SALES, RENTALS & LAYAWAYS

PROTECTING EVERYTHING THAT HAS EVER BEEN OF VALUE TO YOU

Open 24/7/365

We Have A Life-Time Warranty /
Guarantee On All Products. (Includes Parts And Labor)

Here Is A List Of Companies That Have Suspended Dividends Or Stopped Stock Buybacks In April

After dozens of companies suspended or cut their dividends in recent weeks amid the coronavirus-driven business slowdown, some analysts believe dozens more are vulnerable across a variety of sectors. Here Is A List Of Companies That Have Suspended Dividends Or Stopped Stock Buybacks In April

Take Banks: After suspending stock buybacks in mid-March, eight big U.S. financial firms, including Bank of America (ticker: BAC) and JPMorgan Chase (JPM), appeared as though they could emerge from the coronavirus crisis with their dividends intact. After European and U.K. banks suspended their dividends on regulators’ urging, however, investors began sell U.S. bank shares amid concerns that a similar request could be made by federal regulators. (So far, though, analysts think U.S. banks should be able to maintain their payouts.)

What’s more, the recently passed $2 trillion coronavirus relief act requires companies that accept federal aid to suspend buybacks, dividends, or other capital distributions until 12 months after the loan is repaid in full.

Here Is A Running List Of Companies That Have Cut Or Suspended Their Dividend Payments Or Stock-Buyback Programs In April, As Well As Related News:

April 6

• Genuine Parts (GPC) said it is suspending share repurchases but said it has the “liquidity to operate through these uncertain times as well as continue to pay the dividend.”

April 3

• The European Union’s insurance regulator has asked insurers and reinsurers in the region to temporarily suspend dividends and consider a postponement of bonuses amid the coronavirus pandemic.

• Herman Miller (MLHR) postponed payment of its quarterly dividend that was to be paid April 15, saying instead that it intends to pay to the original shareholders of record when the board decides at a later date. Future dividends were suspended. The furniture maker also said it suspending certain employer-paid retirement contributions, among other cost-saving measures.

April 2

• Dave & Buster’s Entertainment (PLAY) suspended dividends and share buybacks, among a number of other measures, to conserve cash as its arcade-themed restaurants are closed.

• Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY) indefinitely postponed its dividend and plans for share repurchases, among other measures to conserve cash.

• Brinker International (EAT) suspended its quarterly dividend and share buybacks, among other steps as its Chili’s and Maggiano’s restaurants operate for takeaway dining only.

April 1

• Texas-based utility CenterPoint Energy (ticker: CNP) said it would make a “targeted reduction” in the quarterly dividend of its common stock to 15 cents a share from 29 cents.

• Vail Resorts (MTN) said it will cut its quarterly cash dividend for the next two quarters, though it will continue to pay its dividend on April 9.

Updated: 4-28-2020

Companies Are Suspending Dividends At Fastest Pace In Years

Moves add up to savings of about $23 billion so far, according to S&P Dow Jones Indices.

General Motors Co. suspended its dividend earlier this week, part of a raft of moves to keep the company afloat in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic. It is far from alone.

More companies have suspended or canceled their dividends so far this year than in the previous 10 years combined, with companies scrambling to preserve cash as the coronavirus pandemic saps revenue.

Through Tuesday, 83 U.S. companies and public investment funds, like real-estate investment trusts, have suspended or canceled their dividends, the highest number in data going back to 2001, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence. In the previous 10 years, 55 companies eliminated their dividends—payouts that companies make to shareholders as a reward for standing by them.

“You would be hard-pressed to find a better time to cut dividends and get forgiveness from investors,” said David Lafferty, chief market strategist at Natixis Investment Managers. “We’re going to see a massive pullback” among companies attempting to hoard capital or bowing to political pressure.

GM and rival Ford Motor Co., which also suspended its dividend last month, are attempting to ride out a multiweek shutdown of the auto industry that has led to a collapse in vehicle demand. Other companies such as Delta Air Lines Inc., Carnival Corp., Boeing Co. and Macy’s Inc. paused their dividends when global travel stalled and retailers temporarily closed their doors to slow the spread of the virus.

An additional 142 companies have reduced their payouts to shareholders in 2020, on pace for the worst year since 2009 when there were 316 such cuts. All the dividend actions so far add up to savings of about $23 billion, according to S&P Dow Jones Indices.

Overall, dividend payouts will fall about 10% this year, Bank of America predicts, with the biggest cuts coming from companies in the energy and consumer discretionary sectors. Last year set a record for dividend payouts at $491 billion.

In the short term, investors haven’t punished companies for suspending their dividends. Shares of GM, Boeing, Carnival and Delta all rose in the trading session after they announced the moves—a sign that investors are ignoring the usual dour implications of such cuts at a time when companies across industries need to conserve cash.

“If the dividend suspension makes sense, I’d be OK with it,” said Don Kilbride, senior managing director at Wellington Management and portfolio manager of the Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund. “A period of weaker dividend growth given the environment should not bother you.”

The recent stock-market rout has made dividends an even more crucial source of income for investors. With the market in turmoil and central banks pushing down rates on government debt, the yields on dividend-paying stocks and funds have become more attractive. The S&P 500 is down 11.4% this year.

The collapse in prices has translated into a surge in yields—the ratio of the dividend payout divided by stock price. The S&P 500’s dividend yield has risen to 2.06% from 1.73% at the start of the year. It climbed as high as 2.56% on March 23 when stocks hit their recent lows, marking the highest level since August 2009.

