Open 24/7/365

We Have A Life-Time Warranty /
Guarantee On All Products. (Includes Parts And Labor)

Trump Tariffs Wreck Boat Builder Business (#GotBitcoin?)

American companies that spent years trying to build a foothold in Europe are being torpedoed by the EU’s retaliatory tariffs. Trump Tariffs Wreck Boat Builder Business (#GotBitcoin?)

For workers at the Formula boat factory, it’s pretty easy to know when one of the vessels they’re assembling is destined for a European buyer.

Higher-voltage electrical systems are required. So are unique stability measurements. Plywood and vinyl are changed to satisfy environmental standards, and drains or door sills may need installing.

It’s the classic exercise in checking regulatory box after regulatory box, but well worth the fuss. For years, Europeans have routinely paid more than half-a-million dollars for Formula’s boats and yachts.

Unfortunately, tweaking a boat for sale in Europe is increasingly uncommon in northeast Indiana. Scott Porter, Formula’s president, told me this week the company has shipped one unit across the Atlantic since the European Union’s retaliatory tariff raised the price of an American boat there by 25%. That was a year ago, when EU officials assembled a long list of U.S. targets in response to President Trump’s steel and aluminum tariffs.

The duty, which adds between $25,000 and $400,000 to the price of a Formula boat, is in addition to a value-added tax of roughly 20%. And that’s on top of delivery charges that can tack on thousands of dollars more.

Before the tariffs, Mr. Porter typically sent as much as 10% of his production, or 35 boats, to Europe each year. That’s important income for a decades-old family firm that employs 350 people in labor-intensive and pressure-packed jobs. Providing good benefits, a steady stream of tasks and job security is critical in an era when workers can easily find another place to earn a paycheck.

Formula’s problems are shared by a significant chunk of the U.S. boatbuilding industry, where shipments to the EU have declined 30% since the tariffs were enacted, according to the National Marine Manufacturers Association. EU sales had previously sizzled. Thom Dammrich, the trade association’s president, said some boat makers have iced expansion plans or cut workers as a result of an abrupt slowdown.

“It’s like someone flipped a switch,” Mr. Porter said, sitting at a conference table in his office Monday. Formula hasn’t cut jobs. Neither has Rob Parmentier, the CEO of Wisconsin-based Marquis Yachts. But he says Europe had represented about 15% of the company’s sales.

“Our international business is gone,” Mr. Parmentier said. He’s optimistic some of Marquis’ international sales will return after Canada recently removed a tariff on U.S. boats.

Messrs. Porter and Parmentier blame a trade war that is showing little sign of abating. Both suggest it may be time for the Trump administration to slap similar tariffs on big-ticket items from Europe. It’s unclear whether that will happen.

Mr. Parmentier, whose most expensive yachts exceed $4 million, has seven European orders ready to be filled when the tariff disappears. While he waits, hard-fought market share is drifting away.

The Trump administration has argued that its tariffs on aluminum, steel and other foreign goods may raise raw material costs or consumer prices today, but that short-term pain is worth the long-term pursuit of fairer trade. But the retaliatory penalties that Europe, China and others have countered with show that the short-term pain can be considerable—and maybe not so short term.

“When you’re out of a market for a long time, you lose your steam,” Mr. Porter said.

The nightmare scenario looks like this: Big dealers in foreign markets might forget you; big regional boat shows go on without you; buyers eventually ditch you, opting for German, British, Italian or French alternatives that aren’t subject to similar border taxes.

It won’t be impossible to recover. U.S. brand names have long thrived in Europe, with icons like McDonald’s , Marlboro, Coca-Cola and Ford earning strong reputations. Fashion brands have shown particular resilience. But that’s as much the exception as it is the rule.

There are plenty of examples of the difficulties and failures of American companies trying to establish themselves or keep pace in the European markets. Currency fluctuations, fragmented markets, state subsidies for local players and fickle tastes often bar the door to success.

Starbucks Corp. has been trying to make deeper inroads in Europe for two decades, but can’t match its U.S. success. Inc., the U.S. e-commerce heavyweight, is wrestling with a similar problem. Walmart Corp., Best Buy Co. and General Motors Co.’s Chevrolet brand are among the many American firms to suffer high-profile and costly missteps. Some ended up bailing on Europe entirely.

Not all brands embroiled in the current trade confrontation willingly accept market-share erosion. Take Harley-Davidson Inc., Jack Daniels, or Levi Strauss & Co.—three of the most popular brands targeted by the EU’s retaliatory tariffs. These companies don’t want to lose buyers, so they are paying the duties themselves in a move that is equivalent to sacrificing profit for a sale.

