SALES, RENTALS & LAYAWAYS

PROTECTING EVERYTHING THAT HAS EVER BEEN OF VALUE TO YOU

Open 24/7/365

We Have A Life-Time Warranty /
Guarantee On All Products. (Includes Parts And Labor)

Dollar On Course For Worst Performance In Over A Decade (#GotBitcoin?)

Investors bet that the Fed will be forced to keep rates lower for longer, lowering real yields in U.S. Dollar On Course For Worst Month In Almost A Decade (#GotBitcoin?)

The dollar is on track to close out its worst month since April 2011 as a rise in coronavirus infections across the U.S. threatens to damp the economic recovery and keep low interest rates in place for longer.

Related:

The Fed Is Setting The Stage For Hyper-Inflation Of The Dollar (#GotBitcoin)

Deutsche Bank Short US Dollar Index (USDX)

Juice The Stock Market And Destroy The Dollar!! (#GotBitcoin?)

Bloomberg: Americans Trade Depreciating Dollars For Bitcoin

Hyperinflation Concerns Top The Worry List For UBS Clients

The ICE U.S. Dollar Index, which measures the greenback against a basket of other currencies, weakened 0.8% Monday to its lowest level since June 2018, according to FactSet.

Investors have sold the dollar and bought currencies of countries with lower infection levels in recent weeks. That has erased 3.8% of the currency’s value in July, putting it on track for its worst one-month performance in over nine years.

The recent surge in cases in parts of the U.S. has prompted local authorities to halt or rewind plans to let business activity resume, raising doubts about the prospects for the economy. California, Texas and Florida, which are among the hardest-hit states, together account for more than a quarter of U.S. gross domestic product.

New claims for unemployment benefits, which offer a view on the health of the labor market, last week climbed for the first time in four months, suggesting that the recovery may be faltering.

Weekly applications, which surpassed six million in the last week of March, had previously fallen as government-support programs and the gradual reopening of economies allowed employers to keep staff on payrolls and bring workers back.

Investors are betting that the Federal Reserve will offer a gloomier outlook for the economy following a two-day meeting that ends Wednesday. Fed officials have already warned this month that the economy faces a deeper downturn and more difficult recovery if the country doesn’t take more effective action to slow the spread of the virus.

The economic signals are “telling you that the V-shaped recovery has basically stopped. It’s not V anymore. It’s plateauing,” said Derek Halpenny, head of research for global markets in the European region at MUFG Bank. “The optimism that was there in June will be gone and the message is going to be the Fed needs to do more.”

Monday’s selloff put the ICE dollar index on track for its sharpest one-day decline since May 26. The recent move has been accelerated by the Fed’s decision to slash interest rates to near zero, removing much of the differential between the U.S. and other developed countries where rates have been negative for some time.

The yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note dropped to 0.584% on Monday, from 1.910% at the end of last year, according to Tradeweb.

Real yields, which reflect the value of bond yields after adjusting for inflation expectations, have plunged for Treasurys, contributing to the dollar weakness. That is also pushing up demand for assets that don’t offer a yield, such as gold, by making them more attractive.

“The real-yield attraction of the dollar is less than it has ever been,” said Kit Juckes, a strategist at Société Générale.

The central bank is likely to remain cautious in its comments this week, Mr. Juckes said. “This Fed is a Fed that is working hand in glove with the U.S. government to lessen the blow to the U.S. economy.”

In contrast with the dollar’s decline, U.S. stocks have rallied since March, erasing almost all of the S&P 500 index’s losses for this year and pushing the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite to records. Last week, both benchmarks gave up some of those gains as investors’ optimism waned.

The dollar selloff could stabilize or even reverse as the currency still retains its appeal as a haven asset, said Jane Foley, head of foreign-exchange strategy at Rabobank. Investors are already pricing in a weaker outlook from the Fed and lackluster economic data, likely limiting dollar weakness going further.

“There’s been a big flow out of the U.S. dollar, but we have seen stock markets not so eager to shift higher from current levels in recent weeks,” Ms. Foley said. “I’m wondering if the momentum behind the sell dollar trade has gone a little bit too far.”

Fed Outlook Turns Gloomier As Recession Deepens

Central bank leaders warn of hits to confidence, higher joblessness and more business bankruptcies.

Federal Reserve officials meet Tuesday and Wednesday facing growing doubts about the prospect for a sustained economic rebound due to the nation’s uneven public-health response to the coronavirus.

Officials have warned this month in speeches and interviews that the economy faces a deeper downturn and more difficult recovery if the country doesn’t take more effective action to slow the spread of infection.

Since the Fed’s mid-June policy meeting, virus infection rates have accelerated in many states that were among the first to encourage businesses to reopen. Business leaders and economists have warned that hard-hit industries such as travel, entertainment and hospitality will face a more difficult recovery if consumers don’t feel confident spending money indoors and gathering in large groups.

The Fed isn’t likely to roll out new stimulus measures this week but is debating how to provide more support to the economy once the economic outlook becomes clearer. They could do this by adjusting their purchases of Treasury and mortgage securities and by providing more detail about what conditions would lead them to consider withdrawing stimulus.

Fed officials have focused their recent comments on the imperative of suppressing the virus by more aggressively adopting social-distancing measures, including wearing masks, and by boosting the capacity to test, trace and isolate known infection cases.

“How well we follow the health-care protocols from here is going to be the primary economic tool we have,” said Dallas Fed President Robert Kaplan in a July 16 interview.

After the pandemic triggered widespread shutdowns in March, Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren said he had expected infections to recede by the summer much as it has in Europe. “Unfortunately, that is not the case,” he said in a July 8 interview. “We have not been nearly as successful.”

The longer that infection rates flare up, the harder it will be for a range of industries that employ millions of Americans to recover. That, in turn, could lead to higher spells of extended joblessness, business failure and stress on the banking system.

The economy will face “severe economic consequences” if the public health response doesn’t improve, Mr. Rosengren said. The Fed’s policy response is “not going to be able to offset all the losses if we continue to make serious public health mistakes.”

He said he is particularly troubled about what could happen in the fall, as college students return to campus from around the country, younger students go back to school, and cold weather makes it harder for restaurants to operate outdoor dining.

Regional data from the online reservations site OpenTable shows the Northeast is the only part of the U.S. that saw an increase in restaurant dining through mid-July on a weekly basis, suggesting that consumers are more willing to dine at restaurants in areas where the virus is under control.

The economy added 7.5 million jobs in May and June but still has 14.7 million fewer jobs than before the pandemic.

Coronavirus infections have accelerated in several large states since mid-June, when the Labor Department conducted its most recent survey of payroll growth.

Real-time data tracked by Fed economists suggested that strong gains in hiring in May and June may not be sustained, said Fed governor Lael Brainard in a speech July 14.

“Business leaders are getting worried. Consumers are getting worried,” Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic said July 7 in a discussion hosted by the Tennessee Business Roundtable. “There is a real sense that this might go on longer than we had hoped and we had expected and we had planned for.”

One risk for the Fed is that markets and the public expect it will fix problems its tools aren’t suited for, said former Fed governor Randall Kroszner.

“There is nothing the Fed can do to bring back the airline industry, to replace broken supply chains, to make people feel comfortable going out to shopping malls,” said Mr. Kroszner, who now teaches at the University of Chicago. “People have the view the Fed is so powerful that it can do anything, and it can’t.”

Government policy since March has focused on preserving income for unemployed workers and businesses after the economy was put into the equivalent of a medically induced coma to stop the pandemic’s spread.

Fed officials have broadly supported efforts to offset declines in income for unemployed workers and a drop in revenues for state and local governments.

The Fed has launched emergency-lending programs designed to support market functioning and to lower lending costs for a range of household, government and business borrowers.

Fed Vice Chairman Richard Clarida last month warned the improvements in financial markets may not last due to the path of the virus. At a minimum, the Fed’s lending programs had bought some time for businesses to hang on until an economic recovery spreads, he said.

Officials have expressed alarm that businesses receiving relief from the $510 billion Paycheck Protection Program won’t be able to withstand further declines in demand due to virus fears.

Mr. Kaplan said he has spoken to a range of companies that used those funds to bring back their employees and reopen. Their initial optimism has faded amid renewed slowdowns in business as virus infection rates flare up, and some businesses are seeing a substantial slowdown in foot traffic.

“The jury is now very much out … because they’re not well equipped for another slowdown,” Mr. Kaplan said.

Next Economic Crisis: Developing-Nation Debt

Emerging economies like Zambia’s were ill-prepared for the global recession’s financial pain.

Zambia was once a model in Wall Street’s rush to issue debt for the world’s poorest nations, attracting bigger orders and lower interest rates than some more-developed countries.

Less than a decade later, the Southern African nation is straining to pay back more than $11 billion in loans.

The world is gearing up for a battle over developing-country debt like few it has seen before. Rich and poor countries are at loggerheads with private investors that, over the past decade, replaced governments as the biggest creditors to emerging markets.

Zambia looks set to become a case study in the clash over how to ease the debt load of developing countries that were ill-prepared for the financial pain inflicted by the coronavirus pandemic.

Zambian government debt is on course to surpass 100% of gross domestic product this year, as the International Monetary Fund forecasts the economy will contract 5% —the prediction from October was for 1.7% growth. Without relief, it would need to spend more than a third of its revenue to service debt, and much more in coming years.

In late May, the government appointed Lazard Ltd. as financial adviser, the first step toward a wholesale debt restructuring.

Two months later, talks with creditors are yet to begin, according to people involved in the negotiations.

Commodity prices sent tumbling by the global economic slowdown and a crash in local currencies have left many poor nations like Zambia unable to pay off the legacy of more than a decade of foreign borrowing. The debt—much of it held by banks and fund managers in London, New York and Frankfurt—was supposed to pay for building infrastructure, fighting disease and teaching children.

Instead, governments are struggling to find the cash to fortify their health systems for a wave of Covid-19 cases as debt service eats up large chunks of their revenue.

“Even before the crisis, a lot of countries were facing a lot of debt pressures,” said Abebe Aemro Selassie, director of the IMF’s African Department, “And you now have this really massive and all-encompassing shock.”

The prices of commodities like copper and oil, crucial exports for many emerging-markets, have rebounded somewhat since March. But the slowdown in global growth and trade is still cutting into government finances.

Of the 24 low-income countries that have issued foreign-currency bonds since the turn of the millennium, raising a total $135 billion, at least half —including Ghana and Zambia—are now at high risk of debt distress or already in distress, according to the IMF.

