First-Ever SEC-Qualified Token Offering In US Raises $23 Million (#GotBitcoin?)
You Can Now Prove A Whole Blockchain With One Math Problem – Really
Crypto Mining Supply Fails To Meet Market Demand In Q2: TokenInsight
$2 Billion Lost In Mt. Gox Bitcoin Hack Can Be Recovered, Lawyer Claims (#GotBitcoin?)
Fed Chair Says Agency Monitoring Crypto But Not Developing Its Own (#GotBitcoin?)
Wesley Snipes Is Launching A Tokenized $25 Million Movie Fund (#GotBitcoin?)
Mystery 94K BTC Transaction Becomes Richest Non-Exchange Address (#GotBitcoin?)
A Crypto Fix For A Broken International Monetary System (#GotBitcoin?)
Four Out Of Five Top Bitcoin QR Code Generators Are Scams: Report (#GotBitcoin?)
Waves Platform And The Abyss To Jointly Launch Blockchain-Based Games Marketplace (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitmain Ramps Up Power And Efficiency With New Bitcoin Mining Machine (#GotBitcoin?)
Ledger Live Now Supports Over 1,250 Ethereum-Based ERC-20 Tokens (#GotBitcoin?)
Miss Finland: Bitcoin’s Risk Keeps Most Women Away From Cryptocurrency (#GotBitcoin?)
Artist Akon Loves BTC And Says, “It’s Controlled By The People” (#GotBitcoin?)
Ledger Live Now Supports Over 1,250 Ethereum-Based ERC-20 Tokens (#GotBitcoin?)
Co-Founder Of LinkedIn Presents Crypto Rap Video: Hamilton Vs. Satoshi (#GotBitcoin?)
Crypto Insurance Market To Grow, Lloyd’s Of London And Aon To Lead (#GotBitcoin?)
No ‘AltSeason’ Until Bitcoin Breaks $20K, Says Hedge Fund Manager (#GotBitcoin?)
NSA Working To Develop Quantum-Resistant Cryptocurrency: Report (#GotBitcoin?)
Custody Provider Legacy Trust Launches Crypto Pension Plan (#GotBitcoin?)
Vaneck, SolidX To Offer Limited Bitcoin ETF For Institutions Via Exemption (#GotBitcoin?)
Russell Okung: From NFL Superstar To Bitcoin Educator In 2 Years (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin Miners Made $14 Billion To Date Securing The Network (#GotBitcoin?)
Why Does Amazon Want To Hire Blockchain Experts For Its Ads Division?
Argentina’s Economy Is In A Technical Default (#GotBitcoin?)
Blockchain-Based Fractional Ownership Used To Sell High-End Art (#GotBitcoin?)
Portugal Tax Authority: Bitcoin Trading And Payments Are Tax-Free (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin ‘Failed Safe Haven Test’ After 7% Drop, Peter Schiff Gloats (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin Dev Reveals Multisig UI Teaser For Hardware Wallets, Full Nodes (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin Price: $10K Holds For Now As 50% Of CME Futures Set To Expire (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin Realized Market Cap Hits $100 Billion For The First Time (#GotBitcoin?)
Stablecoins Begin To Look Beyond The Dollar (#GotBitcoin?)
Bank Of England Governor: Libra-Like Currency Could Replace US Dollar (#GotBitcoin?)
Binance Reveals ‘Venus’ — Its Own Project To Rival Facebook’s Libra (#GotBitcoin?)
The Real Benefits Of Blockchain Are Here. They’re Being Ignored (#GotBitcoin?)
CommBank Develops Blockchain Market To Boost Biodiversity (#GotBitcoin?)
SEC Approves Blockchain Tech Startup Securitize To Record Stock Transfers (#GotBitcoin?)
SegWit Creator Introduces New Language For Bitcoin Smart Contracts (#GotBitcoin?)
You Can Now Earn Bitcoin Rewards For Postmates Purchases (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin Price ‘Will Struggle’ In Big Financial Crisis, Says Investor (#GotBitcoin?)
Fidelity Charitable Received Over $100M In Crypto Donations Since 2015 (#GotBitcoin?)
Would Blockchain Better Protect User Data Than FaceApp? Experts Answer (#GotBitcoin?)
Just The Existence Of Bitcoin Impacts Monetary Policy (#GotBitcoin?)
What Are The Biggest Alleged Crypto Heists And How Much Was Stolen? (#GotBitcoin?)
IRS To Cryptocurrency Owners: Come Clean, Or Else!
Coinbase Accidentally Saves Unencrypted Passwords Of 3,420 Customers (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin Is A ‘Chaos Hedge, Or Schmuck Insurance‘ (#GotBitcoin?)
Bakkt Announces September 23 Launch Of Futures And Custody
Coinbase CEO: Institutions Depositing $200-400M Into Crypto Per Week (#GotBitcoin?)