Lawson Whiting, chief executive of Jack Daniel’s maker Brown-Forman Corp. , calls this “eating the cost of these tariffs to invest in consumer momentum.” Harley pays out a $2,000 subsidy per bike, equating to $100 million in annual trade-fight subsidies. Brown-Forman is spending about $125 million this year. Both companies pull in more than $3 billion in annual revenue, a sum that most boat makers would need a decade to achieve. In other words, a big balance sheet makes eating tariffs a little easier to do.

Harley eventually plans to move its production of European bikes out of the U.S. as a long-term solution. At least one major boat maker, Sea Ray owner Brunswick Corp. , employs a strategy like this. Nearly every boat it sells on the Continent is made there.

Mr. Parmentier says most domestic boat makers don’t have the resources or appetite to open factories outside of the U.S. Besides, “Made in the U.S.A.” can carry some weight even in distant ports of call. “The world recognizes American builders as quality,” he says. They are also among the world’s most efficient and cost-effective, capable of producing in a month what foreign manufacturers can in a year, according to trade officials.

Some boat builders are among the companies willing to dip into profits to keep a foot in the European market. Bill Yeargin, CEO of Florida-based Correct Craft Inc., says in some cases the company will help dealers cover the cost of the tariffs. But this is costing Mr. Yeargin millions and isn’t sufficient to maintain his sales levels. The company’s European business, which had been about $20 million annually, has fallen by a third.

“We’re in 70 countries and have invested a lot of money in developing distributors around the world,” he said. It’s important to keep a lifeline to dealers in foreign markets, because “once you lose one it’s really tough to get them back.”

but Formula Boats attributes some of the decline to a petering out of underlying demand.

In the initial days after the tariffs were enacted, U.S. demand was robust and this blunted the impact of troubles in Europe. “It had been excellent,” Mr. Porter said. “I want to emphasize ‘had.’ It’s still good, but there are some signs of a slowdown.”

For executives like Mr. Porter, a second-generation boat builder, a life raft can’t come soon enough.

10% Tariffs Were Manageable. At 25%, Businesses Are Squirming 

An importer of vinyl flooring spends ‘nearly 100% of my energy’ trying to defray the cost of Washington’s levies on Chinese products.

When the U.S. raised its tariffs on Chinese imports in May, Harlan Stone knew his U.S. vinyl flooring importing business had to move fast.

He got on the phone with his main customer, Home Depot Inc., to update it. Soon he was on a plane to China, prepared for tough conversations with suppliers.

Mr. Stone cajoled his Chinese suppliers not to let the now-25% tariff deter them from the American market. He worked across time zones to see if Home Depot would absorb part of the added costs. He tried to time ocean shipments so that some might not be subject to the punitive levies. And his U.S. team looked at rejiggering transport and packaging costs for more savings.

“It comes down to every little thing,” said Mr. Stone, wearing sneakers and a Yankees cap as he moved between meetings in the Yangtze River port city of Zhangjiagang. “We find every quarter-point we can. If you have 10 quarter-points, then you have 2½ points.”

When the Trump administration first imposed 10% tariffs on many Chinese goods about a year ago, suppliers, importers, distributors and retailers worked together to defray the cost and try to avoid passing it on to consumers for fear of losing sales. Mr. Stone and his Chinese partners initially ate most of the vinyl flooring tariff cost, passing just a tad on to retailers.

Tariffs at the 25% level are quite another matter. They are upending cost projections and business models and straining relationships built up over decades. For operations such as Mr. Stone’s, the math is painful. He and others are trying to figure out how much of the new expense can be dispersed throughout the supply chain, how much should be passed to customers, at what potential cost in lost sales, and how much they must swallow.

These tit-for-tat tariffs, at their new higher levels, are forcing businesses into tortuous calculations and negotiations. How these ultimately turn out will have ramifications throughout the U.S. economy, determining how the higher costs get distributed and what effects they may have on sales, as the U.S. and China dig in for what is becoming a protracted trade battle.

“This is a chaos moment. If I pay the tariffs, I don’t have any money,” said Mr. Stone.

The 61-year-old has been buying goods from Asia since the 1970s, first from Taiwan and later mainland China, having followed his father into the vinyl flooring business.

The product, often made to look like hardwood flooring or stone, was one of the largest categories of Chinese exports on the U.S. target list for tariffs. The U.S. vinyl flooring market was worth about $3 billion last year, with most coming from China, according to Stifel Equity Research Group. High-end flooring, the kind Mr. Stone imports and sells through his wholesale and distribution business, makes up most of that market and is growing roughly 25% annually.