Negotiations taking place on conference calls to provide debt relief have gotten bogged down. Unable to meet face-to-face due to travel restrictions, investors say, it can be difficult to build trust with government officials—and each other—from behind a screen, where body language can be hard to read and concerns about privacy can limit talks.

Different groups of creditors blame each other. Asset managers and hedge funds—a fragmented group that can be slow to reach consensus—point fingers at China, which has also lent heavily to many poor countries.

Western governments, which wrote off debt in previous crises, have said they don’t want to bail out Beijing or private investors. Because much of Chinese debt came from state companies and banks, bondholders say it is unclear whether they would participate in relief measures provided by governments.

The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Failure to resolve this accelerating crisis, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres warned this month, could result in “a situation in which a series of countries in insolvency might trigger a global depression.”

The number of countries looking to multilateral agencies for support and running into legal disputes with creditors could make this the worst emerging-market debt crisis since the 1930s at least, said Kenneth Rogoff, chief economist of the IMF from 2001 to 2003 and now a Harvard University professor.

“They can’t handle that—the New York and London courts can’t, the IMF can’t,” he said. “It is a case of too many patients coming to the hospital at once.”

The IMF says more than 100 countries have come to it for help to fund their coronavirus battle since March. Of the total $250 billion of financing the IMF has committed, about one-third was approved in just the past four months.

The financial crisis is exacerbating humanitarian disasters in many nations, threatening to set back decades of gains in health care, nutrition and education, aid agencies say. Debt-relief advocacy groups like the Jubilee Debt Campaign say they worry that emergency funding meant to bolster governments’ coronavirus responses is instead paying off foreign debts.

At least 6.9 million of Zambia’s 17.4 million citizens don’t have sufficient food, up 290,000 from three months ago, according to the World Food Programme. The country, which had recorded 4,481 cases of Covid-19 as of July 26, has just six laboratories that can test for the disease.

‘Debt Trap’

The lack of preparedness for the pandemic’s financial impact traces to First World efforts 15 years ago to help wipe out the developing world’s debt. With proponents ranging from then-President George W. Bush to rock band U2’s star Bono, rich nations and multilateral lenders like the World Bank forgave $125 billion in the early 2000s to end what was called a “debt trap”—in which nations spend more on interest than health, infrastructure and education.

The programs—the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative and the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative—aimed to wean poor nations off the IMF, World Bank and Western governments.

Those institutions, the argument went, would teach developing countries how to borrow directly from financial markets; international investors would supply more funds than multilateral agencies could and force financial discipline.

Donor countries and organizations fanned out to give technical assistance on bond markets. The U.S. paid for countries to secure credit ratings. Wall Street banks saw an opening to new markets offering better returns than the ultralow interest rates in the West.

Many countries that borrowed had weak institutions and little record in implementing economic reforms. But competition to underwrite the bonds was so fierce that some of the poorest countries paid negligible fees, according to investment bankers in the region.

Caleb Fundanga, a retired Zambian central-bank governor who left in 2011, recalls bankers swarming him at annual meetings the IMF organized in Washington, D.C. “We were telling them that we were not ready to go into the market,” he said.

But, bolstered by a booming economy, Zambia decided to go all-in. The price of its main resource, copper, was soaring, thanks to Chinese demand. To fund a revamp of its railway to better ship the landlocked nation’s metal to ports, and other infrastructure projects, Zambia offered its first-ever foreign-currency bond in 2012.

Donor funding helped it secure a bond rating several notches below investment grade. Demand for the bond—underwritten by Barclays PLC and Deutsche Bank AG —was so strong the yield came in below the target at 5.625%, less than what Spain paid at the time.

As orders piled up on the day of the offering, Zambia’s then-finance minister, Alexander Chikwanda, said the president, his late nephew Michael Sata, urged him to increase the offering’s size. “I explained to him that the debt servicing would be a problem,” Mr. Chikwanda said, but he increased the deal to $750 million from $500 million.

The country issued two more dollar bonds in the next three years, raising a total of $3 billion supposed to finance roads, power grids and other infrastructure at much higher interest rates.

“There was a lot of money from the West that could be accessed with very little conditionality,” said Shebo Nalishebo, who was an analyst for a government-funded think tank advising the finance ministry at the time.

Charles Russon, chief executive for corporate and investment banking at ABSA Group Ltd., which owns Barclays’ former African operations, said the Zambian bonds were assessed to be in the best interest of the country when they were issued, but that “in hindsight now it looks a little more challenging.”

Deutsche Bank declined to comment.

Zambia also started borrowing heavily from China as part of Beijing’s Belt and Road program, plowing billions of dollars into roads, power plants and airports and signing loan agreements for many years to come. Zambia doesn’t disclose how much it owes to Beijing, but President Edgar Lungu this month asked Chinese President Xi Jinping to cancel some of the debt, according to a statement issued by his office.

Deteriorating Fortunes

Soon the country’s fortunes deteriorated. An economic slowdown in China mid-decade halved the price of copper, shrinking dollar revenue needed to help support bond payments.

Zambia’s currency, the kwacha, has dropped from around five to the dollar in 2012 to around 18 today, so the country would now have to pay back more than three times what it borrowed in local currency terms, leaving aside interest. The government says its total external debt stood at $11.2 billion at the end of 2019.

Disagreements over the size of this debt, which the IMF has said was already at $11.3 billion at the end of 2018, have stopped the fund from coming to its help. The IMF said this month that it is continuing talks with Zambian officials on how to ensure debt sustainability.

Similar patterns were emerging elsewhere in Africa. By the third quarter of last year, debt levels in sub-Saharan Africa’s poorest countries had jumped to over 60% of GDP on average, from 38% a decade earlier, according to the Institute of International Finance, or IIF, a financial-industry lobbying group.

Beijing keeps the terms of its programs under wraps. But estimates from the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies suggest African governments and their state-owned enterprises accumulated around $143 billion in loans from China between 2000 and 2017.

Some of those countries were left not only with heavy debt but also without some of the development gains borrowing was supposed to bring.

Zambia’s neighbor Angola raised $8 billion over the years after a debut bond in 2015 to fund upgrades to water, electricity and road networks. An advisory firm hired by the government to monitor 26 of those projects said only four were ever initiated.

With oil prices low, Angolan government revenues are now less than what is needed for debt payments. A spokesman for Angola’s finance ministry, which has pledged to repay private investors, didn’t respond to requests for comment.

As the virus spread, the Group of 20 major economies in April called on private investors to join governments in halting debt payments for some of the world’s poorest countries until the end of year.

The plan has since been paralyzed. Credit-rating firms have made clear that restructuring private-sector borrowing could count as a default. During investor calls organized by Rothschild & Co. following the G-20 announcement, some governments were eager to reassure lenders that they don’t need debt forgiveness, worried they would be cut off from future borrowing.

As yet, no eligible country has requested private-sector support, according to the IIF.

World Bank Group President David Malpass said the scale of government borrowing from new sources, like China and commercial creditors, places poor countries in new territory, adding: “It’s vitally important that all creditors participate and don’t create excuses to free ride on the others.”

Without a plan in sight, investors and governments are looking to what happens with Zambia, whose 2012 bond falls due in 2022, to chart a way for countries squeezed by debt held by private creditors and China.

“Zambia might end up being a template,” said Hans Humes, founder of New York-based Greylock Capital Management, which owns Zambian bonds.

Updated: 7-30-2020

Dollar Falls To Lowest Level In Over 2 Years While Gold, Silver, Bitcoin Continue To Shine

The dollar on Thursday dropped to its lowest level since May 2018 as the Federal Reserve said it plans to keep interest rates close to zero, and inflation hedges continue to show strength.

* The dollar’s trade-weighted index – a measure of its value relative to a basket of other dominant currencies – dropped to $93.04 Thursday afternoon.

* The last time the index traded this low was on May 15, 2018, according to TradingView.

* As the dollar weakens, gold continues to trade near its new all-time highs, reaching $1,980 on Tuesday.

* The yellow metal has gained more than 10% in July.

* Silver has rallied nearly 30% in July, trading at $23.26 at last check.

* Bitcoin, previously stuck trading in a tight range between $9,000 and $10,000 for nearly two months, followed the rallies in precious metals when it broke above $11,400 on Tuesday.

* Bitcoin has soared 53% in 2020, according to Messari.

“In the coming weeks you’ll see the dollar weakening further,” Qi Gao, a currency strategist at Scotiabank, told the Financial Times.

Updated: 8-31-2020

China’s Yuan Strengthens as Trade and Economic Concerns Fade

Relatively high interest rates, plus a broader selloff in the dollar, also buoy China’s currency.

China’s yuan has rallied to its strongest levels in more than a year, as the country’s economy continues to recover and investors grow less concerned about fresh U.S. tariffs.

On Monday, the currency traded at around 6.85 to the dollar in both the tightly controlled onshore market and freer offshore markets in Hong Kong and elsewhere, building on gains registered in the previous trading session.

“The clear outperformance by the Chinese economy versus the developed economies is favoring the yuan,” said Mansoor Mohi-uddin, chief economist at the Bank of Singapore.

Surveys released Monday showed Chinese business activity continued to expand for a sixth straight month in August.

Prospects of a calmer relationship between the U.S. and China were also boosting the yuan, Mr. Mohi-uddin said. “The markets seem to be favoring a potential change in leadership in the U.S., and they are looking through the current tensions.”

Last week senior U.S. and Chinese officials affirmed their commitment to the two countries’ phase-one trade deal.

“In August, the market has gotten a lot more comfortable with the idea that neither the U.S. nor the Chinese side has the inclinations nor the appetite to walk back on the trade deal,” said Sameer Goel, chief Asia macro strategist at Deutsche Bank.

Mr. Goel said the yuan was now in the middle of its two-year trading range against a basket of currencies. He said that meant Chinese policy makers were likely more comfortable letting the currency join a broader rally against the dollar, especially with less risk of the trade deal collapsing.

On Friday, the offshore yuan closed below 6.86 to the dollar for the first time since May 2019, according to Tullett Prebon data. As of Monday afternoon in Hong Kong, the onshore yuan had strengthened slightly further to about 6.849 per dollar, while the offshore yuan was at 6.848.

A widening gap between interest rates in the U.S. and higher rates available in China is also boosting the yuan, as investors seek higher-yielding assets. Foreign purchases of Chinese bonds hit a record in the second quarter.

