Despite Reprieve, New Tariffs Will Hit Wide Range of Consumer Goods (#GotBitcoin?)
Levies of 10% on some apparel, electronics, watches and sporting goods from China start Sept. 1, followed by smartphones, laptops and toys Dec. 15. Despite Reprieve, New Tariffs Will Hit Wide Range of Consumer Goods (#GotBitcoin?)
President Trump may have scaled back tariffs on Chinese goods to spare holiday shoppers, but consumers are likely to feel the pinch anyway, economists and analysts say.
An array of apparel, electronics, watches and sporting goods from China will be hit with levies of 10% starting Sept. 1. The value of those and other products subject to the new tariffs totaled $111 billion last year, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis.
“It is not entirely accurate to label this a de-escalation,” said Chris Krueger, managing director of the Cowen Washington Research Group. He likened the policy to telling someone: “I was going to break both of your arms on Sept. 1—now I am only going to break your elbow.”
Beijing wasn’t impressed by the ratcheting back of tariffs, either. On Thursday, an official with the State Council’s Customs Tariff Commission denounced the rise in tariffs and said “China would have no choice but to take necessary countermeasures.”
Mr. Trump did sideline tariffs on smartphones, laptops, toys and other Chinese imports valued last year at $156 billion, saying Tuesday that he wanted to soften the impact on consumers for the holiday season. But those tariffs are set to kick in Dec. 15, and meanwhile the U.S. will in two weeks be collecting tariffs on about $361 billion in Chinese imports—the levies on $111 billion worth of annual imports that starts Sept. 1 plus previous tariffs on $250 billion in Chinese goods.
Previous rounds of tariffs have largely spared consumers, with the administration targeting items like telecommunications equipment, metal alloys or mechanical devices that tend to be purchased by businesses.
That changes next month. About $33 billion in apparel, shoes and hats are among the items subject to a 10% tariff on Chinese imports beginning Sept. 1, according to a Journal analysis of data from the U.S. Trade Representative’s office and the Census Bureau.
The Sept. 1 list also includes about $27 billion in electronics. That includes a bevy of routine items ranging from wireless surveillance cameras to solid-state drives and some TVs, the Journal’s analysis found.
All told, 69% of consumer goods from China will be subject to tariffs starting Sept. 1—up from 29% currently, according to Chad Bown, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for Economics.
Mr. Trump held off on imposing all the threatened tariffs following warnings from retailers who said the levies could dim prospects for the holiday shopping season, the Journal has reported. The retreat also came as financial markets shuddered over fears that the U.S.-China trade war could put the global economy in a funk.
In determining which tariffs to postpone, one factor appears to have been the availability of alternatives to Chinese imports, according to the Journal analysis. A review of the tariff list indicates that tariffs were generally postponed for import categories, such as videogame consoles, where China accounted for about 75% or more of imports in 2018.
By Dec. 15, however, just about everything coming from China will be subject to tariffs. Only $19.8 billion of Chinese goods aren’t covered, including pharmaceuticals, some medical equipment and organic chemicals, and items under special import provisions.
The office of the U.S. Trade Representative has said there will be a process for companies to seek exclusions from tariffs, however, if their business would be unduly damaged by the new duties.
The direct effect of new 10% tariffs on $111 billion of goods is too little to derail the $21 trillion U.S. economy, economists say.
But that’s not the same as saying the effects will be unnoticeable to the U.S. economy. The direct effects of the newest tariffs would slow growth in the fourth quarter by about 0.1 percentage point, according to Gregory Daco, chief U.S. economist for Oxford Economics, a forecasting and economic analysis firm. He expects the economy to grow about 2% in the fourth quarter.
But that damage is likely to persist into 2020, he said, and could be amplified by growing awareness of the tariffs, and growing uncertainty from businesses and financial markets about what to expect from future trade policy.
“The uncertainty that pertains to these tariffs is going to have an effect beyond the tariffs,” said Mr. Daco. “It’s not just about goods costing more, it’s about the cost and time it takes for businesses to plan around these tariffs and trade tensions.”
Overall inflation has been modest over the past year, with the Labor Department’s consumer-price index up about 1.8% in the 12 months through July. But many items in the consumer-price index, from rent to health care to higher education costs, don’t have prices that are significantly influenced by tariffs.
The Trump administration focused its early tariffs on intermediate or capital goods, such as machinery purchased by businesses. Price increases on those items, though a hit to the U.S. importers paying the tariffs, aren’t obvious at the consumer level.
But when tariffs have hit consumer goods, the price increases for retail customers have been more apparent. According to a Goldman Sachs analysis of Labor Department data earlier this month, prices have risen by 3% among the categories of items that have faced tariffs, such as laundry equipment and furniture.
Prices have declined by about 1% for core goods that haven’t faced any new tariffs.