Mr. Stone’s Chinese suppliers, partners for decades, were shellshocked by the latest tariffs, fearing they and their thousands of workers would face canceled orders from American customers. Some smaller Chinese suppliers began offering discounts to European buyers to unload inventory.

On his trip to China, part of a multipronged search for tariff solutions that has absorbed him for months, Mr. Stone acted as a cheerleader, trying to rally his partners.

“Do not stop production. Do not let your workers go home. Finance yourselves locally,” he instructed managers at Zhangjiagang Elegant Home-Tech Co., a family business started by a Chinese factory worker-turned-entrepreneur and now run by that man’s Canada-educated son.

Mr. Stone and his Connecticut-headquartered HMTX Industries LLC wanted a commitment from Home Depot to absorb some of the higher tariff. A Home Depot spokesman declined to share details about the retailer’s approach, saying only that its strategy varies across vendors and products and that it makes “every effort to lessen the impact on the consumer.”

HMTX, which Mr. Stone said has about $700 million in annual revenue and a net profit margin in the mid-single digits, has a wholesale division that sells to other regional distributors in the U.S. That division decided to raise prices by nearly 20% on flooring. Wholesalers in general have raised prices of luxury vinyl flooring by as much as 50 cents a square foot, or close to 25%, according to estimates from industry executives.

The 18 Flooring Liquidators retail stores in California carry Chinese-made products from HMTX, among others. The chain has raised prices for some products because of the tariffs. Tiles for a living room, dining room and hallway space can run up to hundreds of dollars more than before.

“You can’t have a 25% increase and not have an effect on retail prices,” said Stephen Kellogg, president and owner.

As for other tariff-hit household goods, such as washing machines and furniture, FFO Home in Fort Smith, Ark., is raising prices on couches and dining-room sets with parts from China. Store owner Larry Zigerelli said some items have already gone up by 10% because of the tariffs imposed last year, and he expects to raise prices more as manufacturers pass on the 25% tariff.

For now, consumer spending in the U.S. is solid. By economists’ estimates, it will take three to six months for some portion of the tariff costs to be fully reflected in consumer prices.

On average, an American household will pay about $770 more each year under the 25% tariffs the U.S. has imposed on $250 billion in Chinese goods, according to Trade Partnership Worldwide, a Washington-based consulting firm working with industry groups. Consumers’ costs to are likely to rise more if President Trump carries through with 10% tariffs he announced this month on the roughly $300 billion in annual Chinese imports not yet taxed.

“There’s certainly going to be people who just can’t afford the same good,” said Katheryn Russ, an economics professor at University of California, Davis.

CFL Flooring, one of the largest exporters of flooring from China to the U.S., with around 2,600 workers at factories in Jiaxing city south of Shanghai, sees the tariffs as a portent of permanent change. CFL decided last fall to set up factories in Taiwan and Vietnam and started shipping goods from those sites in March.

“The desire to not be dependent on China is here to stay,” said Thomas Baert, a CFL co-owner. “Whatever happens with tariffs, certain customers have made up their mind that they want to be out of China for X% of their business.”

Mr. Stone thinks most manufacturing of vinyl flooring will remain in China. Since he began purchasing the product in China in the 1980s, he said, the country has developed a deep pool of skilled labor and quality manufacturers that would be hard to replicate.

Hundreds of Chinese factories compete for business, investing in new technologies to improve costs and products. Chinese suppliers, Mr. Stone said, have led the way in producing a thinner but stronger and more affordable form of vinyl flooring in recent years.

When he started working with Zhangjiagang Yihua Plastic Co., the company was still state-owned. The government assigned a demobilized military officer, Sun Yonghua, to run the company and he later privatized it, retaining Mr. Stone as a customer.

In May, over a dinner of crayfish, beef hot pot, fish and red wine, the two men discussed the tariffs and what to do about them. Mr. Sun said he was confident his company would get support from big Chinese banks, and that would help him weather the tariffs.

Mr. Sun bellowed that their more than 30-year partnership would survive. “Under your leadership, we aren’t afraid of the trade war,” he said, raising a toast to Mr. Stone. The two exchanged pictures of their grandchildren.

Throughout his trip, Mr. Stone took care to project optimism with Mr. Sun and other suppliers. Fresh designs were in the pipeline, he reminded them, and a new digital printing method from Italy would allow them to adapt designs more quickly. American customers would see that their offerings were higher-quality and pick those, Mr. Stone said.