The Federal Reserve’s shift in how it sets interest rates indicates the U.S. central bank has a tolerance for policy easing, said Chi Lo, senior economist for greater China at BNP Paribas Asset Management, implying a weaker dollar.

But he said China has much less need for lower interest rates. That will support the yuan, Mr. Lo said, as will a likely recovery in annual economic growth to a range of 6 to 6.5% in 2021.

Iris Pang, chief economist for Greater China at ING Bank NV in Hong Kong, said a tumbling dollar in recent weeks had helped boost the yuan.

She said China’s move on Friday to restrict artificial intelligence-related exports, in retaliation against U.S. pressure on Chinese technology companies, had fueled further gains in the currency on Monday.

“This shows that China has the room to fight back and there’s some resilience in the economy to buffer this pressure,” Ms. Pang said.

Updated: 12-20-2020

Yellen Pressed To Back Strong Dollar In Reversing Trump-Era Tone

Janet Yellen once touted the benefits of a weaker greenback for exports, but as the incoming Treasury secretary, she faces pressure to return the U.S. to a “strong-dollar” policy — and may cause trembles on Wall Street if she doesn’t.

The greenback’s tumble this year — it’s heading for the second-biggest drop in the past decade and a half — has already stoked foreign policy makers’ concerns, thanks to the competitive advantage it gives the U.S. Even a tacit endorsement of a weakening dollar could spur tensions with trading partners.

Yellen, President-elect Joe Biden’s pick for Treasury chief, if confirmed will take office about a month after her predecessor labeled two countries as currency manipulators and named 10 on a watch list for artificial interference. The moves, unveiled Dec. 16, capped a volatile period for currency commentary under President Donald Trump’s administration that heightens focus on Yellen’s approach.

The U.S. adopted a policy of favoring a “strong” dollar in 1995, marking an end to regular calls for other countries to drive their currencies higher. While the mantra did evolve from one Treasury chief to another, no administration from then until the Trump years communicated, as the president did in 2017, that the dollar was “getting too strong.”

While they sometimes did endorse a strong dollar — always from a long-term perspective — Trump and outgoing Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said that a weaker currency would help American exports. Mnuchin also said an “excessively strong dollar” could have negative short-term effects on the U.S. economy.

It’s a sentiment Yellen herself has suggested she shared in the past.

As president of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco in 2004, Yellen helped establish a view among investors that the U.S. central bank saw a weaker currency as a help in addressing the country’s current-account deficit. As the Fed’s chair a decade later, she continued to make that connection, saying repeatedly that dollar appreciation posed a drag for American exports.

A Biden transition spokesperson declined to comment on Yellen and dollar policy.

It’s the Treasury secretary’s job to oversee currency policy, and at least two former holders of that title have urged Yellen to make clear she doesn’t favor dollar depreciation. That’s after Mnuchin went so far as to entertain Trump’s consideration to forcibly weaken the dollar in mid-2019.

Predecessors’ Calls

“It would be unwise to appear actively devaluationist or indifferent to the dollar,” Larry Summers, who was Treasury secretary under Bill Clinton and national economic adviser under Barack Obama, said last month.

Summers highlighted that the dollar’s dominant role in the global financial system puts the onus on the Treasury to manage its responsibilities carefully. Favoring a strong dollar is “prudent” for the incoming secretary, in particular given Biden’s plans for “expansionary policy,” said Summers, who is a paid contributor to Bloomberg.

Hank Paulson, who served as Treasury secretary under George W. Bush, made the same point in a Wall Street Journal opinon column this month.

“Interest rates are at historic lows, and the federal debt is larger as a share of the economy than at any time since the end of World War II,” Paulson wrote. “It is critically important to bend down the steep trajectory of the rising national debt. Otherwise, the dollar will eventually be debased. Washington won’t be able to pay its bills.”

Those aren’t the kinds of concerns Yellen needed to focus on during her tenure at the Fed, which began in the 1990s as a board member. She instead looked at how the exchange rate factored into the economic outlook, and what the implications were for setting monetary policy. The following comments illustrate a consistent take over time:

* “We have a huge current account deficit, and that is a drain on demand in our economy. A lower dollar ultimately should feed through into more demand,” Yellen said in September 2004.

* The drop in the dollar from 2002 “will help to improve our gaping trade deficit and thereby offset some of the otherwise contractionary effects of the tighter credit conditions,” Yellen said in December 2007.

* “The dollar has strengthened quite a lot over the last year and a half,” Yellen told lawmakers in December 2015. “The strength of the dollar is one factor that puts — means that monetary policy for the U.S. is more likely to follow a gradual path.”

* “A stronger dollar does have a depressing effect. It creates channels through which domestic demand is depressed. At the moment, net exports — well, for quite some time and probably going forward, they will be somewhat of a drag on U.S. growth,” Yellen said in June 2016.

“Yellen as a Fed person can talk about the benefits of a weaker dollar with regard to inflation and exports,” said Brad Bechtel, global head of foreign exchange at Jefferies LLC. “But as a Treasury secretary the typical stance is a strong dollar policy.”

The dollar’s exchange rate has been set by the market since the 1970s, and official comments don’t tend to have more than a fleeting impact on the greenback, but they are still viewed closely by overseas policy makers along with investors.

The new administration’s pronouncements will be keenly eyed after the Mnuchin Treasury’s latest report on overseas foreign-exchange practices. For a quarter century, the U.S. held off on declaring any trading partner as a manipulator of its currency.

Mnuchin applied that label three times — for China from August 2019 to January, and, in Wednesday’s announcement, for Switzerland and Vietnam.

Manipulator Tag

Switzerland’s central bank quickly rebuffed Mnuchin’s demand for it to scale back intervention in the franc. Taiwan, which is on the so-called monitoring list, said the Treasury inaccurately represented its foreign-exchange purchases.

On that score, Yellen has previously indicated a more understanding view of exchange-rate movements. In 2019, she said, “It’s really difficult and treacherous to define when a country is gaming its currency to gain trade advantages.”

“She will likely advocate a high hurdle both to express and implement an active dollar policy and also to be cautious in accusing trade partners of currency manipulation,” Daniel Hui, a JPMorgan Chase & Co. global foreign-exchange strategist, wrote in a Dec. 14 report.

Regardless of whether she actively returns the U.S. to a strong dollar policy or tries to shy away from any comments, Yellen is seen bringing stability and predictability to any comments on the $6.6 trillion-a-day currency market. She underscored the importance of message discipline when, as Fed chair, she called on her colleagues in 2014 to be mindful of what they said about the dollar and highlighted that it’s the Treasury that speaks for the U.S. government on the currency.

“By longstanding agreement, the Treasury speaks for the U.S. government on international economic policy and the dollar,” Yellen observed in the late-October 2014 Fed policy meeting.

More than six years later, that’s just the role she’ll be expected to take on.

Updated: 1-5-2021

Dollar Slumps As U.S. Inflation Expectations Rise And Oil Surges

The dollar fell against all its major developed-market peers Tuesday as a decision by major oil exporting countries to curb supply helped to lift crude, stocks rebounded and U.S. inflation expectations climbed.

A move by West Texas crude above $50 a barrel helped to trigger a deeper selloff in the greenback, with the Australian dollar and other commodity-related currencies gaining the most. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index extended its decline to as much as 0.6%, taking it close to the nearly three-year low it touched on Monday.

The U.S. currency was already under pressure as traders focused on the outcome of two key Senate elections in Georgia that will determine whether Democrats can take unified control of government. Polls there are due to close at 7 p.m. New York time, although final results may take days to determine.

“A Blue Wave sweep would most likely be dollar-negative due to increased stimulus, debt issuance,” said Win Thin, global head of currency strategy at Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. He also noted that increasing coronavirus case numbers in the U.S. are also weighing on the dollar.

Concerns about inflation were clearly evident in the bond market, which saw the breakeven rate on 10-year Treasuries rise as high as 2.0455%, the highest level since November 2018. The Institute for Supply Management’s gauge of prices paid for manufacturing materials, which came in higher than expected, also gave a boost to the inflation outlook.

* The Australian dollar led gains, rising as much as 1.5% to 77.78 U.S. cents, the strongest since 2018, while the New Zealand and Norwegian currencies also surged

* The euro was up as much as 0.5% to $1.2306

* The yen, although often seen as a haven, also gained versus the greenback, appreciating to 102.61 per dollar, the strongest since March

Updated: 2-20-2021

Cryptocurrencies Here To Stay As Serious Asset Class, Bitcoin Making Progress To Replace Dollar

Morgan Stanley’s chief global strategist says that “regardless of where the price of bitcoin goes next, cryptocurrencies are here to stay as a serious asset class.” He added that bitcoin is making progress towards replacing the dollar as a medium of exchange.

Morgan Stanley Bullish On Bitcoin And Cryptocurrencies


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Morgan Stanley’s head of emerging markets and chief global strategist, Ruchir Sharma, published a report entitled “Why Crypto Is Coming Out of the Shadows” on the Morgan Stanley website last week.

“Despite the jitters natural in a global pandemic, cryptocurrencies are rapidly gaining popular support as alternatives to gold (a store of value) and the dollar (as a means of payment),” he began. The strategist elaborated:

We see fundamental reasons to believe that — regardless of where the price of bitcoin goes next — cryptocurrencies are here to stay as a serious asset class.

Sharma explained that one reason “is growing distrust in fiat currencies, thanks to massive money printing by central banks.” Another reason is “generational,” as young people view cryptocurrency as an improvement over metal coins. He continued: “The worst knock on cryptocurrency as a store of value is its volatility, but unflinching demand from millennials has helped lower the volatility of bitcoin, even during the pandemic.”

The strategist added that this age group believes “the open-source software behind Bitcoin makes it more transparent, transferrable and trustworthy than paper money printed by governments.” He emphasized that “this crypto-confidence may reach even deeper in emerging markets, where distrust in centralized authority runs high.” Sharma opined:

Governments have been slow to recognize this evolution … Bitcoin is also starting to make progress on its ambition to replace the dollar as a medium of exchange.

When the pandemic hit, the dollar was the world’s preferred reserve currency. However, “led by the Fed, every major central bank has been printing money madly to keep economies afloat during the pandemic, undermining confidence in all national currencies,” he described, adding that 20% of “all dollars in circulation were printed in 2020, and that binge was a huge boost to the appeal of bitcoin.”

The Morgan Stanley Strategist Detailed:

Today, virtually all bitcoins are held as an investment, not used to pay bills, but that is changing.

“Last year popular payment platforms started accepting bitcoin and other digital currencies, a major step forward in their campaign to challenge the dollar,” he concluded.