That backs up the findings of most research examining the tariffs, such as two high-profile studies earlier this year—one from a quartet of economists, including the chief economist of the World Bank, working on a National Science Foundation grant, and another from the Centre for Economic Policy Research written by economists from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Princeton University and Columbia.
Both concluded that although tariffs are formally assessed on U.S. importers when they bring in goods from foreign countries, the costs are passed on almost entirely to consumers.
Manufacturers Want to Quit China for Vietnam. They’re Finding It Impossible
Global companies are rushing to seek alternative bases, only to find even promising countries like Vietnam don’t match up.
With the U.S. and China tangled in a nasty trade fight, this should be Vietnam’s time to shine. Instead, it is becoming increasingly clear that it will be years, if ever, before this Southeast Asian nation and other aspiring manufacturing destinations are ready to replace China as the world’s factory floor.
The specialized supply chains that made China a production powerhouse for smartphones and aluminum ladders and vacuum cleaners and dining tables are nowhere near as developed in Vietnam. Factories with U.S.-focused safety certifications and capital-intensive machinery aren’t as easy to find.
And Vietnam, with less than one-tenth China’s population, is already running into labor shortages as global manufacturers rush to set up shop here to avoid U.S. tariffs.
“China has a 15-year head start—whatever you want, someone’s doing it,” said Wing Xu, the operations director for Omnidex Group, which helps make large pumps for Pennsylvania-based industrial equipment manufacturer McLanahan Corp.
Omnidex has shifted some production to Vietnam, but out of more than 80 parts of a pump used in mining operations, factories here have been able to begin work on only 20 so far because molds must be created from scratch.
“You can’t just shift your business to Vietnam and expect to find what you’re looking for,” she said.
Business leaders say they are preparing for a protracted fight between the world’s two largest economies. Few companies are planning to leave China altogether, but those that heavily clustered production in the country are urgently looking to diversify.
Some companies are relocating parts of their production lines to Southeast Asian countries or elsewhere, while continuing to manufacture in China for the Chinese and non-U.S. markets, a strategy they call “China+1.” Others with huge orders are hoping to nudge their Chinese suppliers to move operations out of China.
As a result, a new global manufacturing landscape is starting to take shape, executives say. Production leaving China is getting divvied up among developing countries, with a small portion going to the U.S. on the back of automation. The reordering of supply chains is likely to leave China with a diminished but still significant share of the pie.
The creation of new industrial clusters won’t happen overnight. Vietnam offers cheap labor, but its 100-million population is small compared with China’s 1.3 billion, and its roads and ports are already clogged. India has the manpower, but skill levels fall short and government rules are relatively restrictive.
“The question everyone is asking is: ‘Where should we go?’ ” said Giang Le, a Singapore-based analyst for strategic consulting firm Control Risks. “The answer is not obvious.”
California-based camera-maker GoPro Inc. is moving most of its U.S.-bound production to Guadalajara in Mexico while keeping its China operations for other markets. Universal Electronics Inc., which is based in Arizona and makes smart-home technology, has a new partner in the Philippines and is also expanding operations in Monterrey, Mexico.
Hong Kong-listed Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd., which makes Hoover vacuum cleaners, will set up a new plant in Vietnam and add capacity to its Mississippi operations. It will maintain some production in China for at least a decade, the company said.
The Chinese model of the past 20 years thrived on suppliers being close to each other, making production quicker, less expensive and more efficient. Now, as operations become more fragmented, they are threatening to raise costs, stretch delivery times and expose companies to multiple tax and labor regimes.
Companies are starting to focus on the intricate rules that govern how much of a product needs to be manufactured in a country, say Vietnam, to be considered “Made in Vietnam,” said Willy C. Shih, an economist specializing in manufacturing at Harvard Business School. “The era of the benign trading environment is over,” he said.
The shake-up is just the opportunity Vietnam has been waiting for. Labor-intensive manufacturing of sneakers and sweaters moved here years ago in response to rising Chinese wages. South Korean giant Samsung Electronics Co. has invested billions. Hanoi is eager to further expand electronics and engineering industries that are high up the value chain.
Industrial parks have been flooded with inquiries. BW Industrial Development, backed by U.S. private-equity firm Warburg Pincus, began building factories-for-rent last year. Its facilities are booked through December. Marketing head Michael Chan said some tenants are rushing from site visits to signing contracts in just a week.
Vietnamese firm Hanel PT, which makes electronics for fire alarms and motion sensors, says it is negotiating its biggest deal yet, equal in value to half its current contracts. The 20-year-old manufacturer counts big Japanese companies as clients, said director Tran Thu Trang, but U.S. firms have made contact for the first time.
Ho Chi Minh City-based Seditex Co. Ltd., which connects foreign firms to local factories, began receiving 20 requests a week after tariffs were increased last September, up from 20 a month. Foreign companies wanted to know about making a range of products, including backpacks, pliers, Bluetooth speakers, boat covers, suitcase wheels and clothes racks.