Researchers Find Monero Mining Malware That Hides From Task Manager (#GotBitcoin?)
Crypto Dusting Attack Affects Nearly 300,000 Addresses (#GotBitcoin?)
A Case For Bitcoin As Recession Hedge In A Diversified Investment Portfolio (#GotBitcoin?)
SEC Guidance Gives Ammo To Lawsuit Claiming XRP Is Unregistered Security (#GotBitcoin?)
15 Countries To Develop Crypto Transaction Tracking System: Report (#GotBitcoin?)
US Department Of Commerce Offering 6-Figure Salary To Crypto Expert (#GotBitcoin?)
Mastercard Is Building A Team To Develop Crypto, Wallet Projects (#GotBitcoin?)
Canadian Bitcoin Educator Scams The Scammer And Donates Proceeds (#GotBitcoin?)
Amazon Wants To Build A Blockchain For Ads, New Job Listing Shows (#GotBitcoin?)
Shield Bitcoin Wallets From Theft Via Time Delay (#GotBitcoin?)
Blockstream Launches Bitcoin Mining Farm With Fidelity As Early Customer (#GotBitcoin?)
Commerzbank Tests Blockchain Machine To Machine Payments With Daimler (#GotBitcoin?)
Man Takes Bitcoin Miner Seller To Tribunal Over Electricity Bill And Wins (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin’s Computing Power Sets Record As Over 100K New Miners Go Online (#GotBitcoin?)
Walmart Coin And Libra Perform Major Public Relations For Bitcoin (#GotBitcoin?)
Judge Says Buying Bitcoin Via Credit Card Not Necessarily A Cash Advance (#GotBitcoin?)
Poll: If You’re A Stockowner Or Crypto-Currency Holder. What Will You Do When The Recession Comes?
1 In 5 Crypto Holders Are Women, New Report Reveals (#GotBitcoin?)
Beating Bakkt, Ledgerx Is First To Launch ‘Physical’ Bitcoin Futures In Us (#GotBitcoin?)
Facebook Warns Investors That Libra Stablecoin May Never Launch (#GotBitcoin?)
Government Money Printing Is ‘Rocket Fuel’ For Bitcoin (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin-Friendly Square Cash App Stock Price Up 56% In 2019 (#GotBitcoin?)
Safeway Shoppers Can Now Get Bitcoin Back As Change At 894 US Stores (#GotBitcoin?)
TD Ameritrade CEO: There’s ‘Heightened Interest Again’ With Bitcoin (#GotBitcoin?)
Venezuela Sets New Bitcoin Volume Record Thanks To 10,000,000% Inflation (#GotBitcoin?)
Newegg Adds Bitcoin Payment Option To 73 More Countries (#GotBitcoin?)
China’s Schizophrenic Relationship With Bitcoin (#GotBitcoin?)
More Companies Build Products Around Crypto Hardware Wallets (#GotBitcoin?)
Bakkt Is Scheduled To Start Testing Its Bitcoin Futures Contracts Today (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin Network Now 8 Times More Powerful Than It Was At $20K Price (#GotBitcoin?)
Crypto Exchange BitMEX Under Investigation By CFTC: Bloomberg (#GotBitcoin?)
“Bitcoin An ‘Unstoppable Force,” Says US Congressman At Crypto Hearing (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin Network Is Moving $3 Billion Daily, Up 210% Since April (#GotBitcoin?)
Cryptocurrency Startups Get Partial Green Light From Washington
Fundstrat’s Tom Lee: Bitcoin Pullback Is Healthy, Fewer Searches Аre Good (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin Lightning Nodes Are Snatching Funds From Bad Actors (#GotBitcoin?)
The Provident Bank Now Offers Deposit Services For Crypto-Related Entities (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin Could Help Stop News Censorship From Space (#GotBitcoin?)
US Sanctions On Iran Crypto Mining — Inevitable Or Impossible? (#GotBitcoin?)
US Lawmaker Reintroduces ‘Safe Harbor’ Crypto Tax Bill In Congress (#GotBitcoin?)
EU Central Bank Won’t Add Bitcoin To Reserves — Says It’s Not A Currency (#GotBitcoin?)
The Miami Dolphins Now Accept Bitcoin And Litecoin Crypt-Currency Payments (#GotBitcoin?)
Trump Bashes Bitcoin And Alt-Right Is Mad As Hell (#GotBitcoin?)
Goldman Sachs Ramps Up Development Of New Secret Crypto Project (#GotBitcoin?)
Blockchain And AI Bond, Explained (#GotBitcoin?)
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust Outperformed Indexes In First Half Of 2019 (#GotBitcoin?)
XRP Is The Worst Performing Major Crypto Of 2019 (GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin Back Near $12K As BTC Shorters Lose $44 Million In One Morning (#GotBitcoin?)