Updated: 3-28-2021

House Prices Are Inflating Around The World

Pandemic-related stimulus, ultralow rates and changes in buyer behavior are turbocharging markets from Europe to Asia.

As the U.S. housing market booms, a parallel rise in residential real-estate prices across the world from Amsterdam to Auckland is raising fears of possible bubbles and prompting some governments to intervene to prevent their markets from overheating.

Policy makers were already worried about high property prices in parts of Europe, Asia and Canada before the pandemic, especially as years of low interest rates kept demand strong.

But now the trillions of dollars of stimulus deployed world-wide to fight the effects of Covid-19, along with changes in buying patterns as more people work from home, are turbocharging markets further.

That is putting policy makers in a bind. Many want to keep interest rates low to sustain the post-pandemic recovery, but they worry about people taking on too much debt to buy houses whose prices could stagnate or fall later. Other tools they have to cool demand, like tighter mortgage restrictions, aren’t always working, or are being postponed as authorities try to ensure broader economic growth stays on track.

The Danish central bank recently warned that cheap financing and savings that expanded during the pandemic could lead to people taking on more debt to purchase houses and property prices spiraling upward.

“It is clear that rising [house] prices of between 5% and 10% annually, depending on the market we are talking about, are not sustainable in the long run,” said Karsten Biltoft, assistant governor at the central bank.

In China, regulators have tried tamping down property markets to cool what one senior banking official referred to as a “bubble,” to little avail.

Property prices are up 16% over the past year in the city of Shenzhen, for example. In New Zealand, authorities recently tightened mortgage lending standards, with median home prices climbing 23% in February from a year earlier to a record.

In Sydney, where property prices also recently hit records, new mortgage demand is so high that some banks are struggling to keep up, said Christian Stevens, senior credit adviser at mortgage brokerage Shore Financial. Turnaround times for processing mortgage applications have increased from a few days to more than a month in some cases.

“It’s crazy,” he said. “We’ve never been this busy or seen this much inquiry. And it doesn’t look like it’s slowing down anytime soon.”

In the 37 wealthy countries that make up the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, home prices hit a record in the third quarter of 2020, according to OECD data. Prices rose almost 5% on the year, the fastest in nearly 20 years.

The U.S. has also seen strong house price appreciation, though economists generally aren’t too worried. Compared with previous periods of housing-market exuberance, buyers have higher credit ratings and are putting down more cash upfront on purchases.

Economists see similar silver linings elsewhere, making a replay of the global 2008 housing crash, which sent the world into recession, unlikely. Hot markets could cool naturally without wider damage as interest rates rise and pent-up demand is met.

As in the U.S., much of the buying globally is being driven by real demand rather than speculation, with families looking to upgrade to larger properties in suburban areas as they work more from home.

“There’s been this almost global reset as people have taken a step back during lockdown periods and reassessed their lifestyle,” said Kate Everett-Allen, head of international residential research at Knight Frank.

Strong home-price appreciation also makes homeowners feel wealthier and encourages more spending and construction, as developers build more supply.

However, with equities prices also at or near record highs, some officials are worried that vast amounts of stimulus are pushing asset prices to unsustainable levels in some global cities, which could lead to local market corrections.

The Dutch central bank told The Wall Street Journal that one concern is that sharp property price increases could be forcing households to take on excessive risk to finance home purchases. Prices in the Netherlands, where there is also a housing supply crunch, rose 7.8% last year, after a 6.9% rise in 2019, according to analysts at ING Groep.

Canada’s central bank governor, Tiff Macklem, said in February there were early signs of “excess exuberance” in the Canadian housing market, with prices up 17% on an adjusted basis over a one-year period, according to the Canadian Real Estate Association.

Mr. Macklem said officials would be monitoring the situation closely, but dismissed taking measures to rein in sales, saying the economy needed all the support it could get.

Governments say they are also worried about pricing more families out of the market, which could exacerbate economic imbalances that have worsened during the pandemic and potentially drive younger people to put off having children.

In Seoul, where house prices at one point last year were up nearly 15% on an annualized basis, some couples are postponing registering marriages in the hope of making it easier to buy homes. Income thresholds for low-interest mortgages in South Korea are more generous for individuals than couples.

In New Zealand, Sam Hindle, 29, says he and his wife bid on six houses and were rejected for all of them because of competition from other buyers, and eventually agreed to buy a house off-market from a friend.

“It’s just been a nightmare,” said Mr. Hindle, who works in a bank call center and lives about a four-hour drive from Auckland.

Government officials recently told New Zealand’s central bank that it must consider the impact its policy decisions have on housing, though doing so could complicate rate-setting. The central bank also restricted the volume of high-risk mortgages banks can offer.

Last year, China put new limits on developer financing in the hope of cooling housing prices, but the market has remained frothy. In early March, the chairman of China’s main banking regulator said he was worried about a possible correction in home prices, which could threaten banks’ stability.

Europe’s housing prices have kept climbing despite a much bleaker economic outlook than in the U.S. or China. In part that is because governments have kept supporting families with salary subsidies and moratoriums on loan repayments. It is also because interest rates remain extraordinarily low, with mortgage rates averaging 1.35% across the eurozone.

In Denmark, mortgage holders have been able to borrow money at negative interest, meaning borrowers only pay the bank an administration fee. Negative interest in their favor either gets discounted from the fee or deducted from their mortgage principal.

Michael Stausholm, a Copenhagen real-estate agent, said he has sold 45 homes in less than three months this year, putting him on track to beat last year’s record of 161 sales, despite Covid-19 restrictions.

“A lot of people want to put their money in brick,” Mr. Stausholm said.

Pre-pandemic, the Dutch central bank ruled that banks would need to hold more capital to cover potential losses in mortgage-loan portfolios, but implementation was postponed because of Covid-19. The central bank has also called for the government to gradually phase out tax incentives for homeowners, including mortgage-interest deductions.

Mick ten Bosch, a real-estate agency owner in Amsterdam, said he had 450 people trying to view one house last year, compared with an average of 20 pre-pandemic. This year is even busier, with houses selling for 15% to 20% above asking price, he added.

Teun Kraaij, a 34-year-old entrepreneur, bought a house in an area by the beach near Amsterdam with more space for his two children. While he had enough money to pay the full purchase price outright, his banker advised him to take a mortgage with a 1.2% interest rate.

“It’s so cheap to borrow money nowadays, it doesn’t make sense not to do it,” Mr. Kraaij said.

Updated: 4-12-2021

White House Warns Of Inflation Hitting Consumers Wallets/Purses

The White House said inflation is likely to settle back down after a temporary acceleration in the next few months, as the Biden administration seeks to address Republican criticism that its stimulus plans will overheat the economy.

Annual inflation is likely to rise in the coming months because of comparisons with year-earlier figures, supply-chain disruptions and pent-up demand for services, according to a blog post Monday by Jared Bernstein, a member of the Council of Economic Advisers, and Ernie Tedeschi, a senior CEA economist.

Price gains will “fade back to a lower pace thereafter as actual inflation begins to run more in line with longer-run expectations,” they wrote.

The blog post aims to give a more detailed explanation of why inflation pressures are likely to dissipate after top officials including Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen repeatedly said there’s no reason for any significant concern about prices. The White House outlook is in line with the views of Federal Reserve officials and the median of private forecasts collected by Bloomberg News.

“Such a transitory rise in inflation would be consistent with some prior episodes in American history coming out of a pandemic or when the labor market has quickly shifted, such as demobilization from wars,” Bernstein and Tedeschi wrote. “We will, however, carefully monitor both actual price changes and inflation expectations for any signs of unexpected price pressures that might arise as America leaves the pandemic behind and enters the next economic expansion.”

Some Republicans have attacked President Joe Biden’s $1.9 trillion coronavirus-relief bill passed last month and the proposed $2.25 trillion infrastructure and jobs plan as likely to boost inflation to undesirable levels, amid extra borrowing.

Larry Summers, a former Treasury Secretary and top Obama administration economic adviser, has also said that Biden risked triggering high inflation by pumping too much money into the economy just as it’s poised to pick up steam.

The White House said inflation is likely to settle back down after a temporary acceleration in the next few months, as the Biden administration seeks to address Republican criticism that its stimulus plans will overheat the economy.

Annual inflation is likely to rise in the coming months because of comparisons with year-earlier figures, supply-chain disruptions and pent-up demand for services, according to a blog post Monday by Jared Bernstein, a member of the Council of Economic Advisers, and Ernie Tedeschi, a senior CEA economist.

Price gains will “fade back to a lower pace thereafter as actual inflation begins to run more in line with longer-run expectations,” they wrote.

The blog post aims to give a more detailed explanation of why inflation pressures are likely to dissipate after top officials including Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen repeatedly said there’s no reason for any significant concern about prices. The White House outlook is in line with the views of Federal Reserve officials and the median of private forecasts collected by Bloomberg News.

“Such a transitory rise in inflation would be consistent with some prior episodes in American history coming out of a pandemic or when the labor market has quickly shifted, such as demobilization from wars,” Bernstein and Tedeschi wrote. “We will, however, carefully monitor both actual price changes and inflation expectations for any signs of unexpected price pressures that might arise as America leaves the pandemic behind and enters the next economic expansion.”

Some Republicans have attacked President Joe Biden’s $1.9 trillion coronavirus-relief bill passed last month and the proposed $2.25 trillion infrastructure and jobs plan as likely to boost inflation to undesirable levels, amid extra borrowing.

Larry Summers, a former Treasury Secretary and top Obama administration economic adviser, has also said that Biden risked triggering high inflation by pumping too much money into the economy just as it’s poised to pick up steam.

Raw Materials Prices Have Surged. Corporate Profits Are Likely Next

Higher input costs generally accompany broad economic growth, allowing companies to pass along added expenses and fatten margins.

Prices are surging for raw materials, leading to higher costs for companies from home builders to clothing makers.

If history repeats, that will be a boon to corporate bottom lines and investors as well.

Rising material costs usually foreshadow fatter profit margins, according to Jonathan Golub, chief U.S. equity strategist at Credit Suisse Group.

Higher input costs generally accompany broad economic growth, which allows companies to pass along added expenses through higher prices of their own. Also, fixed expenses, like factory equipment, can be spread over greater sales.

Mr. Golub tracked operating margins among companies included in the S&P 500 stock index and found rises and declines that mirror earlier moves in materials prices, for which he used an index of commodities that includes zinc, rubber, steel scrap and burlap.