In comparison, the yield on the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note is 0.61%. The spread between the two yields on March 23 was the widest on record in data going back to 1999, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

“Dividends versus fixed alternatives look more attractive,” Mr. Lafferty said. But that on its own doesn’t offset the risk that a company will cut or suspend its payout, he cautioned.

The surge in yields has been even more dramatic for some beaten-down stocks. Exxon Mobil Corp. shares, for instance, have fallen 36% year-to-date, pushing the yield up to 7.7% from 4.99% at the start of the year. Chevron Corp. is down 25% this year; that has pushed its yield up to 5.7% from 3.95%.

Rising yields are good for investors, but the subtext is critical. If the yield is rising because of a falling stock price or problems at the company, it may not be sustainable. Both Exxon and Chevron have outlined plans to slow other spending during the pandemic, partly to preserve their ability to maintain their dividends.

Almost as important as the income stream itself, dividends are a way for companies to send a signal to investors, which is a big reason why they are loath to cut them, said Simeon Hyman, the chief strategist at asset manager ProShares, which sells dozens of exchange-traded funds.

“If you increase your dividend, you are pounding the table that you have confidence,” he said, mentioning recent increases from both Johnson & Johnson and Procter & Gamble Co. “If you’re cutting, you are capitulating. You are saying times are going to be bad for a little while.”

All four companies are known as dividend aristocrats, firms that have increased their shareholder payouts every year for at least 25 years. S&P has an index that tracks 64 companies in its benchmark index that meet the criteria.

There are a number of ETFs that, in turn, track the dividend aristocrats. Some companies are hesitant to cut their payouts because they don’t want to be removed from such funds.

One of the most high-profile is the ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF. The ETF is down 15% on the year, underperforming the S&P 500. But the drop has nudged up the fund’s yield to 2.4% from 2.3% at the end of 2019.

“Some of these funds, in fact, could shield investors from a collapse in dividends,” Mr. Hyman said.

That isn’t only because investors are buying long-term, quality companies, he said, they are also shielded from the direct impact of dividend cuts.

If a dividend aristocrat cuts its payout, it is dropped from S&P’s index and subsequently the ETFs that track it. But at least for the ProShares fund, the shares are sold and the proceeds are reinvested in the remaining companies. The result could be that the fund’s yield actually goes up, not down, he said.

Updated: 10-1-2020

Fed Caps Big Banks’ Dividends, Halts Share Buybacks In Fourth Quarter

Central bank extends restrictions on dividends, buybacks, amid cloudy economic outlook.

The biggest U.S. banks will face restrictions on dividends and share buybacks for another three months, the Federal Reserve said Wednesday, citing the need to conserve capital during the coronavirus-induced downturn.

The Fed said it would maintain prohibitions on share buybacks and a cap on dividend payments by 33 banks with more than $100 billion in assets until the end of year. The restrictions, imposed for the third quarter, were due to expire Wednesday.

The action is intended to “ensure that large banks maintain a high level of capital resilience,” the central bank said in a statement. “The capital positions of large banks have remained strong during the third quarter while such restrictions were in place.”

In another sign of the uncertainty facing the industry and the broader economy, the Fed has required big banks to undergo a second round of so-called stress tests later this year, based on two coronavirus-related recession scenarios. Results of the tests, designed to ensure banks can continue to lend in a crisis, will be announced by the end of the year.

Banks are in a much stronger position now than they were during the financial crisis of 2008. But an analysis the Fed conducted this summer found that if the economy takes a long time to recover, banks could experience losses on a similar scale. It said at the time that limiting shareholder payouts would help keep banks healthy during the recession.

The biggest U.S. banks, including Bank of America Corp. and JPMorgan Chase & Co., had already voluntarily halted share buybacks through the second quarter. Buybacks are the main way U.S. banks return capital to shareholders. Under the dividend restrictions, banks won’t be able to make payouts that are greater than their average quarterly profit from the four most recent quarters.

The Fed’s restrictions come as many bank shares have plunged as the coronavirus pandemic took a toll on banks’ bread-and-butter lending businesses. Short-term interest rates near zero and tens of billions of dollars set aside to cover bad loans have cut into profits, outweighing gains in trading.

Bank executives “are biting their tongues with the Fed, with fingers crossed they can buy back stock someday soon at these cheap prices,” said Christopher Marinac, director of research for Janney Montgomery Scott LLC.

The Fed’s decision to allow banks to continue paying dividends drew a dissent from Lael Brainard, an Obama appointee still on the Fed board, who has said allowing banks to deplete capital buffers could force them to tighten credit in a protracted downturn.

Some former U.S. regulators have said the Fed should order the largest banks to suspend payouts to preserve capital at a time of soaring unemployment and business disruption that may eclipse the 2008 financial crisis.

“If things work out well, banks can distribute income later on,” Janet Yellen, a former Fed chairwoman, told The Wall Street Journal this spring. “If not, they’ll have a buffer that will be needed to support the credit needs of the economy.”

The Fed committed earlier this month to support the economic recovery by setting a higher bar to raise interest rates and by signaling it expected to hold rates near zero for at least three more years.

In new projections released after a two-day policy meeting in mid-September, all 17 officials who participated said they expect to keep rates near zero at least through next year, and 13 projected rates would stay there through 2023.

Here Is A List,Here Is A List,Here Is A List,Here Is A List,Here Is A List,Here Is A List,Here Is A List,Here Is A List,Here Is A List,Here Is A List,Here Is A List,Here Is A List,Here Is A List,Here Is A List,

 

Go back

Leave a Reply