He reminded them, too, that Home Depot hadn’t canceled any orders and was prepared to fight the tariffs too. Still, the lack of a firm deal with the retailer, at the time, nagged him.

Over the following weeks, there were emails, phone calls and texts with the Home Depot team. Mr. Stone’s colleagues made trips to the chain’s Atlanta headquarters. Their pitch was that Home Depot should share the tariff burden, otherwise HMTX and its manufacturers wouldn’t have money to invest in designs and processes to remain competitive.

“All that costs money,” Mr. Stone recalled saying. “I’ve built warehouses, I’ve stocked them, I have robots taking orders. If I don’t keep doing this, we’ll both lose.”

Home Depot’s argument for footing less of the bill, according to Mr. Stone, was that with this type of product, raising retail prices risked driving away customers. Unlike fixing a leaky roof or replacing a broken washing machine, homeowners could put off buying a new floor.

Home Depot set up what employees called a “tariffs war room” to analyze products and costs and devise pricing strategies, Mr. Stone said. In late June, Home Depot’s chief executive told CNBC it was working with suppliers to offset tariff costs, although part of the 25% would be passed to consumers.

A few weeks later, according to Mr. Stone, after six different offers and multiple revisions, he and Home Depot reached an agreement that will last until February. Without providing specifics, he said it was “in the spirit of half-half.” His Chinese partners, he said, were relieved.

Meanwhile, Mr. Stone is trying to get luxury vinyl flooring off the list of tariffed products. One argument he makes is that U.S. manufacturers can’t meet the huge demand for vinyl flooring at home. He has teams of lawyers in New York, Washington and Hong Kong working the issue and said he is in touch with legislators to help lobby the Trump administration.

In another challenge he faces, a rival that makes vinyl tiles in America, Mohawk Industries Inc., has lobbied in Washington in favor of tariffs on China-made goods. This year, Mohawk petitioned the U.S. International Trade Commission to block Chinese imports, alleging patent infringement.

On a recent Friday, Mr. Stone was in New York to meet a lawyer about next steps in the patent-infringement case. It had been nearly a year since the Trump administration imposed duties that hit the vinyl flooring business.

“Eighty percent of my time and nearly 100% of my energy goes to dealing with the tariffs,” Mr. Stone said.

Trump Tariffs Wreck Boat, Trump Tariffs Wreck Boat,Trump Tariffs Wreck Boat, Trump Tariffs Wreck Boat, Trump Tariffs Wreck Boat, Trump Tariffs Wreck Boat, Trump Tariffs Wreck Boat, Trump Tariffs Wreck Boat,


Related Articles:

Companies Dodge Trump Tariffs On China By Rerouting Goods (#GotBitcoin?)

As China Tariffs Loom, Some U.S. Companies Say Buying American Isn’t An Option (#GotBitcoin?)

Trump’s Tariffs Is Killing The Middle-Class Market

Trump Tower Is Now One of NYC’s Least-Desirable Luxury Buildings

Ship Orders Fall To Lowest Level In 15 Years Indicating Trumponomics Is Not Working (#GotBitcoin?)

Why Stock-Market Volumes Are The Lowest In Months As The Dow, S&P 500 And Nasdaq Test Records (#GotBitcoin?)

Black Workers See Record-Low Unemployment In Addition To Smallest Wage Gains (#GotBitcoin?)

Trump Calls On Fed To Cut Interest Rates, Resume Bond-Buying To Stimulate Growth (#GotBitcoin?)

Fake News: A Perfectly Good Retail Sales Report (#GotBitcoin?)

Anticipating A Recession, Trump Points Fingers At Fed Chairman Powell (#GotBitcoin?)

Affordable Housing Crisis Spreads Throughout World (#GotBitcoin?) (#GotBitcoin?)

Los Angeles And Other Cities Stash Money To Prepare For A Recession (#GotBitcoin?)

Recession Is Looming, or Not. Here’s How To Know (#GotBitcoin?)

How Will Bitcoin Behave During A Recession? (#GotBitcoin?)

Many U.S. Financial Officers Think a Recession Will Hit Next Year (#GotBitcoin?)

Definite Signs of An Imminent Recession (#GotBitcoin?)

What A Recession Could Mean for Women’s Unemployment (#GotBitcoin?)

Investors Run Out of Options As Bitcoin, Stocks, Bonds, Oil Cave To Recession Fears (#GotBitcoin?)

Goldman Is Looking To Reduce “Marcus” Lending Goal On Credit (Recession) Caution (#GotBitcoin?)

Our Facebook Page

Your Questions And Comments Are Greatly Appreciated.

Monty H. & Carolyn A.

Go back

Leave a Reply