Lately it has been hard to find a commodity not rising in price. Wheat, copper, wood pulp, crude oil and corn have all rebounded from the depths of last spring’s economic lockdowns.

Lumber prices have sailed more than 75% higher than the pre-pandemic record. High wood prices along with rising copper and crude oil bode especially well for corporate earnings, Mr. Golub said.

The producer-price index, a measure of the prices businesses receive for their goods and services, rose 1% in March, the Labor Department said Friday. Steel, iron, industrial chemicals, diesel and plastic resins were big gainers. The inflation measure ended March up 4.2% from a year earlier, the biggest 12-month gain in a decade.

Scott Colyer, chief executive of Advisors Asset Management, which manages $38 billion, said he believes commodity prices and in turn the price of manufactured goods have room to run, thanks to fiscal and monetary stimulus from governments aiming to soften the blow of pandemic lockdowns and revive their economies.

Meanwhile, scarcity of some materials and snarled supply lines have purchasing managers stockpiling the materials their companies need to do business, which adds more demand.

“There is a point where the system will not tolerate increases, but we’re not in one of those places today at all,” Mr. Colyer said. “Things are lined up where this should be a pretty good party.”

The frenzied pandemic housing market has allowed home builders and their suppliers, like Sherwin-Williams Co. and door maker Masonite International Corp. , to counteract rising costs with higher prices without losing customers. Consumer-product firms have followed suit.

Companies including Levi Strauss & Co., Corona brewer Constellation Brands Inc. and Conagra Brands Inc., the packaged-food company behind Vlasic pickles and Reddi-wip, have told investors they are pushing prices higher in response to more costly raw materials.

“History shows us that price adjustments are more likely to be accepted in the market when industrywide and broad-based input cost inflation occurs, and that’s the environment we see today,” Conagra finance chief David Marberger told investors last week.

With Economy Poised For Best Growth Since 1983, Inflation Lurks

Federal stimulus and Covid-19 vaccinations have led to boosts in outlook for GDP and consumer prices in survey of economists.

Ronald Reagan was in the White House, “Return of the Jedi” was in theaters, and economic growth hit an astonishing 7.9%.

The U.S. has produced many more Star Wars films since 1983, but growth has never approached that level—until this year, if economists are right. Those surveyed by The Wall Street Journal boosted their average forecast for 2021 economic growth to 6.4%, measured as the change in inflation-adjusted gross domestic product in the fourth quarter from a year earlier. If realized, that would be one of the few times in 70 years that the economy has grown so fast.

“We had an incredible shock, but look how fast we’re bouncing back,” said Allen Sinai, chief global economist and strategist at Decision Economics Inc. “We’re in the early stages of recovery, and we’ve got three to five years to go. I think we’re going to end up in a boom.”

Economists expect growth to slow to 3.2% next year, which would still make 2021-22 the strongest two-year performance since 2005.

That boom might have a potentially troubling side effect. Inflation, as measured by the consumer-price index, is expected to jump sharply from 1.7% in February when March data is released Tuesday. That is partly a quirk of the data, as outright declines in consumer prices recorded at the start of the pandemic in March of last year drop from the 12-month calculation.

Still, economists see further price pressures as the economy reopens, with inflation accelerating to 3% in June, which would be the highest since 2012, before slowing to 2.6% by December. They see the Federal Reserve starting to raise rates in mid-2023, rather than 2024 or later, as officials at the central bank have indicated.

The Wall Street Journal survey of 69 business, academic and financial forecasters was conducted April 5-7. Not all participants responded to every question.

As recently as December, economists expected solid but unspectacular growth of 3.7% this year, reflecting the reversal of pandemic-induced shutdowns as well as the Fed’s low interest rates. Then, in the waning months of the Trump administration, the federal government authorized two Covid-19 vaccines, and Congress passed a $900 billion coronavirus relief package.

About a third of Americans have now received at least one shot, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Congress has approved another $1.9 trillion in fiscal support. On March 31, President Biden unveiled an infrastructure investment plan to be partly financed by higher corporate taxes.

“Both in terms of magnitude and timing, that was a bigger jolt to the economy than anticipated,” said Michelle Meyer, head of U.S. economics at BofA Global Research, referring to fiscal stimulus. “Another very important factor is the vaccination campaign, which is happening faster than anticipated.”

Economists in the survey on average now expect employers to add 7.1 million jobs in 2021, which would be the largest December-to-December gain on record and up sharply from 4.9 million projected in the survey late last year. At 5%, the increase would be the largest since 1978. The unemployment rate is expected to fall to 4.8% by year-end, compared with a projection of 5.6% late last year.

The outlook remains highly uncertain. In the past year, economists have alternated between excessive optimism and pessimism. Vaccine hesitancy, faster-spreading virus variants or the potential drag from a lagging overseas economy could yet undercut growth this year.

Growth of 6% or better was more common before the 1980s, when underlying growth was higher and usually came right after recessions with the help of loose monetary and fiscal policy. The contraction in output in the first half of last year was far more severe than any previous recession, so a strong recovery was partly inevitable. Indeed, GDP rebounded strongly in the third quarter of last year.

The scale of federal stimulus is greater than in the previous recoveries, at nearly $6 trillion, or more than one-quarter of annual GDP. Mr. Reagan’s combination of tax cuts and military spending was spread out over a longer period, said Mr. Sinai. “It makes it hard for a forecaster because I’ve not seen anything like this, ever,” he said.

That stimulus has significantly boosted federal debt, which some warn could eventually raise interest rates sharply. Still, economists see the 10-year Treasury note yield rising only slowly from 1.66% on Friday to around 1.9% by the end of this year and 2.5% by the end of 2023, still lower than in 2018.

A hot economy could also bring the bugbear of inflation. Its path depends heavily on how easily surging demand can be met with increased production.

“How does it shake out? Well, no one knows because no one has seen such an experiment before—it’s like spending as much money to fight World War II except there’s no enemy, we’re not spending it on defense, and it’s not clear who will buy what,” said James F. Smith, macroeconomist at EconForecaster LLC. “If the overwhelming majority of our demand goes to domestically produced goods and services, we’re going to see bottlenecks like we’ve never seen before.” More likely, though, some of that U.S. demand will go toward goods and services from abroad, keeping prices in check, Mr. Smith said.

The Fed’s 2% inflation target is based on the price index of personal-consumption expenditures, which economists expect to advance from 1.6% in February to 2.5% by the fourth quarter, and remain above 2% through 2023. That is slightly higher than Fed officials themselves expect. The central bank has said it would start to raise rates when inflation reaches 2% and is headed higher and when full employment has been achieved.

This year’s unusually torrid projected growth might be powered not just by a return to pre-Covid-19 normalcy but also by technological, structural and policy changes that could boost growth potential beyond 2021, said Ms. Meyer.

“We went through so much pain as a society around Covid, and there were so many lives lost,” she said. “But in a way the economy was put into hibernation for a period of time, supported by stimulus.” In the intervening time, she added, firms invested in new technologies and rethought workforce management in ways that could boost productivity and labor-force participation. “The economy has now, in a sense, reset,” she said.

Updated: 5-6-2021

Investors Bet On Dollar’s Slow Downward Drift

Hedge funds, asset managers scoop up derivatives that pay off when the dollar declines slowly or stays in a narrow range.

Some investors are betting on a slow, steady grind downward for the U.S. dollar.

Hedge funds and asset managers are scooping up derivatives that pay off when the dollar declines slowly or stays within a narrow range. In one strategy, known as a strangle, traders sell both bullish and bearish options for short periods. They can collect a premium from selling the contracts and profit as long as the underlying currency remains steady and doesn’t trigger the options.

The bets on a calm retreat mark a shift after last year’s pandemic-heightened swings. Many expected the dollar to slide in 2021, as global growth outpaced the U.S. expansion. Instead the U.S.’s rapid vaccine rollout and economic resurgence have supported the currency, reducing volatility along with the opportunity for traders to make money off swings. The WSJ Dollar Index has gained roughly 1.4% this year.

Kristen Macleod, co-head of global foreign exchange sales at Barclays, said trade strategies that involve selling volatility stand out as a clear trend at a time when hedge funds and asset managers have a higher bar for betting in currency markets than earlier this year.

Hedge funds and other speculative investors have increased bets on a weaker dollar in recent weeks, though net short positions remain much less extreme than they were late last year, data from Scotiabank and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission data show.

“Foreign exchange has not been the trending market most clients were hoping for,” said Ms. Macleod. “Nobody is calling for the demise of the dollar as they were in the beginning of 2021, but we are starting to enter a phase where you can see the dollar dripping lower.”

When the pandemic hit in March last year, volatility shook currency markets. One metric that traders use to gauge currency swings—derivatives tied to Japanese yen—spiked to levels unseen even during the financial crisis in 2008. It has since retreated toward all-time lows. The yen, often a haven for nervous investors, has lost more than 5% against the dollar this year.

Mike Harvey, global head of electronic foreign exchange options trading at UBS Group, said higher U.S. interest rates, stock declines or a shift in the Federal Reserve’s easy money policies could boost swings in currencies. He doesn’t expect sustained volatility, however, until central bank policies around the world diverge more.

Some investors are starting to buy options betting on gains in the Canadian dollar, after the central bank accelerated its timetable for increasing interest rates and paring bond purchases, according to Ms. MacLeod. Speculators have increased bullish wagers on the Canadian dollar recently.

“I do think there is some hope for foreign exchange volatility given the global recovery and possibility for central bank policies to normalize,” said Mr. Harvey.

Updated: 5-16-2021

Biden Should Fight The Inflation The Fed Ignores

Rising prices for food and energy may not matter to economists, but they do to consumers.

Economists and regular people can never seem to agree about inflation. Looking at last week’s news that U.S. consumer prices rose an eye-popping 4.2% in April from a year ago, a central banker will say that the increase is a much more modest 3% once food and energy costs are stripped out. A normal person will say that doesn’t help very much when they’re trying to fill up the car on the way to the supermarket.

The good news is that the Federal Reserve is deliberately insulated from day-to-day politics. That means Chair Jay Powell can stay the course with his “average inflation targeting” framework, while President Joe Biden and members of Congress can move to address the price issues that are most concerning to regular people: those everyday items that are purchased frequently even if they don’t necessarily add up to a huge share of overall consumer spending.

It’s a healthy division of labor. Both kinds of inflation matter to different people and in different ways, and the central bank and elected government can complement each other’s work in helping Americans climb out of the pandemic economy.