As Deutsche Bank Axes 18K Jobs, Bitcoin Offers A ‘Plan ฿”: VanEck Exec (#GotBitcoin?)
Argentina Drives Global LocalBitcoins Volume To Highest Since November (#GotBitcoin?)
‘I Would Buy’ Bitcoin If Growth Continues — Investment Legend Mobius (#GotBitcoin?)
Lawmakers Push For New Bitcoin Rules (#GotBitcoin?)
Facebook’s Libra Is Bad For African Americans (#GotBitcoin?)
Crypto Firm Charity Announces Alliance To Support Feminine Health (#GotBitcoin?)
Canadian Startup Wants To Upgrade Millions Of ATMs To Sell Bitcoin (#GotBitcoin?)
Trump Says US ‘Should Match’ China’s Money Printing Game (#GotBitcoin?)
Casa Launches Lightning Node Mobile App For Bitcoin Newbies (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin Rally Fuels Market In Crypto Derivatives (#GotBitcoin?)
World’s First Zero-Fiat ‘Bitcoin Bond’ Now Available On Bloomberg Terminal (#GotBitcoin?)
Buying Bitcoin Has Been Profitable 98.2% Of The Days Since Creation (#GotBitcoin?)
Another Crypto Exchange Receives License For Crypto Futures
From ‘Ponzi’ To ‘We’re Working On It’ — BIS Chief Reverses Stance On Crypto (#GotBitcoin?)
These Are The Cities Googling ‘Bitcoin’ As Interest Hits 17-Month High (#GotBitcoin?)
Venezuelan Explains How Bitcoin Saves His Family (#GotBitcoin?)
Quantum Computing Vs. Blockchain: Impact On Cryptography
This Fund Is Riding Bitcoin To Top (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin’s Surge Leaves Smaller Digital Currencies In The Dust (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin Exchange Hits $1 Trillion In Trading Volume (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin Breaks $200 Billion Market Cap For The First Time In 17 Months (#GotBitcoin?)
You Can Now Make State Tax Payments In Bitcoin (#GotBitcoin?)
Religious Organizations Make Ideal Places To Mine Bitcoin (#GotBitcoin?)
Goldman Sacs And JP Morgan Chase Finally Concede To Crypto-Currencies (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin Heading For Fifth Month Of Gains Despite Price Correction (#GotBitcoin?)
Breez Reveals Lightning-Powered Bitcoin Payments App For IPhone (#GotBitcoin?)
Big Four Auditing Firm PwC Releases Cryptocurrency Auditing Software (#GotBitcoin?)
Amazon-Owned Twitch Quietly Brings Back Bitcoin Payments (#GotBitcoin?)
JPMorgan Will Pilot ‘JPM Coin’ Stablecoin By End Of 2019: Report (#GotBitcoin?)
Is There A Big Short In Bitcoin? (#GotBitcoin?)
Coinbase Hit With Outage As Bitcoin Price Drops $1.8K In 15 Minutes
Samourai Wallet Releases Privacy-Enhancing CoinJoin Feature (#GotBitcoin?)
There Are Now More Than 5,000 Bitcoin ATMs Around The World (#GotBitcoin?)
You Can Now Get Bitcoin Rewards When Booking At Hotels.Com (#GotBitcoin?)
North America’s Largest Solar Bitcoin Mining Farm Coming To California (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin On Track For Best Second Quarter Price Gain On Record (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin Hash Rate Climbs To New Record High Boosting Network Security (#GotBitcoin?)
Bitcoin Exceeds 1Million Active Addresses While Coinbase Custodies $1.3B In Assets
Why Bitcoin’s Price Suddenly Surged Back $5K (#GotBitcoin?)
Zebpay Becomes First Exchange To Add Lightning Payments For All Users (#GotBitcoin?)
Coinbase’s New Customer Incentive: Interest Payments, With A Crypto Twist (#GotBitcoin?)
The Best Bitcoin Debit (Cashback) Cards Of 2019 (#GotBitcoin?)
Real Estate Brokerages Now Accepting Bitcoin (#GotBitcoin?)
Ernst & Young Introduces Tax Tool For Reporting Cryptocurrencies (#GotBitcoin?)
Recession Is Looming, or Not. Here’s How To Know (#GotBitcoin?)
How Will Bitcoin Behave During A Recession? (#GotBitcoin?)
Many U.S. Financial Officers Think a Recession Will Hit Next Year (#GotBitcoin?)
Definite Signs of An Imminent Recession (#GotBitcoin?)
What A Recession Could Mean for Women’s Unemployment (#GotBitcoin?)
Investors Run Out of Options As Bitcoin, Stocks, Bonds, Oil Cave To Recession Fears (#GotBitcoin?)
Goldman Is Looking To Reduce “Marcus” Lending Goal On Credit (Recession) Caution (#GotBitcoin?)
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.