Founder Frank Vossen said companies accustomed to operating in China are struggling to adapt. “There is no ready-made solution in Vietnam, that’s the reality check,” he said.
Workers are already getting tough to find. A local exporter of pipes and hoses is swamped with orders for tariff-hit products, but it has only been able to hire 30 of the 100 workers it needs. A Japanese furniture maker for brand Muji said it has had production delays since January because of labor shortages.
Yotaro Kanamori, the planning manager for the Tokyo-based firm Generation Pass Co. Ltd., said the firm is now renting a factory for itself instead of relying on contract work. He struggles to explain to his Vietnamese suppliers why a table’s underside needs to be as well-made as the top.
The manufacturing shift toward Vietnam has been a long time in the making. Early movers such as Nike Inc. began buying shoes from Vietnamese factories in the mid-1990s. As minimum wages in China grew, more orders for clothes, toys and shoes shifted to less expensive destinations in Bangladesh, Myanmar and Vietnam.
Japanese multinational Canon Inc. began making printers in northern Vietnam in 2012. But supply chains for products like printers and cameras are vast and difficult to re-create. Of Canon’s network of 175 suppliers in Vietnam, only 20 are local companies, said senior manager Dao Thi Thu Huyen. They mostly make plastic parts and packaging.
Nearly all the electronics components come from Japan, China and Taiwan, she said.
The pace of companies moving production lines to Vietnam began speeding up last year as executives who had been weighing the country’s potential decided to take the plunge.
Christopher Devereux had started a company called ChinaSavvy in the early 2000s that took orders from Western firms for complex metal products and worked with factories in China to get them made at what he used to tout as “China prices.” By late 2018, after the U.S. imposed tariffs, his clients began asking: How quickly can you move out of China?
Mr. Devereux inspected dozens of factories in Vietnam, sometimes six a day, and rebranded his company “Omnidex” to project a global profile.
Relocating the manufacturing of pumps for Pennsylvania’s McLanahan Corp. is taking some doing. The pumps are made up of seven dozen pieces that must be cast precisely to avoid leaks. Mr. Devereux first tested the waters by making the small parts in factories near Ho Chi Minh City. Even that wasn’t easy, said Truong Khac Long, the Vietnam manager.
The bright red DuPont powder coating was tough to get. There weren’t as many qualified foundries to choose from, and those producing for the domestic market didn’t always have quality-control specialists. Engineers from China had to travel back and forth to Vietnam, where suppliers made samples again and again to get it exactly right.
Executives decided the manufacturing of bigger parts couldn’t be moved. The pump would be produced in two countries, unable to fully escape tariffs.
By spring 2019, Peter Zhao, who was in charge of getting products made for Wisconsin-based electrical tools company ECM Industries, had given up hope the trade war would end. He turned to Google to search for agents in Southeast Asia and contacted Vietnam-based intermediary Seditex.
Mr. Zhao directed them to find a factory with experience making multimeters, which measure voltage and are currently made in China. Seditex agents scoured their networks but couldn’t come up with one. The closest fit was a firm called Viettronics that made TVs and other devices.
In their office, a Viettronics R&D expert dismantled the sample multimeter Mr. Zhao had sent. His conclusion: The company could find local suppliers for the instrument’s plastic casing and cables and assemble the multimeter in its factory, but some of the major parts, like the integrated circuit, would need to be imported.
That was a problem for Mr. Zhao. He was used to buying nearly everything in China since production of the multimeter moved there a decade ago from Taiwan. Over time, Chinese factories created their own tweaked model that drew on the strengths of their well-developed supply networks.
Mr. Zhao didn’t get involved with solving design questions or finding components, concerning himself only with the finished product and final price. He interacted largely with the main supplier, not the tiers of vendors underneath, and maintained a lean operation.
To move production to Vietnam, he said he would have to develop a cross-border supply chain from scratch, identify factories in China for parts the Vietnamese can’t make and negotiate quality standards, compatibility and prices. He didn’t have the manpower or budget for that, he said.
Still, he is thinking about brokering a partnership so that major Chinese parts can be encased in Vietnam-made plastic covers and assembled in a Vietnamese factory. He worries though that if something goes wrong, his Chinese and Vietnamese vendors will each blame the other.
“It’s risky,” he said. “It may not work, and the costs may be too high.”
Despite Reprieve, New Tariffs,Despite Reprieve, New Tariffs,Despite Reprieve, New Tariffs,Despite Reprieve, New Tariffs,Despite Reprieve, New Tariffs,Despite Reprieve, New Tariffs,Despite Reprieve, New Tariffs,Despite Reprieve, New Tariffs,Despite Reprieve, New Tariffs,Despite Reprieve, New Tariffs