Wisdom stems from recognizing how fundamentally odd the economists’ concept of inflation is.

The idea is to discount price movements in the food and energy sectors because they are prone to violent price swings, but also because these swings are often dominated by “real” rather than monetary factors. Chicken prices are up lately, for example, not because of money-printing but because Tyson Foods apparently made a bad bet on roosters that don’t perform.

The Fed rightly concentrates on slower-moving changes in big sectors of the economy such as housing, health care and durable goods. But that means it is often focused on prices that are rarely paid.

The cost of buying a used car surged 10% in April, for example, but in any given month few people buy a used car. The single biggest item in the core CPI, the index that made news last week, is the cost of housing.

This is calculated by looking at rents, and then imputing an equivalent rental price to the residents of owner-occupied housing. Since most Americans live in owner-occupied housing, this means the biggest component of the price index is a statistical construct that nobody pays.

To be clear, there’s a good reason for this. If you’re trying to steer the entire U.S. economy, you need to pay attention to what matters to it — and housing matters a lot. So do things like the price that Medicare pays to medical-service providers.

A person just living his life, by contrast, cares what he actually pays for stuff. I own my home so don’t care that so-called “shelter inflation” was mild. I have no intention of buying a new car, so I don’t really care that the price of used cars surged. But I buy food and gas every week, so I both notice and care.

Academic studies show that consumer perceptions of inflation tend to be dominated by frequent purchases, which are inconvenient to give up. I decided to put off getting a new fence for my backyard, for example, because lumber prices are soaring. But my family needs to eat every day.

This is the opportunity for Biden. Let Powell stay focused on the long-term health of the labor market. The president can show concern about the price of everyday goods.

Last week, that required addressing the gasoline shortages in the southeast U.S., which the president did in part by waiving some federal fuel blending requirements to keep supply on line. More broadly, Biden should make a bigger effort to frame his energy policy around the goal of cheapness.

Renewable energy and electric cars both cost more up front than fossil fuel and gasoline-powered cars, but they have cheaper long-term operating costs. Meanwhile, current interest rates are low. Biden’s program, by calling for replacing fossil fuels with capital-intensive renewables and batteries, essentially lets the U.S. use debt (which is cheap) to get energy (which is expensive) — a clear financial win even if you don’t care about pollution.

Biden should also look at unwinding the Trump-era U.S.-European tariff war on food products. A bigger issue is the need for agricultural labor.

As it happens, there is a bill that has already passed the House, the Farm Workforce Modernization Act, which would help keep food affordable — especially milk, which normally ranks second only to gasoline as a highly salient price. The bill, cosponsored by the newly powerful Representative Elise Stefanik, would create a pathway to regularize the status of undocumented farmworkers, expand the H-2A visa program and, crucially, make dairies eligible for temporary worker visas.

This is not an anti-inflation program as a central banker would understand it. Which is fine, because the central bank isn’t trying to fight inflation right now. But these are the prices that matter to people’s lives and to politicians’ futures, and there are good ways to keep them from rising too fast.

Updated: 6-3-2021

Inflation In Rich Countries Hit A 12-Year High In April

Jump in oil prices has led some to see echoes of the 1970s, but increase in supply suggests pressures will be temporary.

Consumer prices across the rich world rose at the fastest pace in more than 12 years during April, as central bankers try to figure out whether shortages that have emerged as the global economy reopens will prove transitory or have long-lasting consequences.

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Wednesday said consumer prices in its 36 members, which are mostly rich countries, were 3.3% higher than in April 2020. That was the largest increase since October 2008.

Across the Group of 20 leading economies, which account for about four-fifths of global economic activity, the annual rate of inflation rose to 3.8% from 3.1% in March, reaching its highest level in over a year.

The jump in some prices over recent months has unsettled investors used to a long period of sluggish inflation. In the U.S. those concerns have been compounded by the Biden administration’s fiscal stimulus package, which is unmatched in any other part of the world economy.

“Market worries surrounding high and accelerating inflation stem from the risk that pent-up demand, strong fiscal stimulus and the Fed’s commitment to keep policy rates on hold will cause overheating,” said Moody’s Investors Service in a note on the inflation outlook.

Much of the inflation recorded by the OECD in April came from what are known as base effects. The prices of many commodities fell sharply as large parts of the global economy were placed in suspended animation in April 2020, and so prices a year later seem higher than they are relative to the average over recent years.

In April, energy prices across the OECD’s members were 16.3% higher than a year earlier, compared with 7.4% in March. Those base effects will persist for a number of months as prices now are compared with very depressed levels a year earlier, but that effect will eventually fade.

Producers of oil and other commodities responded to the slump in demand during the early months of the pandemic by cutting back on their output. In a typical economic slowdown, it would have taken many months for demand to rebound. But during the pandemic households have adapted to working, educating their children and entertaining themselves from home by buying a range of durable goods, including electronic devices and furniture.

That mismatch between unexpectedly high demand and reduced supply has led to shortages of many of the things that factories need to make their products. Surveys of purchasing managers at factories around the world that were released Tuesday showed that activity rose at the fastest rate in 11 years during May, but the waiting times for delivery of needed supplies were the longest in the survey’s history.

Factories reported that the prices they paid for inputs rose at the fastest pace in over a decade, while the prices they charged rose at the fastest pace on record.

But there are signs that supplies of raw materials are starting to increase. Members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies, a group known as OPEC+, agreed Tuesday to a previously planned output increase of about 450,000 barrels a day, starting next month.

Saudi Arabia, meanwhile, agreed to continue easing separate, unilateral cuts of one million barrels a day that it put in place earlier this year.

In April, the group agreed to increase output by more than two million barrels a day by the end of July, bringing cumulative additions over the past year to some four million barrels a day. That is a big chunk of the 9.7 million barrels a day the group agreed to cut early in 2020.

The role that oil has played in the inflation pickup has triggered memories of the 1970s, when interruptions to the supply of that key commodity set off a series of other price rises that saw inflation jump to double-digit levels in many parts of the rich world.

Economists mostly think the risk of a repeat is very low, citing the many ways in which the global economy has changed over the past half-century. In the 1970s, strong labor unions secured pay rises that matched rising inflation, and businesses then raised their prices to maintain their profit margins, provoking a fresh round of wage demands.

“Many people are making the comparison with the 1970s, but the world is very different,” said Laurence Boone, the OECD’s chief economist. “We’re more open, we don’t have the same level of unionization and indexation, and the demographics are different.”

Updated: 6-11-2021

Which Higher Prices Are Here To Stay?

Prices are surging for many household expenses as the pandemic eases and the economy reopens.

Inflation is heating up across the economy as the ebbing of the pandemic unleashes pent-up consumer demand at a time of supply shortages. Overall consumer prices jumped 5% in May from a year earlier—the biggest increase since 2008, the Labor Department reported Thursday.

Some of these increases—such as for airfares, restaurants and women’s suits—reflect a return to normal, or pre-pandemic price levels, after prices collapsed last year due to business closures and restrictions and consumers’ fear of traveling and getting infected. Some—such as car and truck prices—are due to shortages of specific components or materials. Such jumps are likely to prove temporary and unlikely to lead to persistent increases for years to come.

Other price rises, however, could reflect more lasting changes in workers’ and consumers’ behavior over the past year. Here are some examples of May price increases hitting consumer pocketbooks directly.

Returning To Normal

Restaurants: Prices for meals at full-service establishments rose 0.6% in May from the month before, and were up 4% from a year earlier. Meanwhile, grocery prices are rising more slowly this year than during 2020, when people shifted to eating Price pressures may continue to build in coming months as people venture out more. The average number of seated diners tracked on the restaurant reservation platform OpenTable was down in the first week of June just 9% from 2019 levels. That is better than the figures for the first week of May, when they were down 21% from two years earlier.

Travel: Americans’ yen for travel after spending a year cooped up is another big cause of the pickup in overall prices. The volume of travelers passing through TSA airport checkpoints has recovered to nearly 75% of 2019 levels, versus about 40% at the beginning of the year. The rush to return to the skies drove airfares up 24.1% in May from a year before, while hotel and motel prices rose by 9% over the same period, the most on record.

While these increases are dramatic, they are not necessarily a sign of lasting price pressures. Prices for both services plummeted during the pandemic thanks to lockdowns, travel restrictions, telecommuting and fear of the virus. Airfares are still down 12% from February 2020 levels, while prices for hotels and motels are off by 4.6%.

Apparel: Prices for women’s suits and dresses plummeted last year as the pandemic canceled social events and people shifted to working from home. In May, however, those prices rose from a year earlier for the first time since the Covid-19 crisis began, as more women left the house. The decline in prices for men’s suits slowed sharply last month as well.

Supply Shortages

Vehicles: One-third of the monthly increase in CPI in May came from a jump in prices for used cars and trucks. A global shortage in semiconductor chips exacerbated by the pandemic has held back production, leaving dealership inventories lean. That shortage in new cars has tightened the supply of used cars as owners hold on to their vehicles longer—which, in turn, sent the prices of used cars and trucks soaring 29.7% in May, versus a year ago.

The new-car shortage also is making it hard for rental car companies to restock their fleets after selling off many of their vehicles last year when travel collapsed. Now, demand is far outstripping the already limited supply of rental vehicles, sending prices soaring nearly 110% higher in May than they were a year earlier.

Jeffrey Stark, 28, of Arlington, Va., wants to travel more now that businesses are opening back up, but he is finding that high prices and scarcity of goods and services are curtailing his ambitions. He is flying to Utah next week for a family event, and had initially planned to tack on a few extra days to explore on his own—only to scrap those plans when he couldn’t find a car to rent.

“My travel this year seems like it’s going to be largely limited to visiting people rather than places because I’m seeing reports of completely booked hotels and, especially, no available rental cars,” said Mr. Stark, a geographic information systems analyst for the postal service.

Still Strong Spending From Home

Furniture, appliances and other home goods: These prices rose sharply during the pandemic and are continuing to climb as people still spend more time at home than before the pandemic. Prices for living room, kitchen and dining room furniture rose 9.8% in May from a year earlier, while prices for bedroom furniture, appliances and indoor plants and flowers rose sharply too.

When Americans Took To The Streets Over Inflation

In the 1960s and 1970s, spiraling prices for staples like meat and gasoline wreaked havoc on the U.S. economy, thanks to political and policy mistakes that offer a warning for today.

In the fall of 1966, a wave of protests swept the U.S., capturing the attention of Washington politicians, big business leaders and newsroom headline writers. But these Americans weren’t voicing their anger over the war in Vietnam or racial discrimination.

The protests were against rising grocery prices, and the foot soldiers in what was described as a “housewife revolt” were largely middle-class women with children. Fed up with the increasing cost of living, they marched outside of supermarkets with placards demanding lower prices, sometimes printed in lipstick.

The picketing started in Denver and swept to other cities, prompting Time magazine to report that supermarket boycotts were spreading “like butter on a sizzling griddle.” President Lyndon Johnson’s special assistant on consumer affairs egged them on, urging protesters to “vote with the dollar.”

Marches and boycotts over food costs would crop up time and again over the next decade, aimed at the prices of coffee, meat and other products. They became a part of the social landscape, like suburban gasoline lines that stretched for blocks and union pickets for cost-of-living pay increases. One local women’s group, the FLP (“For Lower Prices”) of Long Island, New York, had an estimated membership of 1,500, according to “Politics of the Pantry,” a book by historian Emily Twarog that documents some of the protests.

Today, after decades of nearly invisible inflation in the U.S., many Americans have little idea what it looks like. Nearly half of the U.S. population was born after 1981, the last year of double-digit consumer price increases. But America’s long inflation holiday shows signs of ending. Consumer prices are now rising again: The Labor Department’s consumer price index rose 5% in May from a year earlier, the biggest increase in more than a decade. History provides some useful lessons.

The nagging inflation of the late 1960s and 1970s didn’t happen overnight. It took root over years, building through a cascade of policy missteps and misfortunes until it became embedded in the psychology of nearly every American. It would take two deep recessions and new ways of thinking about economics to tame the inflation of that period.

Today’s pickup in consumer prices may not lead to a similar long-term inflation problem. But it might take some political courage from the nation’s central bank and other policy makers to make sure it doesn’t. Preventing the spread of inflation could also involve some economic pain.

“The problem is when policy makers are too slow to respond to their mistakes,” said Stephen Cecchetti, a Brandeis University economics professor who worked in the White House Council of Economic Advisers in 1979-80. His job was to redesign inflation measures that didn’t properly capture how housing costs were changing.

Inflation had happened before, mostly in wartime. Government spending ramped up to support the fighting. With a surfeit of money flowing into banks, businesses and households, and fewer goods to purchase due to production shortages, prices went up. When war efforts and the spending to fund them receded, inflation subsided.

In May 1917, just after the U.S. entered World War I, the Labor Department’s consumer-price index rose 20% from a year earlier. After the war ended, it stabilized during the roaring 1920s. Similarly, the index rose 13% in 1942, after the U.S. entered World War II, stabilized with government-imposed price controls, then surged 20% in 1947. The index fell in 1949 and then mostly stabilized during the 1950s, with the exception of the Korean War.

The mid-1960s started out looking like the old pattern. Consumer prices started rising as President Johnson sought to fund the Vietnam War and his Great Society social programs. But as the war ground on, so did creeping inflation. “They didn’t do anything about it,” Mr. Cecchetti said.

When Richard Nixon entered the White House in 1969, the annual inflation rate had already risen to 5%, from less than 2% during the Kennedy administration. What followed was more than a decade of mismanagement by Republicans, Democrats and a supporting cast at the Federal Reserve, a critical institution that was supposed to be apolitical.

President Nixon tried to manage the problem by fiat. When meat prices soared in 1973, some likened the ensuing consumer boycott to the Boston Tea Party. The administration imposed price caps on meat for a second time, and the Treasury Secretary, George Shultz, urged housewives to try “shopping wisely.” It didn’t work. Meat prices increased by 37% in 1973, 22% in 1975, 24% in 1978 and 27% in 1979.

“I thought a voluntary restraint program could work,” says Barry Bosworth, a Brookings Institution senior fellow who served as director of Jimmy Carter’s Council on Wage and Price Stability from 1977 to August 1979. “I have to admit it was just a complete failure.”

Beneath the surface, a more powerful economic force was exerting itself at the Fed, which controls the nation’s supply of money. When the central bank pumps money into the financial system, two things tend to happen. First, the cost of borrowing—the interest rate—goes down, because banks have a lot of money and are prepared to lend it out cheap. Second, the purchasing power of that money declines.

Imagine an economy where people do nothing but produce and consume oranges; each person, on average, makes one dollar a day and purchases one orange a day. On a typical day, the orange will cost around one dollar. If you hold orange production and consumption steady but put an extra dollar in everyone’s bank account, the only thing that will change is that people will bid up the price of oranges. The purchasing power of a single dollar drops as you increase its supply. That’s inflation.

President Johnson and then President Nixon badgered the Fed to keep pumping money into the economy and pushing interest rates lower, thinking it would drive unemployment down and help their economic programs and electoral prospects. The Fed often complied, but the main effect was to drive prices higher.

In 1971, for example, the annual inflation rate was still over 4%. Though it showed signs of slowing, the supply of money in household bank accounts and bank lending was still growing rapidly. The Fed raised interest rates early in the year but then abruptly reversed course and started cutting them late in the summer.

Reelection was on President Nixon’s mind, and he was close with Fed chair Arthur Burns. “I would never bring this beyond this room: My view is that I would rather have it move a little bit slower now, so that it can go up and get a real big verve later,” Mr. Nixon told Mr. Burns about his desire for economic growth in one taped conversation in March 1971.

After the meeting, Burns wrote that his friendship with Nixon was one of the three most important in his life and he wanted to keep it that way. He also wrote that he wanted the president to know “there was never the slightest conflict between my doing what was right for the economy and my doing what served the political interests of RN.”

Before the rate cuts that year, Nixon’s lieutenants threatened Burns by planting stories in newspapers that the president was considering stacking the central bank with White House supporters and also falsely accusing Mr. Burns of seeking a pay raise.

In addition to the threats, they tried to win him over with gifts, like sunglasses and a jacket from Camp David.

“He really played Burns like a yo-yo,” said Jeffrey Garten, a trade official in the Clinton administration whose forthcoming book, “Three Days at Camp David,” deals with Mr. Nixon’s decision that year to let the value of the dollar float in global markets, another move that helped to propel inflation.

The value of a dollar relative to other global currencies had been fixed to the price of gold after World War II. This meant other central banks could come to the Federal Reserve and exchange their growing dollar reserves—built up through their gains in trade—for gold at a fixed price. But U.S. gold reserves were dwindling as trade surpluses disappeared and dollars went overseas.

Fearing the U.S. would run out of gold, Mr. Nixon severed the link that August, sending the dollar’s exchange rate tumbling.

As a result, the price of imported goods doubled over the next four years. Moreover, because global trade in many goods was priced in dollars, exporters of commodities like oil also were under pressure. In October 1973, members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC, squeezed supplies in an oil embargo targeting the West.

It was intended to punish countries that supported Israel but also had the economic aim of pushing up the price of oil as its value in dollars fell.

Unrelenting inflation sent the U.S. economy into a game of leapfrog. Workers demanded pay increases to keep up with the rising cost of living. Many of them got raises through cost of living adjustments in union contracts. To keep up with rising costs, in turn, businesses raised prices even more. Thus grew a relatively new concept in the economic lexicon, the “wage-price spiral.

Economic relationships fell out of their old patterns. Some economists had thought that when unemployment rose, inflation would fall. Instead, both went up, giving rise to yet another new term, “stagflation.”

Complicating matters, worker productivity slowed inexplicably, making it harder for the Fed to read where the economy would go next. A flood of women into the labor force also made it harder to decipher a stable rate of unemployment. “Technical errors were levered into a disaster,” said Athanasios Orphanides, a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management, who started his career as an economist at the Fed studying what it did wrong in the 1970s.

By 1979 Arthur Burns was out at the Fed. He would shock an audience of leading bankers in Belgrade that year with a speech called “The Anguish of Central Banking,” in which he effectively declared defeat. “It is illusory to expect central banks to put an end to the inflation that now afflicts the industrial economies,” he said. The problem wasn’t that they were incapable of doing it, but that politics made it impossible to achieve the goal.

Households had also become almost inured to it. “People have learned to cope with inflation,” one supermarket executive told The Wall Street Journal in 1978. “They have come to accept price increases with less antagonism.” For millions of people, prices rose faster than wages, leaving them worse off even though their pay was going up.

A new leader at the Fed, Paul Volcker, was in the audience for Mr. Burns’s 1979 speech. Tall as a basketball player, with giant hands and a gravelly voice, Volcker left the Belgrade meeting with other ideas in mind. The following week, he engineered a dramatic increase in interest rates that would become known as the Saturday Night Massacre.

Volcker’s fight against inflation included restricting the growth of the money supply, leading to sharply higher interest rates that helped to end the presidency of the man who appointed him, Jimmy Carter.

Much of the way that today’s economists think about inflation was shaped by these events. Central bank independence and an official low inflation target became lodestars for central bankers around the world, including the Fed. Economists also came to understand the important role that psychology plays in the monetary affairs of a nation.

If consumers, workers and businesses come to believe that inflation will worsen, they will bid up prices and wages in anticipation, fueling the very inflation they loathe. Central bankers now monitor inflation expectations in surveys and financial markets for evidence their credibility is intact.

Inflation episodes after World War I and World War II showed shocks sometimes hit an economy, spurring a temporary spurt in prices, but then businesses and households get back to a normal way of operating. Long-term inflation sets in when policy makers, especially central bankers, lose the will to stop it with restrictive credit policies that come with a short-term cost in job losses or recession.

The economy is much different now from what it was in the 1970s. The dollar floats freely and isn’t fixed to the cost of gold.

That diminishes the risk of an abrupt collapse in its value with international repercussions. Adjustments happen tick by tick on traders’ computer screens almost every minute of every day.

Rising global competition has left today’s workers with less bargaining power, making it harder for them to demand wage increases in response to inflation. In 1976, six million unionized workers had automatic cost of living adjustments in their contracts. By 1995, the number had dropped to 1.2 million, and such agreements are now rare. Workers thus bear the brunt of inflation, but wage-price spirals seem less threatening.

In recent years, the memory of inflation in the 1970s has worried American policy makers less than the specter of Japan’s slow growth and low inflation in the 2000s. Inflation has run below the Fed’s 2% target consistently since 2008-09, prompting Fed officials to conclude that what the economy really needed was stimulus. Stagnation has been their focus, not stagflation, which is why they have worked so assiduously to keep interest rates low.

Fed officials say recent consumer price increases are transitory, tied to the Covid-19 crisis. Measures of inflation expectations are steady. Mr. Bosworth said he suspects policy makers will ultimately conclude they pumped too much money into the economy in response to the pandemic. Will we see Americans in the streets again protesting out-of-control prices? Not if policy makers heed the lessons of the past.

Updated: 6-13-2021

Summers Surprised By Bond Yields Falling Even As Inflation Jumps

Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers said he didn’t expect the recent fall in bond yields although he maintained his view that the economy is overheating.

“I didn’t anticipate the kind of decline in nominal yields that we’ve seen,” Summers told “Wall Street Week” with David Westin on Bloomberg Television. “I’m surprised. I would have expected that yields would have risen more.”

The yield on the key 10-year Treasury note fell to a three-month low of 1.43% on Thursday even after the government reported the consumer price index surged 5% in May from the previous year, the most since 2008. It ended Friday at 1.45%. Borrowing costs typically rise when inflation fears mount.

Summers, a paid contributor to Bloomberg, said the cheaper yields likely reflected a mixture of factors including bets the Federal Reserve is focused more on reducing unemployment than inflation, and that money is flowing into U.S. markets from abroad.

“People think the Fed is just about the unemployment, not about the inflationary pressure so they take down their views about interest rates,” he said.

Still, he predicted CPI would end the year advancing more than 4% on an annual basis. Faster inflation also meant so-called real interest rates had fallen even as the economy surged, he said.

“Monetary policy has been getting steadily easier through this year even as the economy’s booming,” Summers said. “That defies good sense.”

While some economists, including many officials at the Fed, argue the recent price pressures are driven by short-term factors such as the reopening of the economy, Summers repeated he is worried by overheating.

He noted rapid expansion in the economy and consumer demand, reports of labor shortages, a housing market that’s “on fire” and the warnings of company purchasing managers as reasons to worry.

“It’s going to lead to problems and the sooner we recognize that, the better it will be,” he said.

Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,Dollar On Course For,

Related Articles:

The Lure of Fed. Money-Printing And Artificially-Low Interest Rates (#GotBitcoin?)

Biden, Obama Release Campaign Video Applauding Their Achievements

Small Businesses Brace For Prolonged Crisis, Short On Cash And Customers (#GotBitcoin?)

Ultimate Resource For Violations of The U.S. Constitution Including “Money” And Coronavirus

Trump Campaign Forced To Use Tele-Rallies As Coronavirus Cases Surge

Roger Stone Uses Racial Slur In Live Radio Interview With Black Host

The Fed Is Setting The Stage For Hyper-Inflation Of The Dollar (#GotBitcoin?)

The Next Phase Of The Retail Apocalypse: Stores Reborn As E-Commerce Warehouses

Famous Economist Mohamed El-Erian Warns Investors To Stay Away From Zombie Companies And Zombie Markets

Republicans Alarmed By Democratic Senate Hopefuls’ Fundraising Haul

American Airlines Plans To Furlough Up To 25,000 Workers This Fall (#GotBitcoin?)

Consumer Appetite For Cars, Homes Bolsters U.S. Economy

Banks Get Ready For Wave of Recession-Led Loan Defaults (#GotBitcoin?)

32% of U.S. Households Missed Their July Housing Payments

What You Need To Know About The New Small-Business Bankruptcy Laws

Police Wrestle With Surge In Crime In U.S. Cities Amid Defunding Efforts

Here’s An Investment That Perfectly Tracks The Economy

Fed, Treasury Disagreements Slowed Start of Main Street Lending Program

When A Texas Oil Boom Goes Busts

Trump Takes Cognitive Test And Can Identify A Rhino vs A Camel

Don’t Know How Much Stimulus Is Needed? Put It On Autopilot, Some Say

Colorado Police Chief Fires Three Officers Over Reenacted Chokehold Placed On Elijah Mcclain

Republicans Give Trump Labor Day Deadline To Turn Things Around. After That, He’s On His Own

Chapter 11 Business Bankruptcies Rose 26% In First Half of 2020

Chaotic Trump Administration Plus Russian Bounty Intelligence Equals Loss Of American Lives

Supreme Court Orders Restructuring of Consumer-Finance Watchdog

Reddit, Acting Against Hate Speech, Bans ‘The_Donald’ Subreddit

Class Action Lawsuit Alleges Visa Subsidiary Violated Privacy And Data Protections Of Venmo, Stripe, Square’s Cash App, Robinhood & More

Private Equity’s Trillion-Dollar Piggy Bank Holds Little For Struggling Companies (#GotBitcoin?)

TikTok Teens Overload Trump’s Online Store With Orders Only To Abandon Shopping Cart

Bill Gates Says Trump’s Lack Of Leadership Is Making Pandemic Picture ‘More Bleak Than I Would Have Expected’

Fed Stress Test Finds U.S. Banks Not Healthy Enough To Withstand “Few Quarters” Economic Downturn

Elizabeth Warren Was Right About Whacky Stockmarket Fundamentals (#GotBitcoin?)

Two Of The Latest High-Profile Trump Resignations

US Banks Have Seen A Record $2 Trillion Surge Of Deposits Since The Coronavirus Crisis Began

Trump Gets KPOP’d And Tic Toc’d As Teens Mobilized To Derail Trump’s Tulsa Rally

The Dangerous Secrets Our Working-From-Home Photos Reveal

New Decentralized Cybersecurity Solution Enables Passwordless Logins (#GotBitcoin?)

CIA’s ‘Lax’ Security Led To Massive Theft of Hacking Tools, Internal Report Finds

Signal Is A Truly Private Chat App Ideal For Protestors (#GotBitcoin?)

Maintain Your Privacy And Security During A Protest (#GotBitcoin?)

Borrower, Beware: Credit-Card Fraud Attempts Rise During The Coronavirus Crisis

Senate Vote Allows FBI Access To Your Browsing History Without A Warrant And What You Can Do About It

Report Says Chinese And Iranian Hackers Seek To Steal Coronavirus Research

28,000 GoDaddy Hosting Accounts Compromised

Some States Dabble In Online Voting, Weighing Pandemic Against Cybersecurity Concerns

Antonopoulos: Chainalysis Is Helping World’s Worst Dictators & Regimes (#GotBitcoin?)

Survey Shows Many BTC Holders Use Hardware Wallet, Have Backup Keys (#GotBitcoin?)

Blockfolio Quietly Patches Years-Old Security Hole That Exposed Source Code (#GotBitcoin?)

Apple iPhone May Be Vulnerable To Email (Mail) Hack

Gates Foundation, WHO And Wuhan Institute of Virology All Hacked!

Google Hack Requires That You Updated Chrome Browser Now To Version: 81.0.4044.113

Privacy-Oriented Browsers Gain Traction (#GotBitcoin?)

Can Blockchain Technology Counter US Anti-Message Encryption Bill? (#GotBitcoin?)

Chinese Military Turns To U.S. University To Conduct Covert Research

CIA Has Had Keys To Global Communication Encryption Since WWII

Hostile Spies Target U.S. With Cyber, Encryption, Big Data, Report Finds

Hackers Stole And Encrypted Data of 5 U.S. Law Firms, Demand 2 Crypto Ransoms

Ex-CIA Engineer Goes On Trial For Massive Leak

Multi One Password (Portable App)

After He Fell For A $40K Phone Scam, His Bank Offered To Help—If He Stayed Quiet (#GotBitcoin?)

Your PGP Key? Make Sure It’s Up To Date

Bezos’ Phone Allegedly Hacked By Account Associated With Crown Prince

Major Companies Shared Vulnerability Used In Travelex Cyberattack (#GotBitcoin?)

Microsoft Releases Patch To Patch Windows Flaw Detected By NSA

VPN Tier List 2020 (Comparison Table)

SEC Market-Surveillance Project Hits Snag Over Hacker Fears

Inside China’s Major US Corporate Hack

Twitter Bug Exposed Millions of User Phone Numbers

U.S. Cyber Officials Give Holiday Shopping Advice For Consumers

Is Cayla The Toy Doll A Domestic Spy?

Google’s “Project Nightingale” Faces Government Inquiry Over Patient Privacy.

Which Password Managers Have Been Hacked?

DNS Over HTTPS Increases User Privacy And Security By Preventing Eavesdropping And Manipulation

Russia Steps Up Efforts To Shield Its Hackers From Extradition To U.S.

Barr Revives Debate Over ‘Warrant-Proof’ Encryption (#GotBitcoin?)

Should Consumers Be Able To Sell Their Own Personal Data?

Doordash Says Security Breach Affected Millions Of People (#GotBitcoin?)

Fraudsters Used AI To Mimic CEO’s Voice In Unusual Cybercrime Case (#GotBitcoin?)

Pearson Hack Exposed Details on Thousands of U.S. Students (#GotBitcoin?)

Cyber Hack Got Access To Over 700,000 IRS Accounts (#GotBitcoin?)

Take A Road Trip With Hotel Hackers (#GotBitcoin?)

Hackers Prove The Insecurity Of Trump’s Border Security By Stealing Photos Of Travelers’ Faces (#GotBitcoin?)

Hackers Target Loyalty Rewards Programs (#GotBitcoin?)

Taxpayer Money Finances IRS “Star Trek” Parody (#GotBitcoin?)

IRS Fails To Prevent $1.6 Billion In Tax Identity Theft (#GotBitcoin?)

IRS Workers Who Failed To Pay Taxes Got Bonuses (#GotBitcoin?)

Trump DOJ Declines To Charge Lois Lerner In IRS Scandal (#GotBitcoin?)

DMV Hacked! Your Personal Records Are Now Being Transmitted To Croatia (#GotBitcoin?)

Poor Cyber Practices Plague The Pentagon (#GotBitcoin?)

Tensions Flare As Hackers Root Out Flaws In Voting Machines (#GotBitcoin?)

3-29-2019 FBI Retools To Counter Cyber Threats, 4-12-2019 Thousands Of FBI Personal Data Is Stolen (#GotBitcoin?)

Overseas Traders Face Charges For Hacking SEC’s Public Filings Site (#GotBitcoin?)

Group Hacks FBI Websites, Posts Personal Info On Agents. Trump Can’t Protect You! (#GotBitcoin?)

SEC Hack Proves Bitcoin Has Better Data Security (#GotBitcoin?)

Hackers Prove The Insecurity Of Trump’s Border Security By Stealing Photos Of Travelers’ Faces (#GotBitcoin?)

Our Facebook Page

Your Questions And Comments Are Greatly Appreciated.

Monty H. & Carolyn A.

Go back

Leave a Reply